Why is a good person not a good person if he does a bad thing? Bad people are good people when they

Because most people have a kind of habitual thinking, good people must always be good people and do not do bad things, if they do bad things, even if it is just one, they must be completely denied and become good people. As for the bad guy, he is too magnanimous, as long as he does a good deed, he will often attract everyone's praise.

In fact, this is a very wrong understanding, and people should allow good people to make mistakes, observe bad people more, and never generalize.

Good people and bad people are relative, good is not absolutely good, bad is not absolutely bad, if the first cause effect makes us judge that the good side of this person is dominant, then he has done bad things to make us feel that he is not so good; In the same way, if we judge that a person's bad side is dominant, then if he does good things, we feel that he is not so bad.

This is like a bucket of rice to raise a benefactor, and a stone of rice to raise an enemy. A bucket of rice to raise a benefactor is a person who is about to starve to death, and if you give him a bucket of rice to save him, he will be very grateful to you and thank you for saving his life. One stone of rice to support the enemy is when a person is about to starve to death, you continue to help him and give him one stone of rice.

After that, he will not give it to him anymore, and he will be resentful. I hate you for not giving him anything to eat anymore. A bad guy doing a good deed doesn't prove that he's a good person.

But once the good people do the bad things. Everyone has an opinion about him. People should still be based on good, not evil.

People are doing it, and the sky is watching! It's always good to do good.

In people's traditional beliefs, good people don't do bad things. Then if you do something bad, you are not really a good person. Rather, a pseudo-good guy.

Generally speaking, the words of a bad person are to do all the bad things, and never do good things. If he did a good deed, then it was discovered by conscience. Prove that he is not a bad person.

He's a good guy at heart.

The prejudice in people's hearts is a big mountain.

For example, if there is a person who bullies you a lot, one day he suddenly stops bullying you, and then treats you very well, will you change your opinion of him?

Another example is that if someone is very good to you, and one day he suddenly beats you, scolds you, and bullies you, will you feel unbalanced and uncomfortable, and feel that he was not like this before.

These are all stereotypes, a good person should be in the hearts of others should be like this to do good deeds, he has done a bad thing, people's stereotypes are destroyed, so they will feel that he is not a good person, it is different from imagination.

And the same is true for the bad guys.

Because people have a fixed mind, he always thinks that this person has always done good things, and it is impossible for him to do bad things. But if he does a bad thing, it is the kind that is unforgivable. But the bad guy is different, this person always does bad things, and suddenly his conscience finds out, and he will feel that this person has turned back.

In fact, this is just a matter of ideology.

Because they think that no matter how many good people do good things, they will be jealous in their eyes and think that good people are very pretentious, and bad people will feel that bad people are good people when they do a good thing, and they will feel that bad people are good people if they have a little conscience.

Because you are a good person, you become bad, and the result is bad. So it's the bad guys. The bad guys get better, and the results are good. So it's good guys.

In fact, this is just everyone's opinion, everyone's positioning is different, what you see may not be true, in fact, you don't need other people's eyes, how to do your own good, worthy of your conscience, what do others think? Don't bother with it.

If you look at the problem rationally, there will not be so many problems. Who said that? Wait for this question to be recognized by the vast majority of people, and then sigh! Rational people look at people, things, and influences. And not emotional judgment.

If a good person does a bad thing, he is not a good person, and if a bad person does a good thing, he is not a good person, or it is normal.

Yes, if you are a bad person and do a good deed all your life, then it means that he has changed his evil ways, and if you do a bad thing as a good person all your life, it means that he is also bad.

That's what everyone thinks. I can't help it, I swear to be a good man, but there are always rumors about me. Now I feel too tired, and I feel pretty good trying to get revenge on those scum.

What the fuck good guys bad guys, let them go! Be myself!

There is a saying that puts down the butcher's knife and becomes a Buddha on the ground.

Why is a good person not a good person if he does a bad thing? Bad people are good people when they do good deeds? The world does not allow a single stain on a blank piece of paper.

Buddhism has a saying that human nature is inherently evil, and through the influence of the human world, doing good deeds washes away filth. The three-character scripture says: At the beginning of man, his nature is good. It's just that the acquired habits and experiences lead to the good side being covered up.

In any case, whether it is good or evil, in short, people's character is not eternal, but in a process of dynamic change; People are more receptive to "bad people doing good things" than "good people doing bad things". Although not absolute, for the former, people always spit on more than understand.

There is an interesting phenomenon in human memory: people are always fond of beginning impressions and recent impressions. Just like a piece of writing, the beginning and end are always impressive; That's why people always emphasize the importance of first impressions.

And the biggest difference between "bad people doing good things" and "good people doing bad things" is the recent impression. "Good person" is the beginning of the impression, "doing bad things" is the recent impression, and those who know it well may sigh and sympathize with his experience. Those who are not in the know only take recent impressions, so it is understandable not to understand or even abuse.

Therefore, it is not possible to simply take things at face value. Referring only to the fact that "good people do bad things", maybe this "good person" is not a good person in the real sense, but he is better disguised? Maybe this "bad thing" may become a "good thing" in the future.

For different people at different times, the value of the same thing is also changing, how can it be generalized!