Spending money to find someone to do something, but it doesn t get done, can the money be returned?

This situation through the normal way is basically not coming back.

The receipt is the original voucher used by enterprises and institutions in economic activities, mainly referring to the receipt and payment voucher printed by the financial department stamped with the seal of the financial bill supervision, which is used for administrative income, that is, non-taxable business!

Type description: Internal receipts are self-made vouchers within the unit, which are used for business within the unit, such as internal allocation of materials, collection of employee deposits, refund of excess business trip loans, etc. In this case, the internal self-made receipt is a legitimate document that can be recorded as a cost expense.

If there is business between units, and the payee does not need to pay taxes after receiving the payment, the payee can issue a receipt supervised by the tax department.

Administrative fees incurred by administrative institutions may use receipts supervised by the financial department.

If there is a business transaction between a unit and a unit and there is no need to pay taxes in accordance with regulations, a receipt produced by the unit can be used, and this kind of receipt is also a legal voucher and can be recorded in the accounts.

In addition to the above-mentioned receipts, other self-made receipts used by units or individuals when receiving and paying are what they call it on a daily basis"White stripes", which cannot be recorded as a voucher.

How can you find an intermediary to do this kind of thing?!

It's definitely no longer a play now. Or come back, you don't have any credentials. Even if you file a lawsuit, you can't do it.

Count, but the crux of the matter is that you don't have evidence.

No, basically I won't come back, my mother didn't find someone to do things before, but the money was also lost, begging.

It depends on what the middleman thinks.

Legal Analysis: 1. Negotiation.

If the money is not refunded if the work is not completed, the party concerned should first negotiate with the other party on the return of the arrears. If acceptable to the parties, the amount of the return may be appropriately reduced. If you can't accept it and the other party refuses to return it, you can ask for it back through legal means.

2. Prosecution. If the money is not refunded if the work is not completed, the parties may file a lawsuit with the court in accordance with unjust enrichment or entrustment contract disputes. Under normal circumstances, it is illegal to find someone to do things in violation of the relevant provisions of the law, and the entrusted matter can be determined to be invalid through a lawsuit, and the other party can be ordered to return the relevant money.

Raids. Legal basis: Article 58 of the General Principles of the Civil Law The following civil acts are invalid:

violating the law or the public interest;

An invalid civil act is not legally binding from the beginning of the act.

Article 61: After a civil act is confirmed to be invalid or revoked, property acquired by a party as a result of that act shall be returned to the party that suffered losses. The party at fault shall compensate the other party for the losses suffered thereby, and if the other party is at fault, they shall each bear corresponding responsibility.

3. Sue the other party for fraud.

The crime of fraud refers to the act of defrauding a relatively large amount of public or private property by fabricating facts or concealing the truth for the purpose of illegal possession.

If the other party is involved in the above acts, the party can directly report to the police and sue the other party for fraud. If it is determined that there is no fraud and it is not accepted, you can file a lawsuit with the court.

Legal basis: Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China

Article 266:Where public or private property is defrauded and the amount is relatively large, a sentence of up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention or controlled release is to be given, and/or a single fine is given where the amount is huge or there are other serious circumstances, a sentence of between three and ten years imprisonment is to be given, and where the amount of the fine is especially huge or there are other especially serious circumstances, a sentence of 10 or more years imprisonment or life imprisonment is to be given, and a concurrent fine or confiscation of property. Where this Law provides otherwise, follow those provisions.

Article 192:Where fraudulent methods are used to illegally raise funds for the purpose of illegal possession, and the amount is relatively large, a sentence of between three and seven years imprisonment is to be given, and where the amount is huge or there are other serious circumstances, a sentence of seven or more years imprisonment or life imprisonment is to be given, and a concurrent fine or confiscation of property.

Where a unit commits the crime in the preceding paragraph, the unit is to be fined, and the directly responsible managers and other directly responsible personnel are to be punished in accordance with the provisions of the preceding paragraph.

Article 266:Where public or private property is defrauded and the amount is relatively large, a sentence of up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention or controlled release is to be given, and/or a fine; where the amount is huge or there are other serious circumstances, a sentence of between 3 and 10 years imprisonment and a concurrent fine is to be given; where the amount is especially huge or there are other especially serious circumstances, a sentence of 10 or more years imprisonment or indefinite imprisonment is to be given, and a concurrent fine or confiscation of property. Where this Law provides otherwise, follow those provisions.

Legal analysis: Spending money to entrust people to do things, but now the things are not done, it is not necessarily the crime of fraud, it depends on what happened;

1. The crime of fraud refers to the use of fictitious facts or methods to conceal the truth for the purpose of illegal possession to defraud a relatively large amount of public or private property. 1. Whoever commits this crime shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, short-term detention or controlled release, and/or a fine; 2. Where the amount is huge or there are other serious circumstances, a sentence of between 3 and 10 years imprisonment and a concurrent fine is to be given; 3. Where the amount is especially huge or there are other especially serious circumstances, a sentence of 10 or more years imprisonment or life imprisonment is to be given, and a concurrent fine or confiscation of property is to be given.

