Why is idealism a flower of wisdom that does not bear fruit?

This is the conclusion of idealism in a materialistic world, a flower of wisdom that does not bear fruit, in fact, in simple terms, it means that materialism says that idealism is simply nonsense, I don't know if you can understand this explanation.

Lenin said: Philosophical idealism.

Of course, there is epistemology.

It is undoubtedly an unfruitful flower, but it is an unfruitful flower that grows on the living, fruitful, real, powerful, omnipotent, objective, and absolute human knowledge of this living tree.

Categories: Social Livelihood >> Other Social Topics.

Problem description: Why is idealism accepted to a certain extent, but not a scientific theory?

Analysis: This kind of question mainly tests whether we really grasp the position, viewpoint and method of Marxist philosophy, the key to accurate judgment and analysis of this question lies in whether we can really treat everything with a dialectical negation attitude, even an erroneous theory such as idealism cannot be completely denied, because this overall erroneous theory also contains some positive and valuable views, and it should be pointed out when analyzing that idealism is compared to a flower that does not bear fruit, that is, it is both affirmed and denied.

The root of epistemology: It refers to the subjectivity, simplification, linearization, and one-sidedness of the cognitive process, which is the epistemic root of the emergence and existence of idealism. Lenin noted

"Straightness and one-sidedness, rigidity and rigidity, subjectivity and subjective blindness are the epistemological roots of idealism. And monasticism (philosophical idealism), of course, has epistemological roots, it is not unfounded, it is undoubtedly an unfruitful flower, but it is an unfruitful flower that grows on the living tree of living, fruitful, real, powerful, omnipotent, objective, and absolute human cognition. "Lenin's above thought indicates

First, idealism arises from the process of human cognition, which is a very complex "curve that approximates a circle and a spiral" full of contradictions. "Any fragment or segment of the curve of Shouyu may be one-sidedly turned into an independent and complete straight line, that is, there is the possibility of idealism. Second, the linearity, one-sidedness, rigidity, and rigidity of the thinking method, that is, the metaphysical nature, are important reasons for turning idealism from possibility to reality.

Third, idealistic philosophy is also a flower on the tree of human cognition, which is unavoidable in people's cognitive activities, and the idealistic philosophical system also contains some reasonable factors, which are not blind nonsense, but because it reverses the relationship between thinking and existence and is divorced from practice, it is generally wrong and unsubstantial.

To put it simply, idealism is called a flower that does not bear fruit, mainly because it cannot well guide people to understand practice and transform the world, cannot promote the development of social practice, and may even lead people astray.

The reason why idealism has existed and developed for a long time has deep epistemological roots. Human cognition is a cyclical process from perceptual to rational, from individual to general. Feelings, concepts, individuals, generals, etc., are all aspects or fragments of the process of knowing, i.e., "an element of knowing".

The emergence of idealistic philosophy has its deep socio-historical and epistemological roots, and if a certain fragment of human cognitive curve is exaggerated, it will lead to idealism. Idealistic philosophy is also a flower that grows on the tree of human understanding, and it is unavoidable in the tortuous process of the development of human understanding.

Because the philosophy of idealism reverses the relationship between thinking and existence, spirit and matter, is divorced from human social practice, and cannot correctly guide people's activities of understanding and transforming the world, it is wrong and unfruitful on the whole.

Analysis: This question uses concise and vivid metaphors to illustrate the epistemological roots of idealistic philosophy. It is from Lenin's Philosophical Notes?

On the Problem of Dialectics": "Linearity and one-sidedness, rigidity and rigidity, subjectivism and subjective blindness are the epistemic roots of idealism. It is undoubtedly an unfruitful flower, but it is an unfruitful flower that grows on the living, fruitful, real, powerful, omnipotent, objective, and absolute human knowledge of this living tree."

This points out the epistemic roots of idealism, and points out that its emergence also has its practical conditions.

Dialectical materialism believes that anyone who advocates the primacy of matter, the secondness of consciousness, and the determination of consciousness by matter is materialism; On the contrary, it is idealism. Practice has proved that "idealism is a flower that does not bear fruit." This is a clear line between right and wrong, and there is no such thing as "even truth" in idealism, and the representatives of idealism and their other theories cannot be equated with idealism.

What, then, is the unfruitful flower of idealism for philosophy as a whole? In my opinion, idealism is the inevitable product of human beings in the process of understanding nature and society, and is an inseparable part of the entire history of philosophical development. Idealism provides us with a negative teaching material for a correct understanding of the world.

A flower that does not bear fruit means that it has no seeds for self-reproduction, and is destined to not spread on the mountain of philosophy, but you have to admit that it has given this mountain full of "material" a trace of magnificent imagination. (Note: The fruit is developed from the seed).