What are the bid evaluation methods for bidding and procurement of goods and services

According to the Administrative Measures for Bidding and Bidding for Procurement of Goods and Services, the bid evaluation method is divided into the lowest bid evaluation price method, the comprehensive scoring method and the cost-effective method.

The use of bidding for procurement projects is an important means to standardize procurement behavior, improve the efficiency of the use of procurement funds, safeguard national interests, social public interests and the legitimate rights and interests of the parties involved in procurement, and promote the construction of a clean government. Among them, the scientific, reasonable and legal bid evaluation method and the fair, just, scientific and merit-based evaluation process are the premise of producing correct bid evaluation results and an important guarantee for reducing bid evaluation disputes.

1. The bid method is the specific method of reviewing, comparing and selecting the recommended candidates for the bid evaluation criteria that have been determined in the bidding documents. As far as the bid evaluation process is concerned, it can generally be carried out in two steps, i.e. preliminary evaluation and detailed evaluation. Only bidders who have passed the preliminary review can enter the detailed review.

2. Scoring method.

Each member of the bid evaluation committee determines the relative weight score of different aspects of a bid according to the pre-established bid evaluation factors (such as **, quality, reputation, service, etc.) and the corresponding score standards, and then accumulates the ownership weight score to obtain the bidder's score. Finally, the scores of each judge are calculated in aggregate, and the bid with the highest total score or the highest average score is the best bid, and the bidder should be recommended as the winning candidate.

3. Comprehensive evaluation method.

After comprehensive evaluation by the bid evaluation committee, the bidder's bidding documents can meet the comprehensive evaluation standards specified in the bidding documents to the greatest extent, and shall be recommended as the winning candidate.

4. Lowest evaluation price method.

The bid evaluation committee calculates the monetary amount increased by each bidder when the specific indicators in the bidding documents deviate according to the bid evaluation criteria predetermined in the bidding documents. These amounts are then added together with bids to calculate a new valuation, known as bid evaluation. The bidder with the lowest bid evaluation shall be recommended as the winning candidate.

Summary. In view of the 57th comprehensive scoring method, the bid evaluation results are arranged in order from high to low after the evaluation. If the score is the same, they will be ranked in order of bidding** from lowest to highest.

Score and bid** are tied. The bidding documents meet all the substantive requirements of the bidding documents, and the bidder with the highest evaluation score is the first winning candidate according to the quantitative indicators of the evaluation factors. A new change in Order 87 is to allow tie-in-place candidates when ranking the winning candidates.

If the lowest bid evaluation price method is adopted, the bid evaluation results are arranged in order from low to high in the bidding **, and the bidding ** is the same; If the comprehensive scoring method is adopted, the bid evaluation results are arranged in order from high to low after the evaluation, and the same score is arranged in the order of bidding ** from low to high, and the score and bid ** are the same. If it is necessary to make an arithmetic correction to the bid ** or to implement the ** deduction of the **procurement policy in accordance with Article 54 of Order No. 87, the above bid ** refers to the adjusted bid**.

In view of Article 57 of the use of the comprehensive scoring method, the bid evaluation results are arranged in order from high to low after the evaluation. If the score is the same, they will be ranked in order of bidding** from lowest to highest. Score and bid** are tied.

The bidding documents meet all the substantive requirements of the bidding documents, and the bidder with the highest evaluation score is the first winning candidate according to the quantitative indicators of the evaluation factors. A new change in Order 87 is to allow tie-in-place candidates when ranking the winning candidates. If the lowest bid evaluation price method is adopted, the bid evaluation results are arranged in order from low to high in the bidding **, and the bidding ** is the same; If the comprehensive scoring method is adopted, the bid evaluation results are arranged in order from high to low after the evaluation, and the same score is arranged in the order of bidding ** from low to high, and the score and bid ** are the same.

If it is necessary to make an arithmetic correction to the bid ** or to implement the ** deduction of the **procurement policy in accordance with Article 54 of Order No. 87, the above bid ** refers to the adjusted bid**.

No more than three successful candidates should be awarded for a single lot. If the first winning candidate is two tied bidders, the other winning candidate shall be third. If the first successful candidate is a tie of three bidders, there shall be no other winning candidates.

If there are more than three winning candidates in the first ranking, since Order No. 87 allows the winning candidates to tie, although inconsistent with the provisions of the Tendering and Bidding Law, the special provisions of the procurement laws and regulations shall take precedence, in which case the number of winning candidates tied for the first place can exceed three.

In accordance with Article 10 of the Law on Bidding and Bidding, bidding is divided into open bidding and invitation to bid. Public bidding refers to the tenderer inviting unspecified legal persons or other organizations to bid in the form of tender announcements. Invitation to bid refers to the invitation of the tenderer to invite a specific legal person or other organization to bid in the form of an invitation to bid.

1) Public bidding, that is, the tenderer in accordance with the legal procedures, in the designated newspapers and periodicals, electronic networks and other media to publish the tender announcement, to the public to publicize its bidding requirements, to attract many potential bidders to participate in the bidding competition, the tenderer according to the pre-specified procedures and methods from which to select the winning bidder's bidding method.

