Do people who bought new energy vehicles regret it now?

Which is more cost-effective, new energy vehicles or fuel vehicles? Let's analyze it from the following aspects:

1. Replace the battery**: The most painful thing for electric car owners may be to change the battery.

At present, the lithium batteries carried by new energy vehicles are mainly divided into two categories, one is ternary lithium batteries, and the other is lithium iron phosphate batteries, the ternary battery life is basically 5-8 years or 1000 cycles, and the life of lithium iron phosphate batteries is basically 8-9 years or about 2000 times. The situation of self-paid battery replacement is basically 2 100,000 yuan, and the market is about 1500 yuan kWh and 1300 yuan kWh respectively, so it takes 53 * 1500 = 79000 or 53 * 1300 = 68900 to replace a 53 kWh battery.

2. Use costs: There are several indispensable costs for using a car, such as maintenance, fuel (electricity), etc., from these two aspects, electric vehicles are very advantageous, and they are quite large. However, the range of the tram car limits the driving range, and it cannot be as convenient as the oil car, which can travel long distances, and it can be refueled for a few minutes and then left.

The range anxiety of tram oil trams requires the owner to have a good ability to control the power of the vehicle.

3. Depreciation rate: The depreciation rate of new energy vehicles is high, as we all know, much higher than fuel vehicles, many cars that have driven 10,000 kilometers for a year or two, and sometimes only half or even less than half of the depreciation.

In general, the electric vehicle model within 100,000 yuan, due to the low body itself and small depreciation loss, as long as the annual mileage is guaranteed to be 10,000 km, the cost of use of the car for more than three years will be lower than that of fuel vehicles. However, if it is a model with a price of 100,000 200,000 yuan, the depreciation loss is large, and the annual mileage needs to be guaranteed to be 20,000 km, and the service life of the car is more than six years, so that the cost of the car can be lower than that of fuel vehicles. As for the ** higher electric model, I believe everyone has a number in their hearts.

With the development of new energy technology, new energy vehicles are definitely becoming more and more cost-effective. As for whether the tram is worth buying, it depends on everyone's individual needs. Revise.

No regrets. This is a trend, and the main thing is that there is no limit.

If the mileage is not much, and there is a convenient charging pile, this new energy is still more recommended.

You don't have a limit, we have never had a limit in rural areas.

The first point is that new energy vehicles are updated too quickly, and they will become backward models after a year. New energy vehicles are in a stage of rapid development, about to catch up with the speed of smart phone upgrading, basically a new technology a year, a new appearance a year, battery mileage is getting longer and longer year by year, this year just bought the new energy flagship model, the second year will be outdated.

The second point is range anxiety. New energy vehicles don't want to run at high speeds, and they don't dare to go out if they have a battery life of 200 kilometers left in the city. The range anxiety of new energy vehicles is not only reflected in long-distance driving, but also when driving in Pingli Peiliang.

Although new energy vehicles save money, the fuel money saved is basically lost when selling the car.

The third point is charging anxiety. Even though fast charging technology is available now, there are too few charging piles or no charging piles in many places. By the end of 2022, the number of new energy vehicles in the country reached 7.84 million, and the number of charging pile infrastructure was about 2.61 million, with a vehicle-to-pile ratio of about three to one.

The number of new energy vehicles will be larger and larger, and once it encounters peak travel during holidays, charging on the road will be a very big problem.

The first limb transport four points, quality assurance issues to take. New energy vehicles for manufacturers for the lifetime warranty is generally only the cell, the power battery has the characteristics of endurance attenuation, some people say that it will decay after three years, some people say that it will decay after five years, but no matter how many years, this is a fatal shortcoming of new energy vehicles. In order to reduce the anxiety of consumers, manufacturers have introduced corresponding quality assurance policies, but the final interpretation of the battery warranty is still owned by the car company, that is, if the owner accidentally crashes the battery system while driving, the manufacturer will generally not warrant, and the owner can only repair it at his own expense.

The most important thing is that most of these warranty policies are only for the first car owner, resulting in poor liquidity of second-hand new energy vehicles.

The fifth point is the issue of parking spaces. To buy a new energy vehicle, you must buy a parking space, the parking space of fuel vehicles must be charged, and new energy vehicles are no exception, but the parking spaces of new energy vehicles should be installed with charging piles, and the charges are generally more than those of fuel vehicles, so the problem of parking spaces is also a problem.

If I run long distances, I'm worried about battery life.

