Why didn t I hear of the way of destroying the Buddha in ancient times, but I often said that I woul

Because Taoism pays attention to the absence of conflict with the world, it does not have much influence on the state power, on the contrary, the influence of Buddhism is much greater, so there is the destruction of Buddha but not the destruction of the Tao.

Because Taoism has existed since ancient times, while Buddhism is a religion that has been transmitted from India, some emperors in ancient times did not like Buddhism very much and often carried out the campaign to exterminate Buddhism.

Because Taoism has never been involved in secular struggles, nor does it have the ability to demagogue.

Buddha threatens the imperial power, showing that the people believe in Buddhism and do not work, the country has less taxes, and there are monk temples everywhere, do you want to replace the imperial palace?

Hehe, I don't read many books, the reason why there is a Buddha is because there are Taoist priests behind the push, if you don't believe it, go and look at the record of Tang Wuzong in the "History of the Tang Dynasty", there is no such thing as destroying Taoism because Buddhism has never thought of suppressing Taoism when it was powerful, even now on the Internet, Taoism attacks Buddhism more, and Buddhism rarely attacks Taoism.

Every time Buddhism flourishes, behind it is the decline and even extinction of a dynasty. The extermination of Buddhism was the instinctive reaction of the feudal dynasty itself to the serious damage caused by the parasitism of Buddhism.

Monks do not produce, do not filial piety to their parents, do not respect their ancestors, swagger and deceive, make money in a big way, go against the way of heaven, and sooner or later be destroyed by the way of heaven, the destruction of Buddha is the embodiment of the way of heaven, and it has not been destroyed because Buddhism still has the meaning of existence, and the mission has not been completed, but I believe that the day when Buddhism will die is not far away.

The Buddha was born in the Western Regions, which was imported. Taoism is native to China, adhering to Chinese thought, and is closely related to imperial rule and longevity.

Demon Bo Xun sent the demon descendants to destroy the Dharma. The demon wave is called the world-honored Nirvana, and it is also said that during the end of the Buddha's Dharma period, the demon descendants will be asked to enter the temple, wear robes, and misunderstand the Buddhist scriptures. (This is the end of the Dharma period).

Buddhism is a foreign culture, and it does not seem to be very popular in front of the local religions of the Central Plains.

But now it's freedom of belief, and discrimination against Buddhism is not as obvious as it used to be.

There is a very apt explanation for the difference between Taoism and Buddhism: Taoism solves the problem of the contradiction between man and nature; Buddhism solves the problems of the individual's heart, for the gap between the two sides, but also leads to the situation of each of them in the development of thousands of years, ** From time to time in history, there are emperors for various reasons, decreed to eliminate Buddhism from the court level, but the same sect Why was Taoism not decreed?

Looking at the characteristics of Buddhism first, it is determined that it needs to be deeply rooted in the hearts of the people, but going deep into the hearts of the people will make people's belief in Buddhism be improved, and people will begin to obey the arrangements of Buddhism. There is an ancient saying in our country that the one who wins the hearts of the people wins the world, after Buddhism came from ancient India, the development of that is called a rapid, unavoidable collision with the local sect of thought at that time, originally in the Western Han Dynasty, the great unification dynasty began to use Confucianism to govern the world, the situation at that time can prove that this choice is not true, and after the introduction of Buddhism, there was a conflict of ideas between the two sides, the influence of local Buddhism in ancient India was not large, only the influence of sesame seeds was even smaller, and it was well known that there were many sects in India, Not to mention ancient India, as far as the number of sects in today's India is concerned, the emperor's attitude is very crucial, once the emperor is dissatisfied with any sect, just a holy decree can completely destroy the sect.

But Taoism and Buddhism are very different, most of the stereotypes of Taoism are very mysterious, idle clouds and wild cranes, ethereal immortals, such as Jiang Ziya, fairy, for the ancients who are too lacking in knowledge, the mystery of Taoism, the sense of birth makes people sigh, so Taoism will not conflict with other ideas, and it will not cause the emperor to attach great importance to it, the last most important point of view The development of Buddhism will occupy a lot of national resources and affect the imperial court's taxes. For the imperial court, taxation is the foundation of wealth, and the expenses of the imperial court's officers and soldiers, the bureaucracy, and the royal family can only be obtained through taxation, where does the taxation come from? Of course, it's the common people, think about it, the resources and taxes of the common people are used to develop Buddhism, who still has the spare money for your court? Therefore, the emperor's eradication of Buddhism was also justified.

