Taoism emphasizes the rule of inaction, is it suitable for the contemporary society to govern the co

Unhappy. The Taoist idea of ruling by doing nothing is a product of ancient feudal society and is very old-fashioned. It has been replaced by a new ideology and culture.

It is not suitable for the contemporary society to govern the country and the family, this view lacks a spirit of forging ahead, and always believes that it is not to seek merit, but to seek no fault, and is afraid of taking risks, which is not beneficial to the development of society.

It is not suitable, because only by doing something can the country and society develop benignly.

There are some similarities between the "politics of non-action" in China and the "rule by non-action" of Taoism, but in fact the two are not identical.

The "politics of non-action" in rural China refers to the fact that political power is not explicitly exercised in a particular social structure, but is governed through the customs, traditions, and morals of its members. This political model is characterized by its dependence on the natural functioning of social structures and social forces, with a relatively small role for political power. This is similar to the Taoist idea of "rule by doing nothing", which emphasizes going with the flow, not interfering too much, and letting things develop naturally.

However, Taoism's "rule by doing nothing" is a comprehensive philosophical thought, emphasizing "doing nothing without doing nothing", that is, not deliberately pursuing utilitarianism and purpose, but achieving governance through the pure and envious way of nature. Taoists believe that only through the way of "non-action" can the true "governance" be achieved. Therefore, in Taoist thought, "wu wei" is the unity of means and ends, and is a comprehensive philosophical concept.

In contrast, the "politics of non-action" in rural China pays more attention to the role of social structure and social forces, and the role of political power is relatively small. This political model may encounter some problems in practice, such as the fact that members of society may have contradictions and conflicts due to differences in customs, traditions, and morals. Therefore, the "politics of non-action" in rural China emphasizes the appropriate intervention and guidance of political power in a specific social structure and cultural background.

To sum up, there are similarities between the "politics of non-action" in rural China and the "rule of non-action" in Taoism, but in fact the two are not exactly the same. Rural China's "noisy and inaction politics" pays more attention to the role of social structures and social forces, while Taoism's "rule by non-action" is a comprehensive philosophical thought.

First of all, Taoism does not have the idea of governing by doing nothing, Taoism always stresses prudence to the end, success does not live, and never fixes what is done, but the purpose is very strong, and the bow is open.

Hold the arrow and constantly make corrections, so as to achieve the rule of righteousness. Therefore, looking at the various policies and methods during the reign of the Taoists, it is Taoist thought.

The embodiment of the so-called rule of inaction, not a simple recuperation. It is not the Taoist rule of non-action as explained by Confucianism, and all the current versions of the rule of non-action are the version of Confucianism that puts forward the Confucian interpretation, which is a thorough Confucianism.

The rule of inaction is the first concept first put forward by Confucianism, and the specific explanation of Confucianism is a cheesy point, which is a kind of rhetoric of Confucianism with the direction of the wind, and an auspicious means to induce people to mistakenly recognize Taoist thought, which is directly said to smear or smear some dyes of Confucianism, resulting in the continuous distortion of Taoist doctrine.