What is the psychology of people who are interested in damaging shared bicycles?

The heart is very vicious, but the cowardice does not dare to do the most vicious and bad things, so they can vent in this way, and they can indirectly hurt others, and they will be very happy.

Sometimes it is true that shared bicycles occupy the road where pedestrians walk, obstructing traffic, making some people in a hurry very angry, and they will spill their anger on the car and damage them.

There are a lot of bear children who deliberately spread bad psychology, and now bear children can do any bad thing, relying on their young age to be protected by others, protected by law, and reckless.

Jealous people will fall into the well, there is such a person around me, professional behind the plot, today the plot is present, tomorrow and show you good to prepare for the next plot, again and again to the simple-minded people are unguardable, repeated tricks are so, for example, ask others can not borrow a bicycle to go home and punch and kick the bicycle, I wonder if this is a person, go to steal the copper wire and return all the keys to you, there is a conspiracy in this!

They just want to cause trouble to others, and then they will have the pleasure of succeeding in their schemes, which is very childish and boring.

They just lack a sense of existence, can't play a role in life, can't do anything big, and can only find a sense of existence by destroying shared bicycles.

Some rebellious children like to get attention by destroying other people's things, and this way proves that they are the boss.

If you are dissatisfied with the society or the things you encounter in your daily life, but you are cowardly, you can only use shared bicycles to vent, so you will not be held responsible.

I have seen a lot of children scratch with knives***, their psychology is that they are too young, they don't have mobile phones, they can't use shared bicycles, and they don't let others use them.

Shared bicycles abandoned by people, merchants who don't keep their promises, don't return the deposit and complain about others damaging the bicycle?

I wish all shared bicycles to be removed from the shelves as soon as possible, because the quality of the riders is too good and the parking is neat.

Stop playing with psychology and get your deposit back!

Do you feel guilty about the bicycle company that doesn't refund the deposit?

I've picked nearly 10 locked cars.

If you don't like it, it's okay, please don't hurt, enterprises and people must have a sense of public morality.

Use cleaners and sanitation workers to manage shared bikes.

Cleaners, each road has a special cleaner management, they have a low income, in addition to cleaning the street in the morning and evening, they also need to be on the road at all times. Give them some subsidies and let them manage the bikes on the road by the way.

1.User's personal issues.

Although the shared bicycle is put by the enterprise, it represents the public nature to a certain extent, and it is not the private property of a single person, and it is not that a user rents it and then only uses it by one person, but many people use it. In fact, for public property, many people's evil content has been released, we can often see buses, scenic spots and other places suffered from man-made malicious damage, more common in the scenic area lettering, there are people do not pay attention to the scenic spot open defecation, similar behavior is not a few, and more hateful incidents are also a lot. The situation is similar in places such as shared bicycles and scenic spots.

2.There are loopholes in management.

Its management loopholes are manifested in the fact that the user is in the form of magnetic card and *** in the process of returning the car, but one of the main bodies is audited, not the whole vehicle is audited from beginning to end, that is, in addition to the core components, other places, even if the user unloads the tire, it can still be returned.

It is impossible for bike-sharing companies to conduct a very detailed inspection of each vehicle, and their current focus is on developing the number and scale of users, so it naturally does not take much effort at the audit level. Bicycles are not like cars, users may rent cars in the car rental line, and when they are finally returned, people will have an inspection, bicycles, first of all, it is cheaper, and secondly, the number of users is too large, if according to the data agency, ofo + Mobike's volume will exceed 1.2 million, and 1.2 million vehicles will be reviewed frequently and in detail, which consumes manpower, material resources, and financial resources are relatively huge. Ofo and Mobike are also powerless to do this.

3.Parking Conflicts.

At present, the problem of the parking area of each bike-sharing company has not been completely solved, and the parking of many bicycles is not clear, and some users, because the shared bicycle is not their own, so they park indiscriminately, and other users see this "indiscriminately parked" bicycle, which may be in their way, once no one takes care of it, others will inevitably give the bicycle some "lessons", this situation is not uncommon.

1. The main problem is the quality of the Chinese people.

2. The amount of bicycles is too small to meet the needs of consumers, so consumers use various methods to forcibly occupy 3, which damages the interests of other similar service businesses.

4.The company's protection and management measures were not followed.

5.Other.

As a new thing, bicycle sharing has encountered many problems in the process of DU promotion, and the first thing to bear the brunt of is the situation of sharing bicycles. For acts that damage shared bicycles: Article 275 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China provides:

Where public or private property is intentionally destroyed, and the amount is relatively large or there are other serious circumstances, a sentence of up to 3 years imprisonment, short-term detention, or a fine is to be given. Where public or private property is intentionally destroyed, where the amount is huge or there are other especially serious circumstances, a sentence of between 3 and 7 years imprisonment is to be given.

And these people still have a fluke mentality, thinking that this is a public thing, and others can't say anything about themselves, but you must know that the embodiment of low quality is not only in this thing, if you don't pay attention to it at all, then someone in the society will definitely educate you in the future, so we have to start from small things.

I don't think they have a sense of morality. Bicycle sharing is the property of the public, and they litter public resources, that is, they have no public morality.

I think such people are very selfish in their hearts, and they always feel that they can put whatever they want after riding a bicycle, and they don't have to think about other people's feelings, in fact, they do a lot of trouble for others.