II. The "Supreme People's Court and Supreme People's Procuratorate Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Specific Application of Law in Handling Criminal Cases of Fraud" (effective April 8, 2011) provides: Where public or private property is defrauded with a value of 3,000 to 10,000 RMB, 30,000 to 100,000 RMB, or 500,000 RMB, it shall be respectively found to be a "relatively large amount", "huge amount", or "especially huge amount" as provided for in article 266 of the Criminal Law.

Legal basis: Article 266 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China: Severe punishment as appropriate:

1) Committing fraud against an unspecified number of people by sending text messages and making phone calls**, or using the internet, radio and television, newspapers and magazines, and so forth to publish false information;

2) Defrauding and defrauding people of funds and materials for disaster relief, emergency rescue, flood control, preferential care, poverty alleviation, immigration, relief, or medical treatment;

3) Committing fraud in the name of disaster relief fundraising;

4) Defrauding the property of persons with disabilities, the elderly, or persons who have lost the ability to work;

5) Causing the victim to commit suicide, become mentally disturbed, or have other serious consequences.

Summary. Spending money to find someone to do something is not done, and the money can be returned, because there is an agreement between you, and if the other party does not fulfill this agreement to help you complete this thing, then the money should also be returned.

Spending money to find someone to do something, but it doesn't get done, can the money be returned?

The money can be returned, because there is an agreement between you, and if the other party does not fulfill this agreement to help you complete the state preparations, then the money should also be returned.

When someone asks me to do something, first give me 5,000 yuan, and then it's a fight, can I not return the money?

No, you cannot. He has now sent a lawyer's letter.

Well, the lawyer's letter can help you take a look.

I didn't fight him, will the court file a case in this case.

Yes. First of all, it is illegal to fight, and it is correct not to help him fight, but this money belongs to unjust enrichment, of course, it should also be returned by Wang of the Imperial Palace.

Well, it's a lawyer's letter.

It's been five years.

Five years is still statute of limitations.

Still have any questions.

If you need it, you can click on the package case consultation.

There is no limit for 24 hours, and the number of times is more detailed.

Summary. It should be returned, dear.

Spending money to find someone to do something, but the thing is not done, can the money be returned?

The other party said that it could not be refunded, and there was a transfer record.

It should be returned, dear.

Article 153 of the Jianliang Civil Code of the People's Republic of China stipulates that: "Civil juristic acts that violate the mandatory provisions of laws and administrative regulations are invalid. Civil juristic acts that violate public order and good customs are invalid.

Article 157 stipulates: "After a civil juristic act is invalid, revoked, or determined not to take effect, the property acquired by the actor as a result of the act shall be returned. ”

It is advisable to negotiate the return, pro.

Just talking about returning, it is what to do, can you report the case fraud?

Why don't you speak.

Where is it? Kiss. You can report the crime if you have a record of the transfer.

Will the police station file a case?

1. The crime of fraud refers to the act of defrauding a relatively large amount of public or private property by fabricating facts or concealing the truth for the purpose of illegal possession. 2. If you fabricate the truth or conceal the truth and collect money and do not return it, it is a crime of fraud. If there is no fabrication of facts or concealment of the truth, it is a civil dispute and does not constitute a crime.

How much does it cost? Kiss.

Ten thousand. So much. Is there any other evidence?

Chat logs these.

He said that the leadership is very good, and the Education Bureau is also very good, and he is responsible for taking the child to recruit the teacher, and he will not take the money back.

This nature is more bad, dear.

There is no chat history.

If you have chat records and transfer records, you can call the police, dear.

Hello, if the problem has been solved, you can click on the upper right corner of the "end service", thank you, please give the file Kaizan. You can also click on the avatar to follow me, if you have any other questions, please feel free to ask me again.

Summary. Hello dear, happy to serve you1In the case of an unjust enrichment lawsuit, the trustee may sue the court to demand a refund of the money.

2.Sue for a dispute over the entrustment contract, and the request is not completed, and the lawsuit is brought to the court to demand that the other party return it. 3.

If the other party fabricates an identity and interpersonal relationship and defrauds the solicitation fee, the other party may constitute the crime of fraud, and the trustee may report the case to the public security organ, investigate the criminal responsibility of the other party, and demand that the other party make restitution. Hope mine helps you! Have a great day.

Hello dear, happy to serve you1In the case of an unjust enrichment lawsuit, the trustee may sue the court to demand a refund of the money. 2.

In order to entrust the joint reform and the same dispute to sue the lawsuit, please trust the matter to fail and not complete, and sue the court to claim the other party's return. 3.If the other party fabricates an identity and interpersonal relationship and defrauds the solicitation fee, the other party may constitute the crime of fraud, and the trustee may report the case to the public security organ, investigate the criminal responsibility of the other party, and demand that the other party make restitution.

Hope mine helps you! I wish you a happy life.

Does it mean that if he doesn't return it to me, I will go directly to the court to sue.

It is possible to sue, but it depends on whether there is a contractual treaty.

No, there are only chat logs and recordings, but also transfer records.

That's enough.