What measures and systems are in place to restrain bribery in democratic elections in European and A

First of all, you have to understand that bribery is part of democracy! Election bribery is inherently inevitable. People can give up their labor and time to get paid, so why can't they give up their political rights to get paid?

In essence, isn't politicians' bottomless promises of national welfare also bribery? Isn't promising to prioritize illegal immigration also a vote bribe? Do you have to take a ticket to slap you in the face to be considered a bribe?

Let me tell you how to restrain bribery? In order to avoid bribery, the people who founded the United States decided that only the owners of estates with real estate in the United States had the right to vote, because the finances of the owners of the estates were independent, so the votes would be independent, and bribery could be avoided. We have all seen what the result is and what it is today,,, so bribery is a part of democracy.

Unless you want to engage in some aristocratic elite democracy. When the time comes, I will say that you are an oligarchy, not a democracy. What kind of freedom of the press, ** supervision, judicial independence, you think there was no when the country was founded.

It's better to bribe a voter than not to have a vote.

The United States is a super representative system, universal suffrage is just a pretense, when there is no serious conflict between universal suffrage and the interests of the ruling class, the super deputies will acquiesce in the results of universal suffrage, if there is a serious conflict of interests, super deputies do not need to vote according to the popular vote, they can decide who will be the **. There have been several times in history when superrepresentatives in several states have voted for candidates who have lost the results of the state's popular vote.

I haven't even seen us with the votes, so I'm not qualified to judge this matter, so let's take a break, but let me tell you, the current elected system in the United States is recognized as one of the fairest electoral systems in the world, and this can be regarded as an answer for you, and I am really helping you look forward to adopting

The United States **** will be held on November 3 this year, and this election is related to the future direction of the United States and the world. At present, the relationship between China and the United States is tense, and there is even the possibility of further conflict in the future. The ancients said:

Know yourself and know your opponent, and you will not be defeated in a hundred battles. Therefore, it is very necessary to understand the United States.

Both China and the United States are indirect elections, and each state in the United States first elects a representative of the people, and then they elect **. China is to elect deputies to the National People's Congress, and then to the Prime Minister and Chairman. However, the United States is the largest and the largest, and China is the prime minister responsibility system, the prime minister is the person in charge, that is, he is in charge of specific practical matters, and the chairman (Politburo) is the one who decides the country's major policies.

Content from user: I'm just a soldier.

Elections in the United States are indirect. First, the voters of each state vote for the electors of their own state (the number of members of Congress in their own state), and then the electors of each state vote at the same time in the capital of each state to elect the president and vice-president**. Parliamentarians are elected by direct election.

Members of the House of Representatives are directly elected by voters in each state; Senators were originally elected by state legislatures, and the 17th Amendment to the Constitution, which came into effect in 1913, provided that senators were also directly elected by state voters. Governors, legislators, and judges in some states, important executives, are elected by voters. Elections at all levels are generally bipartisan.

In order to ensure the dominance of the two parties, a single-member constituency system and a majority representation system are generally implemented.

Benefits of the US Electoral System Generally speaking, the US electoral system is effective, and after more than 200 years of development, it has become relatively mature, and it is still being reformed and improved. The entire electoral process was orderly and transparent, and the results were publicly recognized. Elections have the following functions:

First, elections allow for the transfer or continuation of power to proceed peacefully. Elections are the only legal way to gain state power, and there is no other way for anyone to hold state power than to participate in elections. Even if the authorities are controlled by other means, such as a coup d'état, their power will not be recognized by the public.

This basically excludes the possibility of political turmoil in the country and even civil war caused by the struggle for state power. Second, elections are an important way for voters to exercise their democratic power. There are many ways to realize the democratic rights of Americans, such as freedom of speech, but elections are the most important way, and the main motivation for voters to vote is to exercise their power.

In the United States, it is completely voluntary for voters to participate in elections, and it is illegal to force voters to vote through various means. Second, the expensive game for the rich. Campaign costs in the United States are on the rise.

Elections in the United States are typical of money politics (

The United States often refers to the three concepts of "term", "appointment" and "position" in the United States, which have different meanings.

With regard to "term", the U.S. Constitution stipulates that elections are held once every four years, and a term is held after four years. If the term of office is not completed for any reason, and another person takes over, the two are the same term.

Regarding "appointment", it refers to the number of times the position is held. One person holds several ** positions, and is still one term. However, a person has been elected several times in several non-consecutive ** elections, and several times he is elected is counted as several terms.

With regard to "bit", it refers to the actual number of people who have served as **. Since the beginning of the election** in the United States, whether it is re-elected or re-elected, it has not been counted twice, and there are several counts.

Leigh: The promises you made before you came to power were tempting.

Disadvantages: It is difficult to fulfill the promises made after taking office.

benefit, entertainment for all;

Cons, a waste of resources.