1 2t, high speed fuel consumption, is it okay

Hello, the fuel consumption of the power running high-speed is still very low, generally about five or six oil, turbocharged low-displacement models are more suitable for running high-speed, good power and low fuel consumption!

If you run at high speed normally, if it is a car, the power output of this is generally about six oils.

Hello, the general fuel consumption of the power is about seven, and the performance is still good.

Hello. The comprehensive fuel consumption of the turbine engine is about one oil, and the high-speed fuel consumption is about one oil.

The overall fuel consumption of a vehicle with an engine displacement is about seven. The power performance of the engine is still relatively sufficient.

It depends on what model, and the fuel consumption is relatively good. Fuel consumption has a lot to do with road conditions, as well as driving habits.

Running at high speed is generally more fuel-efficient, and the fuel consumption should be about 6 to 7 in the case of running at a constant speed.

The fuel consumption of this one at high speed is about six points, of course, it has something to do with the driver's habits.

Relatively speaking, its fuel consumption is generally about seven fuels, but it is still related to your driving habits.

I don't know which car you're talking about, the average car has a high-speed fuel consumption of about 6 fuel.

Hello model, 100 kilometers of comprehensive fuel consumption should be about six or seven, I don't know what kind of vehicle it is, you can refer to it.

The fuel consumption of this car at a high speed of hundreds of kilometers mainly depends on personal driving habits and road conditions.

The difference between the engine and the fuel consumption of the engine depends on what car the two engines are installed in, and also depends on the gearbox that matches the two engines. The fuel consumption of the engine is 2 to 3 liters higher than that of the engine per 100 kilometers. Many cars are using small-displacement turbocharged engines, which is the trend of the future.

Turbocharging was first applied to aircraft engines, because the air is thinner after the aircraft rises to high altitudes.

Fuel saving tips: 1. Make sure the tire pressure is correct. The air pressure should not be too high or too low, too high or too low will increase fuel consumption, and the tire pressure should be checked regularly so as not to affect the driving fuel consumption.

2. Replace with fuel-efficient tires. Some brands of tires can reduce some of the drag and can help you save a certain amount of gasoline. Just like the advertising slogan, want to save energy tires can.

3. It is not advisable to change the size of the tire. The greater the tire width, the greater the resistance. Unless there is a special requirement for good grip, overly wide tires will only increase fuel consumption.

What is the corresponding naturally aspirated engine?

I don't know! I don't know! Not necessarily the fuel consumption is lower! It depends!

In fact, it is not that the smaller the displacement, the lower the fuel consumption! In order to achieve low fuel consumption, the car must pursue a "power-to-weight ratio" rationality! The simplest example:

You throw something, if it's a ball of paper, it's light, but how far can you throw it? The same makes you throw a big turn, it's heavy, how far can you throw it?? If you are asked to throw a pebble, you can fly far, far away with one throw!

— This is when the ratio between the weight of the thrown object and the force of the throwing thing with your arm is optimal!

It's the same with cars! A 2-ton off-road vehicle, you get him a machine, you say it is waste oil is not waste oil? I can't take it at all!

The differences are: the difference between driving on ordinary roads, driving on high-speed roads, and maintenance. More fuel-efficient.

First, the difference between and

1. The difference between driving on ordinary roads

Turbocharged. The engine is to reach a certain speed after the turbine will intervene, when the speed is lower than the turbo intervention value will not achieve the effect, so this working principle is very uncomfortable in the congested urban area, the urban vehicle is more general driving speed is slow, the speed can not reach the intervention value, then it is equivalent to the displacement.

Then the fuel consumption of the body dragging nearly 2 tons is very high, and then there is even if the turbocharging intervenes in the hidden forward pulse, a traffic jam in front or a red light when the brake speed goes down, so the frustration is also very strong and will not be too comfortable, and the urban drive is not as comfortable and fuel-efficient as the large displacement self-priming. Relatively speaking, the naturally self-aspirated engine is smoother in such a situation, which is naturally aspirated.

The advantages of it. <>

2. The difference between driving on high-speed roads

On the highway, the fuel consumption is relatively high, after all, the displacement is small, and after the turbo intervention, the power will be significantly improved, and the fuel consumption will naturally be lower; The problem also exists, the rear force is not as good as the self-priming stamina, and the general road conditions can not drive 4500-6000 rpm, which can ignore the problem of stamina.

3. Differences in maintenance

In terms of later maintenance, the maintenance cost is relatively high, and it is more economical.

Second, it is more fuel-efficient

It is the use of turbocharged engine, the advantage of this engine is that the start is fast, the torque is large, the role of turbocharging is to increase the air intake of the engine, so as to improve the power and torque of the engine, so that the vehicle is more powerful.

