Why do humans have laws and animals have no laws? Why

In fact, there are laws among animals. All kinds of social animals have their own "laws", but because they don't have a language, they can't be understood. For example, many animals have female clans, male clans, territories, elders and juniors, what should each animal do, this is the law.

Because law is an instrument of the will of the class embodied by the rulers, it is necessarily the product of the wisdom of the ruling class. Animals have not formed a higher intelligence and cannot create a systematic legal system, but some animals also have their own group behavior habits, which are instinctive behaviors formed in the long-term evolutionary process, such as some animals live in groups, some live alone, and such as the figure-eight dance danced by bees, and so on. Pure hand hitting, looking.

The law lets everyone know what can be done and what can't be done, so that life becomes stable and people feel safe. Animal society is the law of the jungle, and the strong can rob the weak of food, while human society is forbidden to do so, which improves people's level of civilization, sense of security and other unique human feelings. Welcome to continue working on this issue**, raising this question would mean the awakening of civilization.

Animals follow the laws of nature, and the laws of nature are more real, while human beings are unreal by themselves, so it is said that animal society is higher than human society, and human beings are the shame of intelligent life.

Currently copy

Article 115 of the General Provisions of the Civil Law stipulates that "things include immovable and movable property. Where DAO law provides that rights are the object of property rights, those provisions shall be followed.

It's a bit narrow, and my personal opinion is that people and animals also belong to the civil law.

The civil law grid system divides the objects in the civil law into three objects: the first grid is the ethical grid, which is the civil law grid of things with bioethical value. The second case is a special character, which is a thing that has a special legal attribute and should establish a special legal system, but does not include an ethical character.

The third cell is the general compartment, which is used to cover other things outside of the above two compartments, that is, ordinary objects.

Ethical personality is the highest qualification in the civil law, the highest status, the most restricted dominance of the civil subject, and the strongest protection by the civil law, and the qualification of the thing with life or personality interests. Summarized in this category are those human body mutations that are related to the human body, have life activity, or have personality interest factors, and have living animals and plants, including animals, plants and microorganisms, especially pets, wild animals and rare plants.

This view is wrong. Because human beings first came out of animals, they can autonomously manage their own social groups in a way that humans adapt to.

The clan society, which is a convention with no laws, only the original, which all members of the clan must abide by, is the most obvious example.

There is still a difference, there are high-end and low-end.

No, you can't. The law is the law that regulates people, and generally speaking, animals cannot be the subject of legal obligations.

For example, if a pet dog injures a person, its owner is not at fault.

But there is still debate about whether animals can be the main ones of power.

For example, if someone makes a will to leave all their property to their pet cat, as long as the will does not violate public order and good customs and national laws, the will is valid.

Regarding point 5, I think you are mistaken. The main body of inheritance law in China does not have pet cats.

You should report to the police as they may be suspected of a criminal offence.

Article 341 of the Criminal Law [Crime of illegally hunting or killing rare or endangered wild animals; Crime of Illegally Purchasing, Transporting, or Killing Rare or Endangered Wildlife and Products of Precious or Endangered Wildlife] Whoever illegally hunts or kills rare or endangered wildlife under key national protection, or illegally purchases, transports, or products of rare or endangered wildlife under key national protection, is sentenced to up to five years imprisonment or short-term detention and shall also be fined; where the circumstances are serious, a sentence of between 5 and 10 years imprisonment and a concurrent fine is to be given; where the circumstances are especially serious, a sentence of 10 or more years imprisonment and a concurrent fine or confiscation of property is to be given.

Whoever violates hunting laws and regulations by hunting in prohibited areas, during prohibited hunting periods, or by using prohibited tools or methods, destroying wildlife resources, and the circumstances are serious, is to be sentenced to up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention, controlled release, or a fine.