Ask for the big finger of the law. Legal compensation for finger disability

The young recruits have a clear political history and meet the political requirements for active duty. Those who disseminate politically erroneous remarks, are subject to criminal punishment, re-education through labor, custody and education, criminal detention, and other violations of law and discipline are not to be collected.

Judging from the above regulations, your question is not listed, and it should be okay, but if there are enough conscripts in the recruit area, it will be affected to a certain extent from the perspective of merit.

Whether it is included in the file or not is the school's yes, but if you want to be a soldier, you must ask the public security bureau to prove whether it is related to bad accounting.

Yes, it's not a crime, but at least you have a criminal record.

There is no clear legal rule on which finger to use when pressing the mudra.

In accordance with the provisions of the Contract Law of the People's Republic of China.

Article 5: "Where a party concludes a contract in the form of a written contract, it shall sign or affix its seal. Where a party puts a fingerprint on the contract, the people's court shall find that it has the same legal effect as the signature or seal. ”

There are three ways to sign a contract: signature, seal or fingerprint, all of which have the same legal effect. The "handprint" here should be a fingerprint imprint, not a person's name badge. Any fingerprint of a person has the force of law.

It refers to the right index finger to wipe the fingerprint to have legal effect.

Generally, the index finger is pressed according to the fingerprint requirements, and the fingerprint is only to prove the true intention of the person

The index finger of the right hand, unless the finger is disabled.

It's all your own fingers.

There are all of them, and the fingerprints are yours. You've got rid of it.

Originally, it was a civil dispute, but if you bite off someone else's finger, it becomes an intentional injury, depending on the sentencing, the bite off the finger should be a minor injury. Look at human resources. There are human resources on both sides of the family, so find someone to mediate over the trivial matters.

The two sides reconciled. The compensation money asked the other party to withdraw the lawsuit, and it was settled.

He is guilty of the crime of intentional injury and bears legal responsibility.

For the crime of intentional injury, legal responsibility shall be borne.

It's an accidental injury! to bear legal responsibility.

1. According to the "Standards for the Appraisal of the Degree of Disability Caused by Work-related Injuries and Occupational Diseases of Employees" 18) except for the thumb of one hand, the other 2 3 fingers (including the index finger) are disconnected from the proximal interphalangeal joint; It can be rated as a seventh-level disability, so as to support it.

2. Regulations on Work-related Injury Insurance

Article 3 Seventeenth Grade 17 Employees who are identified as Grade 7 to Grade 10 disabilities due to work-related disability shall enjoy the following benefits:

1) A one-time disability subsidy shall be paid according to the level of disability from the work-related injury insurance, and the standard is: 13 months' salary for grade 7 disability, 11 months' salary for grade 8 disability, 9 months' salary for You Rujian's salary for grade 9 disability, and 7 months' salary for grade 10 disability;

2) If the labor or employment contract is terminated upon expiration, or the employee himself or herself proposes to terminate the labor or employment contract, the work-related injury insurance shall pay a one-time medical subsidy for work-related injuries, and the employer shall pay a one-time disability employment subsidy. The specific standards for one-time medical subsidies for work-related injuries and one-time employment subsidies for disability shall be prescribed by the people of provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government.

3. The specific standards of one-time work-related injury medical subsidy and one-time disability employment subsidy can be consulted by dialing 12333.

Fingerprints have the same legal effect as signatures. However, as with signatures, if there is evidence to prove that the intention of the fingerprint is not true, such as coercion, deception, etc., there are invalid and revocable circumstances. Normally, the legal effect of fingerprinting is the same as that of signature.

Of course, but nowadays it's usually electronic handprints.

Both IOU signatures and finger prints have legal effect. Generally, both signatures and fingerprints can be validated. Moreover, there is no stipulation on which mudra to press, which means that whichever mudra is pressed will take effect.

It can't be measured in money, but it depends on what the situation is.

According to the civil liability that A, B and C need to bear in the case, A and B need to bear most of the responsibility, and of course, they also need to bear most of the economic compensation, while for B, it is basically not considered an accomplice, so he only needs to bear a small part of the damage to the dealer in the hunting dog and in the process of escaping.

B, as the nominal renter, is the first to bear the compensation to the rental company. His ID card and driver's license, such important personal documents, are kept by others, i.e. A, and A and B often go to rent cars, so the leasing company has good reason to think that A has obtained authorization to rent a car with B's documents, and in fact, B did not object to go to play together later.

The legal concept involved in this incident is "superficial **". That is, although the person (B) is not expressly authorized to person (A), as a bona fide third party (car rental company), there is reason to believe that Person A is the authorized person (the three people drive together to carry out acts such as dog beating), so the person (B) bears full civil liability. B should pay in advance.

The liability of A and C needs to be judged by B after proof (it is very likely that there is no need to pay for the rental car).

A is criminally responsible for slashing and wounding.

The company exists as a group, and the creation of a legal person is to make it clear who is responsible for the company's problems.