Why is it so difficult to lower the age of criminal responsibility?

Because with the development of science and technology, some underage children have more contact with society earlier, so they are much more mature than their previous children, and they have experienced more things, so the probability of doing wrong things is also greater than that of previous children, but I feel that children under the age of 18 still look like children, and there may be a long way to go to reduce the age of criminal responsibility.

Because lowering the age of criminal responsibility is so difficult, it will make our mood develop well, and it is very difficult to reduce the age of criminal responsibility, such as we cannot change it, this kind of thing cannot be changed by human beings, and the seriousness of this kind of thing is unpredictable by human beings.

First of all, I think why should we lower this penal age, because everyone is fair, and if he hurts other people, he has to pay the price for him, but maybe he thinks that the age is a bit serious, but I think he should have a mind of his own before doing these things.

First of all, it's a social hazard to commit crimes, so reducing the age of criminal responsibility must be something that you did in prison or how you did an excellent performance to have this behavior, so it's difficult, well, you have to make mistakes directly and bear them yourself, so let's say let's make as few mistakes as possible, and it's better to be a good person.

Because you have already assumed criminal responsibility, the age has to be lowered, which is already very difficult, you have already assumed criminal responsibility, there is no room for bargaining, you must bear this responsibility, if you want to lower the age of criminal responsibility, it will be even more difficult.

Lowering the age of criminal responsibility is a particularly difficult thing, because now the Chinese will carry out particularly great protection for minors, and these minors are precisely the age of high crime, so I think that parents should strengthen the management of their children, so that they are more sensible and reduce violations of law and discipline.

It is particularly difficult to lower the age of criminal responsibility for the protection of minors, but now that these minors are at the age of high incidence of crime, I think it is necessary to strengthen the management of parents over their children and make them work harder to uphold the law.

The concept of the age of criminal responsibility violates the fundamental principle of equality before the law!!

I think that with the recent school violence incidents reported in my country, the frequent occurrence of sexual violence incidents such as teacher murder and other related sexual violence, it is very difficult to reduce the age of criminal responsibility.

If you have to be punished for doing something wrong, then you don't need to worry about age.

Support lowering the age limit, increasing the cost of violating the law, and protecting the interests of law-abiding citizens'Benefit.

At the same time, adults should be taught that anyone who commits crimes at any age should be held responsible!

There are experts, it doesn't say a few words, and it's not level.

It's just a case stage, and if there are too many juveniles who kill and set fires, the age of responsibility can be rewritten.

1. "Because the determination of the age of criminal responsibility is not a window for the public to vent their emotions for extreme cases, the definition of the age of 14 years old has been tested by history and conforms to the laws of China's national conditions. ”

At present, is juvenile crime in China still an extreme case, can you use data to tell me what kind of extreme case it is (previously, according to a public statistics from the China Juvenile Delinquency Prevention Research Association, the proportion of juveniles who have committed crimes, the age group of 14 to 16 years old has increased year by year, and by 2013 it has exceeded 50%, and juvenile crime shows a trend of younger age. ）？

Of course, people under the age of 14 will not be counted for "committing crimes", because "they are all nothing".

Experts, can you tell me about the increase in the juvenile crime rate in recent years: "The definition of the age of 14 has been tested by history and conforms to the laws of China's national conditions." ”

2. "At the same time, some experts believe that for juvenile crimes committed by minors who have not reached the age of criminal responsibility, tolerance should not be connived at, and educational measures should be taken to replace criminal punishment. "If a child is sick, he should be treated with the child's medicine, not with the adult's medicine. At the same time, we should not just blame the children themselves, but should reflect more on the shortcomings of parents, schools, society, and even the country.

We have been teaching appreciation, education, and tolerance for many years, can you explain their positive effects with the data before and after? The boundary between tolerance and connivance is **, please list it in the form of a law for teachers and parents to enjoy.

Everyone on the earth knows that there is no **** cure-all. However, there are always people who say that there are no students who do not teach well, only teachers who cannot teach. I really want to know which school has students who have not committed crimes, or even which teachers have taught students who have not committed crimes.

When it comes to social impact, what I do know is that society affects all people and not specific groups of people, but although the juvenile crime rate is rising, there are still not as many people who don't commit crimes. I don't know how experts explain this.

Speaking of family education, I would also like to say that the children taught by the same parents have both sins and non-sins. It is likely that the crime rate of only children is higher, but who is responsible for the only child? Some people may say that it is the parents who do not want to have children.

I don't think there is any need to argue with such a person.

1.Juvenile delinquency is on the rise.

With the increasing number of juvenile crimes in society, even murder can only be sentenced to custody and education because they are not of age, which has aroused strong social repercussions. "Lowering the age to 13 is in line with the social process. Xiao Shengfang said that with the development of society, thirteen-year-old teenagers have completed primary education, enrolled in junior high school, have considerable recognition and control ability, have been able to understand the nature and significance of their behavior, and should pay the corresponding price for their behavior.

2.Harm to society.

Lowering the age standard is not an international precedent, with Switzerland and Singapore setting an age of 7, much less than 13. At the same time that children are exposed to more online information and TV news, they have gradually formed their own values and outlook on life, and around the age of 13 is the period when these concepts are rapidly shaped, if they cannot be corrected in time, they are likely to make greater mistakes in the future, not only causing harm to society, but also irresponsible for their own lives.

Because the mature age of children is getting younger and younger, but because they are not at the age of criminal responsibility and are not controlled, it is necessary to reduce the crime rate accordingly.