As the power heart of new energy vehicles, the battery life problem has been a criticism of new energy vehicles, and the most common questions we hear when buying new energy vehicles are none other than the following aspects:

First, once the battery of an electric vehicle is scrapped, it needs to be purchased again, which is basically the same as the value of buying a new car; Second, the mileage of the battery is not enough, once in remote areas or on high speeds, it is difficult to find a charging pile in time for battery life; The third is that the battery charging is relatively slow, which is not as fast as the refueling of fuel vehicles, which will delay more time.

According to the experience of the vast majority of users, we don't really care about the high mileage, because compared to the fuel tank of the fuel car, it is only 50 liters to 80 liters of all the fuel capacity, it is also difficult to achieve a range of 1,000 kilometers, and when it runs to about 400 kilometers, it is already a very good experience to reserve a distance of about 100 kilometers to find a charging pile.

If the cruising range of new energy vehicles is rigidly increased to 1,000 kilometers, not to mention the driving distance, how many customers really need such a high mileage demand, only in the case of urban exercise, for most office workers, this is indeed not an important factor worth considering.

If it is for drivers who have independent charging piles or are close to independent charging piles, the amount of cruising range is indeed not in the scope of consideration, and the real consideration of this problem is the driver who is not convenient for timely charging.

In addition, when the high mileage can be realized, the accompanying battery life false standard also exists, so that it is impossible to judge the time of the next charge according to the accurate remaining mileage, if this problem cannot be solved, then whether the battery life is 1,000 kilometers or 500 kilometers, then once the charging time is missed, especially for the car sales friends who often have a business trip, it will be a very troublesome thing.

Therefore, we also hope that our technical research and development personnel can better do a good job in this aspect of technical research, which can not only become a good selling point, but also save unnecessary trouble for the majority of car lovers, so as to make their own vehicles obtain better sales performance.

With the development of the economy, people's living standards have gradually improved, and every household can afford to buy a car. Due to the sharp increase in fuel vehicles, the problem of environmental pollution is becoming more and more serious. However, new energy vehicles have been strongly supported by the best because of their advantages such as environmental protection and freedom of travel.

Due to the introduction of national policies, many people will give priority to new energy vehicles when buying a car, but why do owners who buy new energy vehicles quickly cry out and regret it?

1.Battery life issues.

I believe that many car owners have been fooled by the salesman when they choose to buy new energy vehicles, saying that they have a strong battery life, and some even say that they can last up to 400 kilometers. As a result, when I bought it back, I found that this car consumes too much electricity, and it can run about 200 kilometers at most when fully charged. If you don't have to walk long distances every day in the city, commuting to work is a great fit.

If you often run a sports car or travel long distances, that's simply not possible.

2.Problems in the charge.

Despite the implementation of the new energy vehicle policy, the popularity of such charging piles is still far from enough. There are not many charging piles. Charging piles in many places are occupied by fuel vehicles, and it takes at least 4 hours to charge the charging pile.

It is very inconvenient to use emergency vehicles, and it is also inconvenient to refuel fuel vehicles directly. In many places, charging piles are extremely expensive, reaching the level of 2 yuan once, 200 yuan, and 400 kilometers, so there is no need to worry about tanker trucks. And it's hard to charge in big cities like Bechamp, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen, let alone those in second- and third-tier cities.

In some smaller cities, there may not even be charging stations.

3.Car battery life decay.

Actually, a car battery and a mobile phone battery are the same. After a period of use, the standby time and use time of the reeds have also been greatly reduced. From the perspective of the degree of attenuation of automobiles, the new energy vehicles bought may be eliminated in about five years.

For pure electric vehicles, the cost of batteries accounts for almost 70% to 80% of the whole vehicle, so the high cost of replacing the battery for a car can almost buy a new car.

4.The problem of source fuel rate of value retention.

The value retention rate of new energy vehicles is very touching. Due to problems such as easy damage to batteries and quick replacement, many used car manufacturers will not do unprofitable business. The low value retention rate has become an important reason for hindering the circulation of waste new energy vehicles, so no one wants to take over this "hot potato".

In addition to the above points, due to the rapid development of new energy vehicles and the immaturity of battery technology, many electric vehicles have experienced spontaneous combustion, which makes driving cars unsafe. However, I believe that these problems are only temporary. With the improvement of technology, new energy vehicles can also enter the mainstream stage of the automotive industry.