2) Invitation to bid, that is, the tenderer through market research, according to the contractor or the contractor's credit, performance and other conditions, select a certain number of legal persons or other organizations (not less than 3), to issue a bidding invitation, invite it to participate in the bidding competition, the tenderer according to the pre-specified procedures and methods from which to select the winning bidder's bidding method.

Summary. Dear, I am glad to receive your question, what are the responsibilities that need to be performed when the public bidding goods procurement project and the bid evaluation expert review, for you to inquire, 1Bid evaluation experts should strengthen learning, familiar with the relevant laws and regulations of bidding, and master the latest knowledge in the professional field; Abide by the law, obey management, cherish honor, strictly abide by professional ethics, conscientiously perform job responsibilities, and assume corresponding responsibilities 2

The bid evaluation expert must enter the bid evaluation site before the time node required by the notice, close the communication tool, and store it in the designated place. 3.Before the formal evaluation of the bid, the bid evaluation expert must elect the director of the bid evaluation committee.

4.During the bid evaluation period, the bid evaluation experts are prohibited from leaving the bid evaluation area. If you really need to leave, you must apply and be approved by the relevant leaders, and you are not allowed to enter again after leaving, and at the same time have the responsibility of confidentiality for the opening of the bid evaluation, I hope my answer will be helpful to you.

Have a great day.

What are the responsibilities that need to be performed when the bid evaluation experts review the goods procurement projects in public bidding.

Dear, I am glad to receive your question, what are the responsibilities that need to be performed when the public bidding goods procurement project and the bid evaluation expert review, for you to inquire, 1Bid evaluation experts should strengthen learning, be familiar with the relevant laws and regulations of bidding, and master the latest knowledge in the professional field of Qiaoshengshi; Abide by the law, obey management, cherish honor, strictly abide by professional ethics, conscientiously perform job responsibilities, and assume corresponding responsibilities 2The bid evaluation expert must enter the bid evaluation site before the time node required by the notice, close the communication tool, and store it in the designated place.

3.Before the formal evaluation of the bid, the bid evaluation expert must elect the director of the bid evaluation committee. 4.

During the bid evaluation period, the bid evaluation experts are prohibited from leaving the bid evaluation area. If you really need to leave, you must apply for filial piety and be approved by the relevant leaders before you can laugh away, and you are not allowed to enter again after leaving, and at the same time have the responsibility of confidentiality for the relevant situation of the bid evaluation, I hope my answer will be helpful to you. Have a great day.

Dear, rent from the "Shenzhen Special Economic Zone ** Procurement Regulations (2012 Revision)" Chapter 2 ** Procurement Participants Article 17 If the EPS review experts participate in the ** procurement, they shall perform the following duties: (1) Abide by the review discipline and provide independent, objective and fair review opinions; (2) If violations are discovered, a report shall be made in a timely manner, (3) Answering inquiries or questions about the review work; (4) Other duties provided for by laws and regulations.

The comprehensive scoring method first lies in the setting of the ratio between business and technical scores, and then the program for calculating business scores and the original rules for evaluating technical scores. **Centralized procurement business and technical score from He Huai judged 2 8 to 5 5 open, pay attention to the proportion of business score in the front, since it is a comprehensive score is to focus on the technical level of competition. Decentralized procurement (the procurement project organized by the unit from Zen to the organization) does not clearly stipulate, you can first divide the proportion of business score and technical score according to the complexity of the technical requirements of the goods or services you procure, and the proportion of technical score of complex projects should be higher than that of business scores, and then subdivide the specific requirements of the project in the technical score demarcation.

Answer]: There are four commonly used bid evaluation methods for goods procurement, namely, the bid evaluation method based on the lowest bid evaluation price, the comprehensive bid evaluation method, the bid evaluation method based on the life cycle cost and the scoring method.

A bid evaluation method based on the lowest evaluation price. When purchasing simple goods, semi-finished products, raw materials, and other goods with the same performance and quality or easy to compare, wear and tear can be the only factor considered in the bid evaluation. When taking ** as the scale, it does not refer to the lowest **, but refers to the lowest evaluation price.

The lowest evaluation price has its own calculation criteria, that is, cost plus profit. Among them, the profit is a reasonable profit, and the cost also has its own specific calculation caliber.

Comprehensive bid evaluation method. The comprehensive bid evaluation method refers to the bid evaluation method based on ** plus other factors.

A bid evaluation method based on the cost of life cycle slippage. When purchasing equipment such as a complete plant, production line, equipment, and vehicles that have high follow-up costs (spare parts, oil, fuel maintenance, etc.) during the operation period, the bid evaluation method based on life cycle cost can be adopted.

Scoring. A variety of factors are usually considered in the bid evaluation, in order to facilitate comprehensive consideration, and facilitate comparison, the proportion of these factors can be determined according to the importance of these factors, and each factor is blind and does not know the score.