How do you get the referee to blow the black whistle?

Blowing the black whistle is a crime committed in broad daylight and should be punished severely.

If you want to talk about black whistles, I have to mention Fu Ming, Fu Ming, after reading **, he is still punished like this, there is a problem with his character, let Fu Ming write on the spot, see if he has the ability, only to prove the authenticity of his academic qualifications, and agree to it.

Those who violate professional ethics must be severely punished, severely punished for not taking out loans, collecting black money, and severely punishing them according to law.

A professional referee who blows a black whistle cannot be dealt with with by mistake, he is a judge on the court, and should be punished with professional anti-crime.

Who can say what the word "let" in the title means?

It is necessary to investigate to the end, rectify unhealthy trends, and dig deep into the reasons for blowing the black whistle behind the scenes.

First of all, we must figure out what is "referee" and "black whistle", and understand the meaning of "referee" and "black whistle", this problem is not difficult, at least fairness and justice can not be done, and it is deliberately done, this is the degradation of professional ethics, it is a crime!

He has this power, it's his profession, but if he's incompetent, he should be dismissed.

This kind of referee is just unprofessional, and the game should be kept fair and impartial, and if the referee blows the black whistle, I think he can be fired if necessary.

Sometimes the referee blows the black whistle because the referee misses the judgment or the individual is forced to make some unreasonable blowing penalties due to the pressure of the home team and considering the balance between the home and away teams.

I think I'm very disgusted with the referee blowing the black whistle, because in a game, we have to pay attention to fairness and justice, and we can't blindly take sides.

I think it's quite wrong for the referee to blow the black whistle, it shouldn't be done, it should be dealt with harshly.

I think most of the fans, including the commentators, don't understand the rules at all, and in their eyes, as long as it's not good for them, it's a black whistle. It's understandable mistakes in their own team's favor.

I feel like in general, it's when you foul and then the referee blows the black whistle.

The referee blew the black whistle and made a big mistake and should have asked about the situation and then punished this referee severely, because it is likely that he alone has affected the lives of several people.

All sports have referees, there must be referees, all events in the world referees can not have 100% accurate judgments, besides, a small mistake by the referee is allowed.

Of course, this is an unfair judgment that should be resolutely resisted, and the referee loses the fairness of the game because of his own interests.

I think it's very unfair, and as a referee, you should act in a fair way.

I think this will appear, but it shouldn't be rare, after all, the referee will take fairness and justice into account when choosing, after all, there are so many people.

It is a crime, and in such a regular game, his behavior is a violation of some rules, and it is a violation of the fairness.

Yes, such an act is already suspected of breaking the law. Once discovered, the referee will be permanently disqualified, and he will also be sentenced, which can be said to be a very serious end.

It is an illegal act, and it also violates the principle of fairness in sport, which is punishable by criminal detention.

01 The appearance of the referee's whistle was in 1875, by chance. At that time, a football game was chaotic due to the influx of spectators, and the game could not be carried out, so the referee had an idea, took out his siren and blew it, and the order on the field quickly returned to normal. After that, the referees on the football field began to use the whistle to make decisions, and it soon expanded to other matches.

Nowadays, in various sporting events, referees generally use the whistle as a signal for the penalty in addition to gestures.

China is a country that has had football for a long time, and football referees have also appeared in ancient China very early. There was a person named Li You in the Later Han Dynasty, who once wrote a "Ju Cheng Ming", which used four inscriptions to tell us that some of the adjudication principles at that time were not to be intimate and unselfish, and to be calm and calm, and not to complain. That is to say, referees should be impartial, impartial, and distinguish between right and wrong in the process of football matches, which can be regarded as the world's earliest record of football refereeing work.

Football referees began in England in 1863. However, the referees were only outside the field and did not enter the field, and the referees did not use whistles at that time, but only relied on loud shouts and corresponding hand gestures to referee. At that time, due to the large field of football matches and the large number of people watching the ball, as the game was tense, the audience would burst into applause and cheers from time to time, and although the referee shouted loudly on the sidelines, it was still difficult for the players playing in the stadium to hear his referee clearly.

In this case, the referee had to change the work done off the field to inside the field and start using the whistle in order to achieve better results.

There are a number of football sources in the UK that show that whistles appeared on the football field in 1875, and it was created by chance. It is said that the referee of one game was a policeman, because the spectators crowded into the stadium to make the order disorderly, the game could not be carried out, the police referee had an idea, took out the siren and blew it, which actually played a great role, and the order on the field quickly returned to normal.

Since then, referees on the football field have been using whistles to make decisions, and this has soon been extended to other matches.

Normally, the referee will bring two whistles when playing. If the first whistle is broken, the second whistle can be replaced. During a match, the referee usually ties the whistle to the wrist with a short piece of rope for easy blowing, or directly around the fingers.

Whether it is collecting money or because the whistle is too biased in personal feelings, each game will choose not to invite this referee back to blow it when there is a lack of things. It's hard to see a lifetime ban in the true sense of the word, because there are so many sports systems, the level of competition, all kinds of things. On the other hand, there are too few serious and high-level referees.

It may seem ridiculous, but that's what it is. There are so many opportunities for growth, and every excellent referee is formed after eating up a lot of training resources. This kind of cultivation is basically one person and one pit, occupying it, and there is no echelon and reserve force.

Black whistle referee example:

For example, Donaghi, there is such a big thing in the NBA, he is willing to play a lower game, and there will still be some places that are willing to use him because of their own circumstances.

So in fact, at present, the referees of the World Series, aside from the NBA, there is really no so-called effective punishment method, they are all supported by the referee's sense of honor, and the referee is afraid that he will not be able to blow the game instead of losing his job.

For example, the Olympics, 750 US dollars.

One game or three thousand a week, you can't get much money at all, to put it bluntly, it's a lost work fee.

But he is a great honor, so even though the money may not be as much as they usually get to work, many people are still willing to keep their heads shut.

Out of the NBA and a handful of European leagues, blowing games is not their only job, or even their main business. And you can't effectively fine. You can only try to pick the better ones in history, and then eliminate them when something happens.

Do not change the result of the game, post-match punishment, just like the previous Italian ** door and the Chinese Super League this year.

Minor fines or bans for several matches, up to a lifetime ban, but none of them will have an impact on the outcome of the match.

If there is conclusive evidence, the Football Association may change the referee in the middle of the match; If the match is over, a post-match penalty will be given. Either way, the score on the field will not be affected.

Depending on the severity of the circumstances or the amount of money involved, the Football Association may impose a ban on the game, a lifetime ban, revoke all referee qualifications, and file a lawsuit with the court, the procuratorate and other legal institutions.

Final punishment: Leave it to the fans to deal with, the police don't care!