What do you think of copying painters?

Learning words began to start from the red step by step, copying is the only way, and the future development depends on each person.

Copying the excellent works of predecessors is the best shortcut to learning, and then the foreign teacher can get the source of the heart.

Human development ......Let's start with the touch!

Copying is the most advanced practice method, is it difficult to be original?

Copying is a kind of craft learning method, only through copying can really master some techniques, from ancient times to the present many accomplished masters have this kind of learning process and experience, good is also a kind of ability, not everyone can do it really.

Copying is a compulsory course in painting, and it is also the essence of learning from others.

Jincheng and Zhang Daqian all relied on copying.

It is required as a means of practice. But as a work of art, it is stolen.

Chinese painting began with the copying of paintings, and Western painting began with the copying of real objects.

Copying is the most basic homework for the first time in painting, it is also difficult to copy a good one, don't think that copying is not good, just ask you how good you are, look at a good work, can you reach the level of the copied work?

There are benefits to learning other people's techniques.

I think it's okay to express the copied works, express your respect, and don't be found out and don't admit it, most painters don't have their own ideas at first.

Copying is the only way to learn the art of painting.

Learning Chinese painting mainly relies on copying, and learning Western painting copying is also a way to acquire basic skills.

There is no innovation without copying, copying is an indispensable means to improve the technique, and any master has the experience of copying.

Wu Guanzhong said well, copying is to feel the feeling in other people's slippers and finally throw it away, so there is no harm in copying.

Copying can only be used as a method of learning! It is used to learn other people's techniques. If you commoditize copying work, it is pure plagiarism! It's a moral issue. For example, what happens when a singer sings someone else's original song and performs everywhere? Can you say he's a singer?

I think that copying painters should be respected, every type should be respected and loved, and copying is also a kind of respect for paintings.

Painters who copy also need basic skills, they may lack a little creativity, but they will be very engaged and have good skills.

I think that copying painters lacks innovation, and they just blindly copy other people's works, and they can't really create their own style.

I said that it is not complete to draw badly, it depends on how you understand and use it, don't rely too much on external factors, first of all, you must clarify your goals, that is the most important thing.

It is possible that they use copying other people's works to exercise their painting skills, and there is also a lack of fame and need famous works to make money.

In addition to copying famous paintings by masseurs, British painters also increased their skills by copying albums. After all, human learning basically starts with imitation.

New and not good, better than good but not new, good restraint is far better than mediocre unrestrained, copying is in place, learning is very profound, far stronger than low cultivation blind toss.

I bought a lot of paintings by a painter, and in the end I found that all his paintings were copied, and none of them were my own. Since then I have never bought his paintings again, I am so disappointed that a painter who has not copied a single piece of his work can only be called a painter instead of a painter.

Copying painting is a stage of learning to paint, just like learning calligraphy and learning calligraphy