Because the influence of Buddhism is too great, Buddhist temples occupy a large amount of land, but temples have no obligation to pay taxes, and a large number of monks and nuns also occupy a large number of productive population, which has caused a huge burden on the imperial court.

Taoism, on the other hand, advocates non-action, and its influence is not as great as that of Buddhism, and the land, population, and wealth it occupies are nothing to the country.

Therefore, destroy the Buddha without destroying the Tao.

Taoism pursues nothingness, escapism, and has no influence on the authorities

Because Taoism is a native religion and is beneficial to the rulers, while Buddhism is a foreign religion and is harmful to the rulers.

After all, Buddhism was imported from abroad, unlike Taoism, which was produced locally, and the teachings of Buddhism were not as popular with the rulers as the teachings of Taoism.

Because Buddhism is a foreign religion, it is a bit different from Chinese society, and likes to accumulate wealth, while Taoism is a local force, which likes to be quiet and relatively low-key.

The reasons why the rulers of China only destroyed the Buddha and did not destroy the Tao include, in my opinion, the following:Taoism arose in China and is more compatible with China's traditional culture; And compared to Buddhism, Taoism is not so utilitarian.

China's ideology can be traced back to the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, when a hundred schools of thought contended, a hundred flowers bloomed, and various ideas splashed each other on the land of China.

Taoism and Buddhism have the most profound influence on politics and religion along with China's ideology. Throughout history, we have found that the rulers of China only destroyed the Buddha but not the Tao, and the reasons for this include:

Taoism arose in China and is more compatible with China's traditional culture;

Taoism arose in the Spring and Autumn Period, which can be said to be in the same lineage; Whereas, Buddhism originated in India. The feudal rule of our country in successive dynasties was based on Confucianism, and the teachings in Buddhism emphasized the abandonment of desires, family, and ethics, and the pursuit of an ethereal state of the heart, which contradicted Confucian orthodoxy. On the contrary, the Taoist theory of gossip and the theory of the conjunction of yin and yang are the theories that rulers of the past generations aspired to, and were used to study longevity and immortality.

In the same way, the theory of the conjunction of yin and yang makes people understand that they complement each other, which are all treasures of Chinese culture.

Compared to Buddhism, Taoism is not so utilitarian

Since the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, Buddhism has spread from the western part of our country to the interior little by little, and by the time of the Tang Dynasty, it began to be widely propagated among the people. People worship the Buddha and think that the Buddha is the gospel and will give incense money to him, which makes Buddhism very rich to a certain extent. In the era of relying on the sky for food and natural and man-made disasters, the emperor would give priority to killing the rich and helping the poor, and giving money to the poor people; Taoism, on the other hand, seems so indifferent to fame and fortune, which allows it to be preserved.

This is because Taoism is less utilitarian than Buddhism, and Taoism arose in our country.

Many emperors hoped to achieve immortality by believing in Taoism and various alchemy, but there were fewer emperors who believed in Buddhism.

Historically, the literati have interpreted the Tao as ruling by inaction and conforming to nature, which is exactly what the ruler wants, eating, drinking, and having fun all day long, not doing anything, leaving the people to fend for themselves, how comfortable it is, why destroy him?

The origin of Taoism is China, and Buddhism is a foreign religion, although it is now common in China, it took many years to realize.

This is because many of the ideas proclaimed in Buddhism are in line with some of the ideas that the rulers want to advocate, and are more conducive to the rule of the state.

That's because Taoism was born in our country and is the same as our country's traditional culture, and Buddhism was imported from abroad, and it is still somewhat unsuitable for the rule of the ruler.

Compared with Taoism, a native religion, Buddhism, a foreign religion, has many contradictions with the entire Confucian culture, the most obvious difference is that Buddhism advocates the abandonment of family and relatives, while Confucianism pays great attention to ethics and family.

Because Taoism is our own culture, and Buddhism is a foreign culture, the rulers feel that this is the invasion of foreign culture, and they want to establish their own culture.

Compared with Taoism, a native religion, Buddhism, a foreign religion, is not completely compatible with ancient Chinese society, or in other words, it has many contradictions with the entire Confucian culture.

Because the influence of Buddhism was too great, Buddhist temples occupied a large amount of land but had no obligation to pay taxes, and a large number of monks occupied the productive population, which caused a burden on the imperial court. Taoism, on the other hand, advocates non-action, has little influence, and occupies land, population, and wealth that are nothing to the state.

This is mainly because Taoism originated in China and is the embodiment of China's traditional culture, which is very important.