If StarCraft comes out in the same era as League of Legends, who will be the last king?

There is no doubt that League of Legends will win.

I used to be an interstellar player too.

StarCraft, in itself, optimizes the gameplay of the empire and the Red Alert to a certain extent. More intuitive and simple than they win.

However, its high reliance on operation and 1v1 makes ordinary players not hesitate to give up when they have an alternative.

Because of the 1v1 game, if you lose, you can only blame yourself.

Moreover, StarCraft's attack values are all deterministic and highly dependent on operations.

Combining the above two points, it can be seen that StarCraft does not have a good one"Shake the pot mechanism"

There is no fig leaf at all to comfort one's self-esteem.

Unlike Hearthstone, if you lose, you can say that you are unlucky, and your opponent is a god drawer.

Unlike the MOBA type of League of Legends, Dota 2 and other games can blame teammates for pits.

Losing is your own problem.

If it weren't for the professional, who would be able to withstand such blows again and again?

So for a game like StarCraft, the bottom users will always be losing because the win rate is not 50%.

Layer by layer, step by step. At the end of the day, only semi-pros remain, and pro gamers are playing.

Ordinary players can only watch and cannot participate at all.

How can such a game beat "League of Legends"? Combining the above two points, it can be seen that StarCraft does not have a good one"Shake the pot mechanism"

There is no fig leaf at all to comfort one's self-esteem.

Unlike Hearthstone, if you lose, you can say that you are unlucky, and your opponent is a god drawer.

Unlike the MOBA type of League of Legends, Dota 2 and other games can blame teammates for pits.

Losing is your own problem.

If it weren't for the professional, who would be able to withstand such blows again and again?

So for a game like StarCraft, the bottom users will always be losing because the win rate is not 50%.

SC, the reason is very simple, the difficulty of SC is more than a little higher, how many LOL players can do it at the hand speed of 1400apm at the moment of stuffing meat? And SC is not very friendly to primary school students and krypton bosses.,And the lack of kryptonite bosses who are the main force of the number of primary school students and the main income of kryptonite is naturally not comparable to LOL.,But LOL can't compare to SC in terms of ornamentation and operability.,LOL can only be more popular than SC and can't surpass SC.,Imagine playing SC and losing can play GG (good game) like entertainment.,LOL played most of the surrenders with a few slang words.,And SC is a game of the last century., You let lol out of the ...... at that timeThere will be no market at all, that is the era of Warcraft Interstellar Red Alert.

Of course it's lol.,Because StarCraft isn't free.,Will be phenomenal game influence,In China and Asialol, it's undoubtedly outstanding.,But in terms of game quality,StarCraft is a work of art.,But StarCraft isn't cool.,The total prize pool in history ranks second.,It's going to surpass lol (in 2017.,The prize pool is also ranked third.,It's half of lol.,The gap in the number of players is too big) and then look at the number of players Interstellar is estimated to be one percent of lol.。 The e-sports industry was brought into StarCraft, without StarCraft, the e-sports industry started a few years later, and the 2018 Winter Olympics, the first time in history to go to the Olympics was not lol, it was StarCraft.