Rather, it is a naturally aspirated engine, which is atmospheric pressure without passing through any supercharger.

A form of pressing air into the combustion chamber, generally speaking, the engine is more powerful and more fuel-efficient, but the maintenance cost is relatively higher.

Under normal conditions, fuel consumption at high speeds of 100 km is about 9 liters, and in urban areas - 11 12 liters. Fuel consumption is greater. Cars with a t are turbocharged and have a real displacement of up to or greater.

Depending on the model, the version will theoretically be more fuel-efficient, as the T version is a new type of engine and is better than a normal engine. The same model with turbocharged fuel consumption is higher.

Turbocharging was born by increasing the "mobility" of the external turbine and squeezing more horsepower, so the fuel consumption of the engine had to be higher than that of a naturally aspirated engine.

Difference between t and l:

Difference 1: engine form.

It represents a vortex supercharged engine, while it represents an ordinary naturally aspirated engine.

Difference 2: Power.

The engine is more powerful than ordinary self-priming, although it may not be too obvious in the middle and low speed stages, but when the vehicle reaches a certain speed range, at this time the vortex energy supercharging intervenes, and the air intake increases, then you will really understand the essential difference between and.

The above content reference: Encyclopedia - fuel consumption of 100 kilometers.

The above content reference: Owner's Guide - The difference between car displacement T and L, which is equivalent to how much displacement.

When driving on city roads, it is more fuel-efficient, but if you are driving at high speeds, there is not much difference in fuel consumption between the two.

If the two engines are used in the same model, the engine will be more fuel-efficient. Compared with the two engines, naturally aspirated and turbocharged, the power of engine tuning is different, the gearbox is matched, and the power output value of the two engines is also different, if you are driving in the city, the turbocharged engine is definitely more fuel-efficient than the naturally aspirated engine.

Theoretically, the fuel consumption is high, and the turbo is not fuel-efficient after intervention, but in the urban section, when the turbo is not involved, the model is equivalent to a 1,6 self-priming engine, or.

It should be high, in addition, depending on whether it is a manual transmission or an automatic transmission, and also depends on the personal driving method, urban driving must be high fuel consumption, and high speed is good

Of course, the power output is almost achievable, but the displacement is not much higher.

The most stark contrast, H6 and X80 fuel consumption is about the same, power, one in the sky and one underground, too much difference, the H6 can be said to be the most meaty car inside.

A lot of people ask, in fact, this is directly related to personal driving techniques, and the weight of the car is also directly related, in general, T saves some fuel, but the maintenance cost is very high!! The total cost is about the same!!

Theoretically, it will consume more fuel, but it depends on the weight of the vehicle and the structure of the gearbox configured with these two engines, simply put, when two objects (cars) with the same total weight of one ton, moving (driving) 10 kilometers at a speed of 60 kilometers per hour, they consume the same power and energy, the premise is that the displacement of the engines carried by these two cars can not be too different, what you say and the difference is not big, the fuel consumption of the whole vehicle is approximately the same, of course, if it is and the difference is large. In addition, the thermal efficiency and other data of different brands and models of engines are different, which are measured by the manufacturer when they are designed and manufactured, and outsiders cannot obtain them, and even the 4S store does not know, which is one of the important factors affecting fuel consumption.

Theoretically, it will consume more fuel, but it depends on the weight of the vehicle and the structure of the gearbox configured with these two engines, simply put, when two objects (cars) with the same total weight of one ton, moving (driving) 10 kilometers at a speed of 60 kilometers per hour, they consume the same power and energy, the premise is that the displacement of the engines carried by these two cars can not be too different, what you say and the difference is not big, the fuel consumption of the whole vehicle is approximately the same, of course, if it is and the difference is large. In addition, the thermal efficiency and other data of different brands and models of engines are different, which are measured by the manufacturer when they are designed and manufactured, and outsiders cannot obtain them, and even the 4S store does not know, which is one of the important factors affecting fuel consumption.

Fuel consumption is greater for the same driving conditions.

The main function of turbocharging is to increase the air intake of the engine, thereby increasing the power and torque of the engine, so that the car is more powerful. When an engine is equipped with a turbocharger, its maximum power can be increased by 40% or more compared to without a turbocharger. This means that the same engine can output more power after being supercharged.

Take the most common turbocharged engine, for example, after supercharging, the power can reach the level of the engine, but the fuel consumption is not much higher than the engine, on another level is to improve fuel economy and reduce exhaust emissions.

The answer to this question is not absolute.

Under normal circumstances, the vehicle equipped with the engine will be higher, but considering various factors such as road conditions, personal driving habits, and vehicle power matching, it cannot be ruled out that the fuel consumption of some displacement vehicles will be better.