Why are social laws classless?

Why are social laws classless? Why?

It is a set of political multiple-choice questions, and the difference between the laws of nature and the laws of society is: "There are several options, one of which is that the laws of nature have no class character, and the social laws have class nature. The correct answer is to judge this as wrong, saying that the laws of nature and society are objective and not subject to human will.

But I have always wondered why the laws of society are not class-oriented.

Class: If a thing reflects the special interests and requirements of a certain class, this thing has a class character;

Social law: refers to the inevitable direction of social development and the driving force to promote the development and progress of society;

At least Marxists think:

The direction and mode of development of society are not subject to the will of certain people, a certain class, or even all mankind.

Just like the laws of nature, people can understand and use the laws of society, but they cannot go beyond the laws of society; It is even less possible for the laws of society to reflect the interests and demands of a certain class.

Social laws are the basic laws of social movements. Social movements are above class, from the primitive society without classes to the class society to the new society without classes in the future, and social movements are always under the domination of social laws. Regardless of whether there are classes in society or not, social laws always play a role, so social laws have no class character.

However, although the most fundamental social law, "the relations of production must be adapted to the productive forces," does not have a class character, it has different concrete manifestations in different societies and different class societies.

The proposition is wrong, and the social law is of course class-based, and since there is a human society, all people's cognition and activities have been branded with class. I hope you change the proposition and then help you elaborate.

Social laws are the basic laws of social movements. It does not change by human will.

Primitive societies also had no classes.

The reason for the emergence of classes is because people have different qualities and intelligences. As long as people's quality, intelligence, ideology, and concepts are different, classes will arise. In fact, the fundamental reason for the inequality of status and income is that people's minds are different from what they think.

On the other hand, what you think, your level of intelligence, is due to genetic and environmental factors.

Genetic factors, we can't control it, we can't control it, we don't care. But we can control the environment we live in, that is to say, we have to find ways to make our environment high, that is, the children you grow up in an excellent environment, you are also an excellent person, and the children you grow up in a poor place are basically poor.

The poverty mentioned here is your idea of the world's chaotic rent, and your quality is poor. You don't think of your ideas as poor now, just because you're still trapped in your own mind and don't see the outside world.

The frog at the bottom of the well will think that one of its own wells is its own world.

The laws of nature and social law are objective and not subject to human will.

Class: If a thing reflects the special interests and requirements of a certain class, this thing has a class character;

Social law: refers to the inevitable direction of social development and the driving force to promote the development and progress of society;

There is also no class character in the laws of society.

Hello social relations, head office relations, class relations, determining meaning, social relations.

CDC The laws of nature exist in the natural world, and the social laws only appear after the development of the natural world to a certain stage and the emergence of human society, and it exists in the practical activities of human beings.

The law of society is class-based.

The so-called social law refers to the inevitable direction of social development and the driving force for social development and progress. Humanistic philosophy believes that human needs are the original driving force to promote the development and progress of society and determine the direction of social development and progress, and human knowledge is the direct driving force to promote the development and progress of society.

The process of social development is as follows: under the influence of language and writing, each person can acquire the knowledge of others and his ancestors, and then on the basis of the knowledge of others and his ancestors, he responds to and understands external things according to his own needs, and passes on the knowledge he has gained from his own knowledge to others and future generations.

I think it's objective and class-based.