Why is it difficult for the people to be rich? What will be the consequences of a rich country and a

Quite simply, wealth is concentrated in the hands of a small number of people, who are known as "vested interests".

The wealth of the country is not as good as the wealth of the people. That is to say, it is better for the state to collect taxes than to hide the wealth from the people.

1. Population 2. Knowledge Level 3. Population Differences.

If a country always has a large number of people living in absolute poverty, its economic momentum is underdeveloped, and ups and downs are inevitable, which will eventually affect every poor and rich person. Therefore, the unfair distribution of social wealth, the polarization between the rich and the poor, and the abnormal concentration of social wealth will inevitably lead to social instability.

In addition, the poor living conditions will make them lose their motivation to work and reduce their productivity. Social injustice and inequality also lead to the gradual loss of national cohesion. The idleness of a large number of population resources has led to serious social problems and threatened the long-term peace and stability of society.

The money you earn has to serve the rich, and that's the consequence.

First of all, the position in the words is different, and the importance is slightly different, and secondly, is whether the country is rich and strong, and then the people can be stronger and more stable. Or will the people become rich and strong first, and the country will become strong?

Why is the country rich and the people strong?

A small family is too small in the world, and the country is the whole family, and it has the right to speak in the world. The truth is equivalent to breaking a chopstick easily, but it is more difficult to fold multiple chopsticks together, although the explanation is abstract, but everyone should have a country, a country, a country has a home.

To give a simple example, were the nobles of the Qing Dynasty rich, but the country was not strong at that time, and the capitalist invaders of the kingdom did not oppress and exploit at will? Therefore, if you want to gain a foothold in the world, you must first make the country rich and strong.

The lyrics of "Country" don't also say the same: "Home is the smallest country, and the country is tens of millions; in the kingdom of the world, in the home of heaven and earth; Only when there is a strong country can there be a rich home", so the country is rich and the people are strong.

The country and the people are rich and strong, the spiritual and material civilization is rich, and the physique is strong.

In feudal times, it was said that the people were rich and the country was strong, because when the people were rich, the taxes would be high. Now it is said that the country is rich and the people are strong, and only when the country is rich can foreign countries not bully us, and only then can the people talk about being strong. Literally, if you want to dig deeper, you will study more.

It is possible to say that when the country is rich, the people will be rich, but it is certain that they will not fight with each other. There are prerequisites, that is, the state has a focus on welfare, infrastructure construction, national defense army construction, reproduction input, etc. The state has the money to do something very crucial.

When the country is rich, the people have potato resistance and are not rich is the standard to measure a first-class ability and style.

It is also possible to say that the people will be able to make the country rich if they are rich, but it is not certain. There are also conditions, that is, the people are patriotic, have good ideological qualities such as supporting decision-making, caring for the public homeland, and loving the culture of the motherland. The people have confidence in the country, live and work in peace and contentment, and respond positively to national policies, and it is difficult for the country to become rich and strong.

On the contrary, if the people are rich, and they do not trust the **, they have to immigrate as a business, when the country is in trouble, the people are rich and the righteousness is light, and the country cannot be driven by profit (the people have money), the country will not be able to resist aggression, and the wealth will not last long.

In fact, the two are making progress together, the country cares for the people, everything starts from the people's livelihood, does not engage in political achievements, only stresses practical results, naturally can make the people rich, the government decree is clear, the people naturally have confidence in the country, once the country is in trouble, it is natural to be the same enemy, and the whole mind is one. This creates a virtuous circle.

If the people are rich and the people's spending power is strong, the whole country will be rich!

The country is the whole, and the people are the parts. The status, role, and function of the whole and the parts in the development of things are different. The whole is dominant, the whole dominates the parts, and has functions that the parts do not have; The part is in a dominant position in the existence and development of things, and the part is subordinate to and serves the whole.

The dialectical relationship between the whole and the part requires that we should establish the concept of the overall situation, base ourselves on the whole, coordinate the overall situation, choose the best plan, and achieve the optimal goal of the whole, so as to achieve the ideal effect that the overall function is greater than the sum of the partial functions.

The Law of the Rich: A person who can't borrow money will never become a rich person.