I think they are a kind of immoral psychology, and they always feel that this kind of behavior can be convenient for themselves, but it brings a lot of harm to others.

I saw that the people who vandalized the bikes were all children, throwing rocks!

The quality is poor, and his sesame score must be very low.

I'm in Chengdu, nearly two bai

Month-sharing bicycle du became popular, and all kinds of dao bicycles within the 2nd ring road of Chengdu City have the most Mobike. Yongan and so on, and then Rong last month Chengdu local brand 1-step bicycle also joined. The day before yesterday, Shanghai Permanent also announced that it would join the cycling.

Therefore, the potential market of shared bicycles is still relatively attractive. Then, with the addition of shared bicycles, it will definitely touch the interests of people at the relevant levels, and the most direct is the black motorcycle, the three wheels, etc., they rely on this to eat an example: Hongjiapo to the Zhaojue Temple bus station or to the zoo, the three wheels or the black motorcycle 5-8 pieces, and the bicycle 1 piece will be done.

They must not be happy that their family-raising business is blocked, so there have been reports of damaged bicycles, etc., and I am not deliberately pointing out here that they did it, in case there are still peers, right?

A selfish expression appears (because it is not your own).

It can only be said that there are still people with low quality, and of course I don't feel distressed if it's not my own.

The impact of the Internet economy such as online car-hailing and bicycle sharing.

Some traditional industries have been violently impacted by DAOs. Accustomed to.

In the face of challenges and pressures, some drivers of black cars and motorcycles are difficult to adapt to, and they put the "board" on the shared bicycle; Bike-sharing is like an unwelcome intruder and saboteur, becoming the "culprit" that breaks some people's jobs.

The Chinese population base is large. Cities are densely populated.

Therefore, no matter how many shared bikes there are, it is impossible to have one per person. That's a lot.

People complain that they go out in the morning or do other things, and walk a long way just to ride a shared bicycle, but they are just like catching the bus, just arrived and just got ridden. Although I want to scold my mother, I still want to ride. Just hold back your temper and continue to look for the next car.

The next one was good, I was only halfway through when someone else rode away. It is still not far from the surrounding cars to collect the surrounding cars. I haven't ridden it for so long, and if I take the bus, I should now lie down on the soft sofa under the air conditioning at home and drink water!

And then. I'm riding one today. Mine rode it to my house so I could ride it for two more days!

Of course, the quality is not too high, maybe it will vent violently) (there are some that don't have any software ratings, and the jealousy is a little stronger, and people are a little bit picky).

This incident reflects the quality of the people from the side, although zhi

We DAO has fully implemented compulsory education for many years, and the overall quality of the country's people has also improved, but from the experience of sharing bicycles, there are still a lot of "Diao people" among the people.

The development of the legal system in China is not yet perfect, which has given the public the illusion that the law does not hold the people accountable. Many people know the version.

It is wrong to destroy shared bicycles, but there are very few people who are punished for destroying shared bicycles, which gives these "bad people" the courage to continue to do evil. It reminds me of Singapore, when you spit, run a red light, and get a serious penalty of caning, we think that city management is not that difficult.

The emergence of any new thing is bound to be accompanied by some new problems. But as things develop and mature further. Some of people's resistance and contradictions will slowly tend to get used to and adapt!

Have faith in the future. And I believe that the future will be better!

From the moment the shared bicycle appeared, it was a rocket-like development speed, and while it was developing rapidly, it ignored the development of vehicles.

management capacity.

In particular, the ofo brand bicycles are the most seriously damaged due to the lack of a positioning system, and the bicycle sharing company is also negligent in daily management, so that a large number of defective vehicles appear on the street, bringing inconvenience and danger to cyclists.

There are two reasons why shared bikes break. The first aspect is that the quality of shared bikes is too poor. Many bicycles share the same quality as the bikes.

The shared bicycle that everyone sees, the most bad is the small yellow car, in fact, the quality of the small yellow car is indeed the worst, it is obvious to all. The quality of the product is designed. Mobike bikes are well designed, but there are fewer bad bikes.

If you don't do a good job of product quality, it will be broken. On the other hand, the placement is not standardized. The location of the shared bicycle basically occupies everyone's public resources.

Blind alleys are common in cities, and public transport is common. The impact on urban pedestrian passages is very large. If you have a greater influence on others, empathy, passers-by are likely to hurt the bike.

If it is not intentional damage, then compensation will do.

The crime of intentional destruction of property refers to the intentional destruction or damage of public or private property, where the amount is relatively large or there are other serious circumstances. The subject of this crime is a general subject, and any natural person who has reached the age of criminal responsibility and has the capacity for criminal responsibility can constitute this crime. Where public or private property is intentionally destroyed, and the amount is relatively large or there are other serious circumstances, a sentence of up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention, or a fine is to be given; where the amount is huge or there are other especially serious circumstances, a sentence of between three and seven years imprisonment is to be given.

The offence of intentional destruction of property is usually the result of some practical cause. The perpetrator may be motivated by retaliation against the owner of the property, or by jealousy or other similarly targeted psychological attitudes, and the destruction of property resulting in damage to the property of the owner is the purpose of the crime.

Destruction of public property! Cause bad social impact!