Is it more effective to use Buddhist theories to solve psychological problems?

Buddhist theory is fundamentally "directed at the human heart", and this is the reason why Zen Buddhism has always been popular. Because Buddhism says that "all idealism" and "ten thousand laws are idealistic", all human problems are caused by the human mind.

The Buddha said that the Buddhist scriptures are often based on metaphors, there is no real meaning, all words, are not real meanings, are representations, words will never be true, the true essence is ever-changing, there is no fixed phase, there is no interruption, the cycle is repeated, the flow is endless, if it is infinite, so it is separated from the text, not the number of shapes, not the definition, not bound by the law.

True Buddha cultivators do not worship the Buddha, they all know that the mind is the Buddha, the essence is the Buddha, there is no form, there is no restraint, because of the attachment to the form, so the restraint, if the delusion is exhausted, there is no solution, there is no restraint, the centrifugal consciousness is the true cultivation of the Buddha, not focused on worship, not in the form, not delusional, cut off the promising, away from the delusion, the realization of the mind itself, no gain and no loss, the same nature.

There is no dwelling in all things, there is no one to stay, who is the binding? Who is the slaughtered?

The ontology of space, called Buddha-nature, called Tai Chi, called Truthfulness, True-Heartedness, Spatial Essence, Mind-Consciousness, Mind-Mind, Mind-Mind, Thought-Delusion, Affliction, Delusion, Evil Opinion, Non-Self-Seeing, External Vision, Life and Death Vision, Lost in the Mind, and Taking Delusion.

The realm of psychology is not as good as the skin of a Buddha, psychology is the movement of the mind, and the Buddha is the nature of realizing the absolute truth of the essence of the mind and cultivating perfection and attaining absolute liberation and supernatural powers, transcending people and me, beyond life and death, and beyond the mind.

Buddhism is not psychology.

The first point is that psychology, which falls under the umbrella of the social sciences, is based on experience and statistics. Buddhism is purely "experience". Is there a way to falsify it, so it's unscientific.

Note that this is unscientific, not pseudoscience. Pseudoscience, which belongs to the first field of complete ignorance, is the field of science that is currently recognized by mainstream Chinese society for the purpose of seeking external identification or deception.

There is a faith in your heart, which is also your spiritual pillar. In fact, it is to use Buddhism to ** psychological patients, and many fields, including Chinese medicine, are affected by this kind of **. Psychology is carried out within the framework of scientific arguments.

At present, the mainstream society generally agrees with the description of human psychological activity in the highest atmosphere. Therefore, the sentence itself is false. Of course, we can throw away the words and we can see what the sentence is really trying to express.

I believe that most people are interested in psychology because it is the "orthodox" way of "understanding intentions". That said, most people who are interested in psychology are not interested in statistics or academic research.

If the problem is to be expressed in this sense, it is the most thorough understanding of one's own ways and those of others. Why? I guess I can't say that.

All the thoughts are in Buddhism, and you are going to "experience". According to my personal understanding, the essence of Buddhism is purity. Whatever you want to be pure, Buddhism can do it for you.

That's why some people in the upper echelons like Buddhism.