I would like to ask for advice from legal professionals, and I would like to thank you very much

Your uncle is suspected of illegal possession of firearms.

According to Article 128 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China: Whoever commits this crime shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, short-term detention or controlled release; where the circumstances are serious, the sentence is between three and seven years imprisonment.

Serious circumstances mainly refer to: illegal possession or private possession of civilian firearms and ammunition, in relatively large quantities; Illegally possessing or concealing firearms or ammunition for criminal purposes, or illegally possessing or concealing firearms or ammunition for official use in military or non-military systems; Using violence or threatening to resist the confiscation of illegally possessed or privately possessed firearms or ammunition against state agents.

According to your description, your uncle's circumstances are not serious, and he may be sentenced to up to three years in prison, criminal detention or public surveillance, and if he pleads guilty, he may be sentenced to probation.

It is advisable to hire a lawyer to help.

Can it solve your problem?

The property of the co-owners must be bought and sold with the consent of the other co-owners, unless acquired in good faith. The case was not acquired in good faith because the neighbor knew about your situation and had approached you.

An invalid contract is invalid ab initio, there is no statute of limitations, and you can file a lawsuit with the court to confirm the invalidity of the contract at any time.

In addition, the property of the village collective can only be sold to the people of the village, and it is illegal to sell it to other people.

After marriage, because the property has been sold, you can ask your ex-husband for half of the money from the sale of the house. It is recommended to consult the law firm for detailed consultation.

1. If it is a suicide, then the unit does not bear any responsibility!

According to Article 16 of the Regulations on Work-related Injury Insurance, if an employee meets the requirements of Articles 14 and 15 of these Regulations, but in any of the following circumstances, it shall not be recognized as a work-related injury or treated as a work-related injury:

1) Intentionally committing a crime;

2) Drunk or drug addiction;

3) Self-harm or suicide.

2. Article 14 An employee shall be deemed to have suffered a work-related injury under any of the following circumstances:

6) Injured in a traffic accident or an accident involving urban rail transit, passenger ferry, or train for which they are not primarily responsible;

3. Out of humanitarianism, at most a few months' salary is enough, the family can only make trouble, but the company has no responsibility, and the unit can go to the police for the family to block the factory gate!

Please refer to the above!

Don't use it at all, call the police, let the ** go to annoyance, go to chase people.

Family members can go to the police station to deal with the siege of the factory, and legally speaking, the factory does not need to be held responsible.

Have you ever approved the construction of a wall? Does the village's stamp mean that you agree to build a wall like this? Is the construction of the fence not completed?

The agreement is valid. Here's why:

1.Based on the marriage relationship, the two people have joint ownership of the house, i.e. joint ownership.

2.According to the provisions of the Property Law and relevant judicial interpretations, in principle, where some of the co-owners dispose of the common property, the consent of all the co-owners shall be obtained, but if some of the co-owners dispose of the property, and the remaining owners know or should know but do not expressly object, it shall be deemed to have consented.

Specifically, in this case, if the seller's wife should have known about her husband's disposition of the ownership of the house from the perspective of a normal person, but did not explicitly object to it, it should be deemed that the seller's wife consented to the husband's disposition of the house, and it should be deemed that all the co-owners had consented.

Therefore, the subject of the house sale contract is qualified, and the house disposal agreement is valid.

Effective. If you have paid the corresponding consideration, the seller only needs to give half of the price obtained by ** to his wife, without the need for his wife to sign.

The seller, as the head of the household, also signed and fingerprinted, and several witnesses from the same village, they also signed and fingerprinted, as long as the ** of the agreement was in line with the market price at that time.

See him in court, he sues you, and he will basically not win.

If the seller breaches the contract, he has the right to request the transfer of ownership.