What is the difference between what is known and what is thought to be psychological?

Knowing is knowing in the heart, this matter is known, thinking that it is a psychological judgment, thinking that this thing should be like this, this is a difference, one is a fact, and the other is one's own judgment.

It is known that it is already known, and it is still done to knowingly. Thought it was. I don't know if I think so, I just think it's so.

You guessed it. These two things are different, what is known is something that is already known, and thinking that it is no longer just that I didn't know it, and I thought that this result was just a coincidence, and I thought it was right.

It is known that it has happened, that something that is already known already exists, and that it is thought to be confirmed, that he psychologically thinks that it is like this, but it does not necessarily happen.

It's actually very different from psychology. Because the reason for my son is that I basically already have this one idea, which is different from the hints of psychology.

What you know is that you think a lot of things, and you think that there are more real things, and you think that you are more scientific and rational, which is a more superficial opinion.

It is psychologically completely different from what it is known, and it is thought that it is a guess.

To know is to already know, to think that it is your own thoughts, to know what is going on.

I think it's like this, it's not true, it's just my own opinion.

To know is to know about this matter, so it is to know, and to think that it is not to know about it.

Knowing is something that is already known, and thinking is a guess, not necessarily true.

Known is a definite circumstance, but thought is a subjective judgment and not necessarily a fact.

It's best to think that in psychology there is actually one that you already know, but the other is something you didn't expect, so the two are different.

If you know, you already know it, think it's your own thoughts, think it's so, but it's not necessarily true.

What is the difference between what is known and what is thought to be in the new? It is known that it is already known that it is self-righteous to think that it is self-righteous, so that it is not necessarily the case.

What has always been known to think that there is something different in psychology is already known, and I think that it is speculation.

What is the difference between coming to oneself and smelling in psychology? Of course, this is different from himself, he can only understand himself, and in psychology he may not understand everything, and from the perspective of psychology, he must fully understand human nature, human characteristics and human action laws.

The above psychology means that we are studying psychology, and psychology means that we already know some knowledge of psychology.

I don't think it's fundamentally different, but you should still learn psychology.

What is the difference between value and odor in psychology? I have always known this fact, and the difference between misperception and subjective reversal is two-one.

There is a clear difference between knowing and thinking that there are two meanings.

This section of psychology is definitely different, because their cognition is different.

There is a very big difference between what is known and what has been done in psychology!

Archetypal heuristics are a psychological.

Concept refers to the generation of new ideas and ideas according to the essential characteristics of things. Prototype inspiration is an innovative approach to thinking. The attributes and characteristics of everything we come into contact with in our lives can form "archetypes" in our minds.

In the process of problem solving, the problem solver is inspired by some principles in the "prototype", so that he can combine the relevant knowledge of the current problem to form a solution, so as to solve the problem creatively. Archetypal heuristic theory helps people to understand the creative thinking process more clearly, and provides for the cultivation of creative thinking.

Emotions are more personal things, such as you are low, you are sad, this kind of emotion is you alone, and even others have no way to help you, but you can easily influence others.

Emotions are more social than emotions, and a group of people can easily have some kind of connection because of the same emotion, such as patriotism.

Say, love. Love is an emotional experience, and the kind of feeling you can experience when you fall in love with someone is emotion.

However, all the ups and downs you encounter in the process of loving someone, all the ups and downs you encounter in the process of pursuing him, are emotions.

Joy, anger and sorrow are emotions, and the process and expression of this emotion are relatively private.

Emotional changes can happen anytime and anywhere, and can change because of anything, so you are the main ** of your personal emotions, and at the same time, he can also make or break you.

Because even though it's personal, emotions still affect others to some extent.

Emotions are the result of external factors acting on you at the same time, and the occurrence of emotions has a lot to do with your personal experience and social experience.

However, emotions and emotions are not completely separated, and on the basis of interconnection, the combination of individuality and socialization can form a complete person.

We are all people who can be happy and sad, people with emotions, and people with emotions at the same time.

Emotions are moods, just like that sentence, the child's face is unpredictable in July, and the mood is the same; Emotions are the feelings you have for others.

Emotions are your personal state, such as you are happy and you are sad, while emotions are more emotional, which is how you feel about other people.

Emotional changes can occur anytime and anywhere, and may change because of anything, while emotions are sometimes fixed, and the same is generated by one's own heart.

Emotions are people's seven emotions and six desires, and emotions are people's attitude and experience on whether objective things meet their own needs. Emotions are biased towards the individual, and emotions are biased towards society.

When they are teenagers, people feel safe about the world and the position of others, and usually people build their place and confidence in the world by observing the expressions of others.

Emotions are a relatively personal thing of people themselves, which is their own, while emotions are more extensive, a kind of social emotion, which will be affected and changed by others.