I don't think this statement necessarily applies to everyone, because everyone's car buying decisions and usage are different. However, some people may regret buying a new energy vehicle for the following reasons:

Expensive: New energy vehicles are usually taller than traditional gasoline vehicles, which makes many people feel overburdened when buying. In addition, many countries offer subsidies to encourage the purchase of new energy vehicles, but these subsidies are not necessarily sustainable, so some people may regret missing out on the opportunity to receive subsidies.

Inconvenient charging: If you live in an apartment or don't have a charging station, charging can be a hassle. Even if you have charging facilities, charging is much slower than refueling, which can affect your daily use.

Insufficient driving range: Electric vehicles have a relatively short range and need to be recharged frequently. If you need to drive for long periods of time or travel a lot, you may need to charge it on the road, which may affect your itinerary and experience.

Short battery life: EV batteries have a limited lifespan and need to be replaced regularly. Battery replacement is costly, which may be regrettable for some.

Nevertheless, new energy vehicles also have many advantages, such as being environmentally friendly, low operating costs, and so on. Therefore, everyone's situation is different, and whether you regret buying a new energy vehicle needs to be analyzed on a case-by-case basis.

The first problem with energy vehicles: insurance premiums and battery replacement costs are too expensive.

The second flaw of new energy vehicles: the cruising range cannot be consistent with the description.

Now many new energy vehicles are marked with a range of up to 600 kilometers, but the owners found that it is very good to have 400 kilometers to continue to stop the brother airline.

The third flaw faced by new energy vehicles: too few charging piles.

When buying a new energy vehicle, the first thing to do is to solve the problem of how to charge it. If the owner has a garage at home and can install a charging pile, it is not a big problem; But for those new energy vehicle owners who often travel to and from different cities, it is a very troublesome thing to find charging piles.

The fourth hard flaw of new energy vehicles: not maintaining value, depreciation speed.

On the whole, it is an indisputable fact that the current value retention rate of new energy vehicles is lower than that of traditional fuel vehicles. And there is a general rule in the market: the longer the new energy Jianxiyuan car is used, the more serious the depreciation will become, because second-hand car dealers will try to reduce the valuation of the car considering the service life of the battery, so as to ensure the profit margin of selling the car.

To sum up, there are four major flaws such as high battery cost, range anxiety, insufficient charging pile, and rapid depreciation of new energy vehicles.

Many people say that the cost of using new energy vehicles is much lower than that of fuel vehicles, and the purchase tax exemption is quite cost-effective. This is of course a fact, but on the other hand, the advantages of fuel vehicles have been intentionally ignored by these people, in addition to the higher value retention rate, the insurance and maintenance costs of new energy vehicles are also more expensive than fuel vehicles.

The most typical is Tesla, last year, a Model Y owner with a Jiangsu license plate hit the corner of the wall when reversing, resulting in damage to the body state, Tesla claims adjuster actually informed, "The rear shock absorber package was damaged, and the maintenance cost was nearly 200,000 yuan." The owner then complained, "The new car is only 280,000 yuan, and it is better to scrap it." As a result, it also caused netizens to complain about Tesla Model Y's "scratching is equivalent to changing cars".

A few days ago, it was Tesla's news again, which once again refreshed people's perception of sky-high maintenance costs. The car was pressed into a small stone, which caused an economic loss of 140,000 yuan to the car owner. Ms. Dong, a Tesla owner in Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, reported that when she drove the car and was about to leave the parking lot, the car just pressed a stone, and the stone bounced up (hit the vehicle) because of inertia, and after driving about 500 meters, the central control screen of the car displayed text reminders such as "activity alarm", "power has been reduced", "coolant level is low", "dash cam cannot be written", but Ms. Dong did not take the game too seriously according to the common sense of the car in the past, and chose to continue driving.

A day later, Ms. Dong sent the car to the repair center, and Tesla's after-sales personnel said, "The water inside the battery needs to be replaced, and the repair price is estimated to be 140,000 yuan." At the same time, in response to Ms. Dong's questioning, Tesla responded, "The battery accounts for half of the total price of the vehicle, because the battery is relatively important, and its ** is the official price." At the same time, they said, "This is an extreme case and does not represent Tesla's quality problems."

This incident also sparked heated discussions on the Internet, but I didn't expect the electric car to be so weak and "stone", and I couldn't afford to buy it but couldn't repair it. Some netizens commented that with this 140,000 alone, you can directly buy a Citroen C6, right?