9 Korean Grammar Urgent, Korean grammar problems

After reading the answers of several others, they all have some questions. It seems that people don't know much about this syntax. There is also a third floor that is not right for the fourth question.

1.It means "what to do for what". For example: Study hard to get good grades. ）

2.Indicates a state or action that has continued from the past to the present. For example:

He said that he has been learning Korean from the past to the present. ) indicates an action or state that continues from now to the future. For example:

It means that things are going smoothly and going on. ）

3.It means "you can't do anything". For example: Smoking is not allowed in public places. ）

4.This statement is false. It can be changed to Eaten. That's the general way of putting it. That's right, but it's emphasized. It means that you have eaten "food" and not something else.

I don't understand what to ask in the first three questions.

Fourth sentence. The previous one is wrong, there is no such statement, it is correct.

If it's an interrogative sentence, it means, "Have you eaten?" >

If not, that is, "The Rice is Eaten".

The first sentence is what it means for what.

The second sentence is about what (because of what).

The third sentence is what if, then it is (if it is, not how) and the fourth sentence should be

Meaning, have you eaten it? Or, eat.

Put it at the end of the sentence or after the body word, and use these to go.

For what, what to do.

For example: In order to learn Korean Chinese, go to Seoul National University. 한국

Why came [why went].

If anything, it will become.

For example, if you want to go to Korea, you must first learn Korean Chinese. 한국

Both"I've eaten"The former is not emphasized, while the latter is emphasized.

Or I'll do it, it was supposed to be written directly but given the problem of legatos, it is customary to write directly as written as That's the reason. It means that imperative quotation is to paraphrase someone else's words, and here there is no grammatical meaning, just connecting syllables, and it cannot be added after it, so it is written directly

Here it means the future. It is written only when the article is added, and this is for the future.

Level.

Yours is not right. See my explanation.

The verbs adjectives + and .,The meaning is the same: very, very).

noun+

Generally followed by negation, indicating that it is not general.

v indicates a deep degree. Very ......, especially ......, no small ......, not ordinary.

Example: This exam is very difficult.

She is very beautiful.

It is especially cold in winter.

This man is very handsome.

Quite simply, it's right to stay the same"It would have been"하지 ", like, "Just.""말아"There is no other word to follow, so it is customary to mark it according to the citation"하지 "。

Invariant is correct, after the part of the predicate that ends in the stem, and ", when the receiver "" falls off, it does not involve, so it does not change;

As for the special vocabulary that exists in life, it can be regarded as a fixed sentence and a correct expression.

Here's their basic usage:

Generally" " The word in front of it does not have a falling sound, or it is preceded by a noun example: did), is a), is a mountain).

Generally" "The word in front of it has a falling sound, or it is preceded by an example of a verb: eaten), worn), died).

"Yes" and "What does this mean???

Absolutely not. It is the semantics that denote the past.

For example: discussed, discussed.

fyi ~~

When there is a consonant, it is ''

When there are no consonants, it's

Hope it helps.

Why do grammar people here take the way to learn Chinese and study foreign languages?

If it's the same as Chinese, is it still called a foreign language?

1.Is it the article form ending, which is preceded by verbs and adjectives?

There are verbs and adjectives! Let me give you an example

The verb is followed by the adjective-( and

2.These are adopted -( because they are all supposed to be the past tense of the verb? Can it be understood in this way?

Wrong is to see if there is a tail in front of it No tail note There is a tail note -(

3.(and - (can be counted as a future tense?)

Neither can denote the future tense ( Denote something or something can be in the present tense and past tense.

) is in the past tense to mean to see what's going on, like "I'm dying of exhaustion" and so on.

) and - (are syntax.

4.The preceded by -( should all indicate the future tense except for the grammar (see ( and - (similar grammar).)

5.To sum up.

1.Look at the tail note.

2.Understand grammar.

4 years of studying in Korea have passed.

Question 1 What is considered an ingredient in a sentence?

Answer: Be the subject. Because = is added to the sign of the subject, it is the subject.

Question 2 How to use this syntax.

Answer: It is equivalent to a definite clause in English. Here can be seen as a definite sentence (going to ** dinner tonight) to modify the back.

Question 3: Is it OK?

A: Yes. Because =

is a time adverbial is a place adverbial.

is a verb-object phrase, in"하다"After that, add the form of a predicative sentence"는 게", you can be the subject directly. It translates to "Where are we going to have dinner tonight?" ”

"Yes"것이"Abbreviations.

= is an abbreviation for these two, that is, shorthand, and the usage is the same. So that's true, too.

Yes, it's just an acronym.

The verb + is a negative sentence, don't, don't mean is the meaning of not regretting.

Don't let yourself be too tired, the simple translation is not too tired, is the meaning of let, example sentence: Mom doesn't let you do it.

The verb + is the basic order and the verb+ is the esteem order encountered to fall off.

It is a idiomatic sentence structure, and the main function is to nominalize the verb in front of it, indicating respect, if the other party is not an elder or knows the other party very well, it is okay not to use it.

Example sentence: I wish you all the best.

Negative sentence.

Don't do it. 하지

Please don't do it. 하지

Encounter the one that is going to fall off.

It is a fixed collocation in Chinese, which is "don't." meaning. If you add at the end, you need to change the tone

It is equivalent to turning the previous adjective into an adverb, and the adverb can modify the verb, but the adjective cannot modify the verb.

It is also a fixed collocation in Korean, which is "hope." can be omitted or abbreviated to . And in the sentence is an honorific, which is used after the verb stem...

It has the function of adverbialization, for example, is an adjective, and is an adverb. Here it is used in front of the verb to indicate degree. In Korean, adverbs are generally used in front of verbs.

The literal translation should be not to work too hard, in fact, it means not to be too tired. The exact translation depends on the context.

Honorifics, which are used after a verb or adjective, are not placed in front of a verb, but are nominalized words, similar to . For example, it is a verb to speak, but it becomes a noun.

Here is a grammar, verb + hope... The meaning of , using , is actually to nominalize the previous verb.

The first one, choose 3. South Korea says that whether cosmetics are good or not, using the method of "eating or not eating", it is all prescribed.

Second, choose 3. It's a connecting word that means "to... time", needless to say.

Thirdly, choose 2. It's a particle that means not necessarily. The meaning of this sentence is: "Gifts don't have to be expensive and good, no. ”

According to the light of the hand, as it is].

One. Only. Right away. Immediately] used together more. Please refer to it.

After the end of the definite word, it means "according to, as it is". The body word plus " is formed, and it also shows the same meaning.

As soon as the rain stops, let's go right away