I think emotions are easy to express, your joys, sorrows and sorrows are on your face, but emotions come from the heart.

Emotion refers to the experience of attitudes towards external things that accompany the cognitive and conscious processes, and is the response of the human brain to the relationship between objective external things and the needs of the subject, and is a kind of psychological activity mediated by individual needs. Emotions are described as sudden reactions to important events, either internally or externally, and a subject always reacts the same way to the same event. Emotions are short-lived and produce a set of responses that are coordinated with language, physiology, behavior, and neural mechanisms.

Human emotions also derive from biological performance, especially being enhanced in evolution.

Emotion is a general concept that sometimes includes emotions, feelings, and moods, and can sometimes be referred to in a specific way"Emotions"。Fold emotions with"Emotion"The term is often used interchangeably, but there are differences. Most of the psychology textbooks in China and the Dictionary of Psychology believe that emotions are related to people's natural needs, and have situational, temporary, and obvious external manifestations. Emotions are related to people's social needs, and they are stable and persistent, and do not necessarily have obvious external manifestations.

The generation of emotions is accompanied by emotional responses, and the changes in emotions are also controlled by emotions. Usually the kind of object that satisfies a certain need of a person will give rise to affirmative emotional experiences, such as satisfaction, joy, pleasure, etc.; Otherwise, it leads to negative emotional experiences, such as dissatisfaction, sadness, fear, etc. Emotion is a part of the whole of attitude, which is in harmony with the introverted feelings and intentions in the attitude, and is a complex and stable physiological evaluation and experience of the attitude.

347 is a master's degree and 312 is academic, and the two of them have different revision directions and exam focuses.

Postgraduate Entrance Examination Psychology Academic Year Topic.

If you have any questions about resources, please feel free to ask.

312 is the unified examination for the master's degree in psychology**Oh, and 347 is the master's degree in applied psychology**ha. One is a master's degree and the other is a master's degree, and the scope of the examination and the bibliography are different.

The 312 unified examination for master's degree is English I, Politics, and 312 Psychology major; The 312 professional course is unified across the country, and its book list is shown in the figure below

347 is the self-proposition of the college, and the test results of each college's professional courses are different, and you need to look at the book list or recommended book list provided by the college to review. Three subjects, Politics, English II, 347 Psychology Major.

Psychologically speaking, there is no difference at all, except that the first one is more focused on sincerity and sincerity, and the second is more important in terms of importance.

The meticulous expression of the heart, from a psychological point of view, is not reluctant at all, and it must be repeated.

Piaget's assimilation refers to the integration of environmental factors into the existing schema or structure of the organism in the development of the child, in order to strengthen and enrich the movements of the subject. That is, when children encounter experiences that coincide with their original schema throughout the process of psychological development, they will assimilate them. Otherwise, it will break the original schema to adapt to the new environment.

Ausubel's theories are more applicable to educational psychology. And his idea of assimilation is at the heart of his theory of the reception of meaningful speech. It means that the learner's new learning material has a logical relationship with the original knowledge in his brain and interacts with it, so that learning is the most effective.

It can be said that it is a method of learning, and he also proposed three modes of classroom assimilation and so on.

In general, Ausubel's ideas may be the same as Piaget's, because they are both figures of the cognitive school, but Piaget is an early one and belongs to the classical cognitive school. And Piaget's theory is not only used in the psychology of education, but also in the psychology of child development.

My personal feeling: Piaget wanted to express the objective cognitive laws, which you can understand as the laws that occur with unconscious participation; Ausubel speaks of a conscious method or proposition that has a facilitating effect.

The former belongs to a concept in the cognitive theory of learning, and the latter belongs to a concept in Piaget's theory of cognitive development. According to the definition in the book and my personal understanding, Ausurpor's "assimilation" emphasizes the result of the interaction between old and new knowledge through meaningful learning, that is, "assimilation of meaning"; Piaget's "assimilation" is to incorporate environmental factors into the existing schema of the organism in order to strengthen and enrich the subject's movements, and conform to form two forms of adaptation. The former emphasizes the outcome, while the latter emphasizes the process.

Just by looking at the name, you can see that there is a big difference, and educational psychology is a special examination for teacher qualifications.

Psychology is a science that studies the laws of human behavior and mental activities, with the aim of revealing the laws of human mental activities. Educational psychology is a branch of psychology that studies the phenomenon of mental activity of educators and educated people in the process of education and teaching, as well as the laws of their generation and change. It is a marginal discipline that sits between the science of education and the science of psychology.

The research content of educational psychology is mainly the law of psychological activities in the process of school education, such as how students should master the knowledge in books, what is the relationship between students' learning motivation and academic performance, what are the good methods of revision, and so on. It is an interdisciplinary discipline. Therefore, it has both the task of pedagogy and the task of psychology, and educational psychology has a dual task.