Philosophy What is the argument for the existence or non existence of the dead soul

The main illustration of the existence of the soul lies in the fact that Descartes once said, "If you can imagine that one thing separates into two things, then it must be separated into two things." No one has been able to cite a counter-example to this statement, and certainly no one has been able to prove it true. So the core of the existence of the soul is really an idealist question, and when you become aware of that kind of thing, then from that point on, it exists.

In fact, no matter how you analyze or prove it, idealism and materialism are actually relatively perfect logical systems, but they cannot accommodate each other. Although materialism can be confirmed in many practical aspects, it cannot deny the rationality of idealistic logic.

If one of the logical systems cannot be shown to be problematic, then it is necessary to admit that both are possible.

Whatever you use as evidence, it's just that you think it's evidence, and it's just called logical evidence! It's exactly the same whether a dead soul exists or not, whether it exists or not, it's just that you think with your brain or your mind. If you don't think about it, you won't have questions like this!

Now that the questions are gone, there is no need to look for answers! So, the argument is, you're just wishful thinking! Detached from the mental level, all other arguments are lies within lies!

Death couldn't be simpler. Everything in the universe is everywhere, and even if the sun shines on the earth for hundreds of millions of years, today's sun is by no means yesterday's sun. Today's Earth is not yesterday's Earth. In the same way, what I am today is not who I was yesterday.

Death is that everything is made up of molecules, and when you die, you become molecules and merge into something else, and you can see Sophie's world for the answer.

Philosophically, the death of an individual does not represent the end of things. The DAO instance died, but within it was his legacy

Problems, relationships, and so on have not disappeared, but have been inherited or carved up. In religion there is a saying of reincarnation, but in fact in philosophy, this "reincarnation" is certain. In convergent evolution, it is inevitable that similar environments will produce similar-looking organisms.

People are the same, similar environments, similar education, similar experiences, it is likely that two similar lives will occur.

It is from the perspective of modern Western compound science to treat life and death, that is, the loss of life function.

People cannot live forever, they will die, it is an objective change, it does not transfer with the will of people, and it embodies the principle of materialism; Death is a natural law, and life and death are a pair of contradictions, which run through the principle of materialist dialectics.

Death is a change, a change and movement of internal structure.

Philosophy holds that death is a liberation, an objective law.

There is no death just in different ways, one in reality and one in the virtual world.

Western philosophy has come to the conclusion that existence is the final event. This means that death and existence can be equated.

I sometimes laugh at why Western philosophers have to"Overflow"What is the meaning of death?

In contrast, Chinese philosophers are much wiser and more open-minded. For example, Confucius, when a student asked him what was going on with death, he replied: I don't know anything about life, but I know about death there.

Yes, people should spend energy on managing their own lives, building and creating. As for death, leave it to God's care. To be born is to participate in existence, and to die is to withdraw from existence.

Life is for all, and death is for individuals. You have the right to choose death, but you don't have the right to choose rebirth, and if you don't choose death, you can choose eternal life, like Lao Tzu Buddha ......Or Einstein Freud ......Or yourself!

Heidegger said that only death is truly one's own.

However, death may be nothing to oneself.

When you die, the world is gone.

Death cannot take away the meaning of death itself.

The meaning of death remains in the world, in all the people and things associated with the deceased, and your loved ones will feel pain for your death.

Everything you had in life becomes a relic.

The dead are gone, and the meaning of death is still wandering around the world, like a ghost or a ghost, it evolves itself into all kinds of deaths.

It can be the death of a hero as heavy as Mount Tai.

It can be a senseless death as light as a feather.

And then the meaning of death goes back to your life, and the babbling of your childhood, which can be the chirp of genius, or an injury from childhood, is given the meaning of the factor that determines him to become a murderer, in the sense that death prescribes life, nothingness determines existence, and we are born to die.

We often say that "some people are dead, but they are still alive", which means that great people have made important contributions to the world, and their spirit lives on. Or let's talk about a person who is seriously ill and can't save the oak in time, so he dies and so ......onThere are many ways we can imagine what "death" is, but have we ever thought about what death means? I don't know if you have had a few nights in the world, idle and fine, and you will also think about what kind of status you have in the vast universe?

Or, for example, what will happen to the world when I'm gone? Such a question. But in any case, as soon as we start thinking like this, we fall into the pit, and we fall into the heaviest philosophical reflection, the question of death.

This ultimate human care.

As soon as a person is born, the death case has been filed, and the whole life is nothing more than a suspended execution of the death penalty. But if we only understand it in this way, we don't need to worry about it, because if we only understand people as a process of beginning and end, then we just need to passively accept the process. But it is inconceivable that he would ask himself:

Why am I here? Squirrels will eat pine cones, big fish will eat small fish, but they never ask, why do we eat them? Once one asks why, death is not just about "death" in the biological sense, but about the generation and depression of human meaning.

Death is a complex and diverse issue, not only involving the fields of biodestructural, medicine, psychology, etc., but also an important issue in philosophy. As a philosophical question, the meaning and value behind death can push us to think about and understand the nature of life and the meaning of human existence. Here are some philosophical questions about death:

1.What is the nature of death? Is it the decay of the body, the demise of the mind, or the disappearance of the perception of the self?

2.Does death mean eternal unconsciousness and non-existence?

3.Does death mean that the meaning of our lives has been denied?

4.Does death have to do with the concepts of ultimate truth, liberation, and transcendence?

5.What impact does death have on our outlook on life and values?

These questions can make people think more deeply about their own lives and the value of human existence, as well as the changes that death brings to our outlook on life and values. Therefore, death as a philosophical question is indeed necessary.

Which of the following philosophers believes that death is the most intrinsic thing of man's ascension to the world. Chuichang () AFeuerbach.

b.Heidegger.

c.The state returned to Binoza.

d.Sartre. Correct answer: c