How to write a review essay, how to write a review sample essay

The review is generally divided into four parts, and the following are some of the requirements for writing a review:

1. Foreword: The review of ** also needs to write a preface, the preface needs to write the purpose of writing and the introduction of relevant concepts and the scope of the review, etc., generally about 200-300 words.

2. Main body: The main part is the main part of the review, this part needs to write about 2500 words, this part is written in different ways, but it is necessary to write the induction and summary of the literature you refer to, clarify some historical background and research status and comment on some issues.

3. Summary: This part generally needs to write 200-300 words, this part needs to write some summary of the main part, some evaluation of the main part and then put forward, here you need to have your own views and some personal opinions.

Note.

Usually, the review of ** does not need to be checked, but the specific requirements still depend on whether the school stipulates that the review part of ** should be checked. And the summary of ** is generally attached to the end of ** in the form of an attachment, if you are required to check the duplicate, you can directly pass it on and the posture rent to the duplicate check system. As far as the omen is concerned, it is necessary to check the duplicate, and the duplicate check rate of this part will not be included in the final ** duplicate check result.

Here's how to write a review:

Step 1. Decide on a topic.

The topic selection of the review article should be specific and clear, the scope should not be too large, and it should be innovative. Preferably, it is a disease or field related to your department or experimental platform topic. Also look at those high-scoring articles, how did their authors choose?

What are the core innovations in distilling each similar review? What could be the biggest innovation of your review? How does the complete logic of these high-scoring articles string together?

What do I need to analyze if I want to analyze this latitude? What other studies do I need to collect? How to do ?..

Step 2. Collect and organize literature.

Once the topic has been decided, it is necessary to search for relevant literature. The English literature databases commonly used in the field of medical research include PubMed, Web of Science and Embase, and the Chinese databases include CNKI and Wanfang. Sharing a scientific and reasonable literature reading method can ensure that the most complete literature and modular data can be obtained in the research, and at the same time, it can avoid increasing the redundant workload.

Step 3. Write an article officially.

Compared with the general original research (article), the review often needs to carefully sort out and summarize the complex literature, which is more challenging for the researcher's writing ability.

Therefore, before formally writing a review, the author suggests that researchers should list the writing framework of the article.

Specifically, it should include the headings, subheadings and which documents to be cited under the subheadings, what issues are mainly discussed in the summary, etc., and carry out repeated scrutiny, so that the structure of the article is rigorous and the writing ideas are clear.

Step 4. Other writing pitfalls of the review.

In addition to the above, many students will also fall into misunderstandings in the writing process:

1. The topic is too big or too small.

2 Nothing but commentary.

3 Inaccurate language and unclear structure.

4. Highlight the key points and draw vague conclusions.

1.Preface. Like general science and technology, the preface, also known as the introduction, is the part that guides the reader to the topic, mainly describing the purpose and role of the review, outlining the relevant concepts and definitions of the topic, briefly describing the historical background, development process, current situation, focus of controversy, application value and practical significance of the selected topic, and at the same time can limit the scope of the review so that the reader has a preliminary impression of the topic of the review.

This part is about 200 300 words.

2.Main body.

The main part of the review is particularly large, with a short range of about 5,000 words and an elderly version of tens of thousands of words.

Generally, it can be divided into several large parts according to the content of the main part, and each part is marked with a short and eye-catching subheading. The criteria for distinguishing some are also varied, some by chronology, some by issue, some by different arguments, and some by stage of development.

However, no matter what method is adopted, it should include three aspects: historical development, review of the current situation and development prospects.

(1) Historical development: In chronological order, briefly describe the ins and outs of the topic, the development overview and the level of research at each stage.

2) Review of the current situation: the focus is to discuss the current research status at home and abroad, focus on commenting on which problems have been solved and which problems have not been solved, and propose possible solutions; The current focus of controversy, comparing the similarities and differences of various viewpoints and making theoretical explanations, and highlighting the author's point of view; Introduce in detail theories and hypotheses that are creative and promising, and draw arguments to point out possible development trends.

3) Qi Jingjing before development**: through vertical and horizontal comparison, affirm the research level of the topic, point out the existing problems, put forward possible development trends, point out the research direction, and suggest the shortcut of research.