Zoo debate contest argument essay, what are the benefits of establishing a zoo ah urgent debate cont

Huang Xiaoxuan, Class 6 (1) of Gongming Street Central Primary School, Bao'an District, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province One day, monkeys, snails, and rabbits were arguing about related matters. The elephant passed by, so they asked the elephant to judge who was justified.

Here's what happened: the snail was practicing calligraphy stroke by stroke, and the little monkey was riding from a distance. After a while, I heard a cry, and it turned out that the little monkey had knocked the snail down.

The snail complained: "You have messed up the words I have worked so hard to practice, you will pay, you will pay ......."The little monkey thought about it, and suddenly had an idea, and said: "We have now stepped into a new era, I have a computer at home, you don't have to practice writing, just type on the computer!"

The snail thought for a moment and said, "No, I think writing is more meaningful. And the little monkey said:

We've stepped into a new era, so be stylish. The snail retorted: "Writing is the main feature of our China.

And so they have been debating.

After two minutes, the Rabbit, the king of the Silly Wheel, came to the forest, and when he saw the two arguing, he inserted himself into their ranks. Its. Of course, the point is to practice more words.

It says, "If we don't practice writing, we don't have much learning." When the little monkey heard this, he was very unconvinced, and when he saw the elephant coming, he wanted to ask it for comment.

When the elephants heard this, they felt that they all had a point. So, it racked its brains: "Oh, there it is! It said, "Tell me what you know from your point of view." ”

The little monkey rushed to say: "Computers can make it more convenient for us, and we can shop online." ”

The snail said, "Writing keeps you from being lazy." The rabbit continued, "And it can make us appreciate Chinese characters better." ”

When the elephant heard this, he said, "You all have their own points of view, and if you say it is convenient, you have to count the computer; But when it comes to appreciation, you should count the words.

The rabbit suddenly popped up and said, "That means you have to learn both." The little monkey snail nodded.

1.It allows people to go without having to travel long distances and risk danger, so that they can go to see some strange and ferocious animals.

2.By concentrating all kinds of animals on a relatively small scale, people can see them in their entirety, rather than going to the habitat of each animal.

3.In fact, the animal circle also provides a kind of shelter for animals, and when they lose their original habitat, the zoo is the best place for them to return.

5.For children, it is the best to get rid of only watching some flat things on TV, and truly feel the charm of animals.

6.Increase the local economic income and create local characteristics (animal circles can be built into a living state that is as close to the wildlife world as possible, Shanghai Zoo, Qingdao Aquarium Tube, are good examples).

7.Some laid-off workers can be provided with conditions and opportunities for reemployment.

8.To promote the development of local tourism, we can also increase foreign exchange earnings and do a good job in the industrialization of the tertiary economy.

9.Driven by the promotion of other local economic development, the daily demand for a large number of animals for food, to promote the development of the food, vegetable, meat industry to the greatest extent.

At the same time, you will also face the reasons and views of the opposing side, and I will list a few points:

1.How sad it is to imprison the activities of animals, so that they gradually lose their own nature and nature.

2.People just want to satisfy their own desires, they are captured, let their wives separate, and spend their old age crying and lonely in the zoo.

3.They only use the zoo as a means to make money and do not really care about the feelings of the animals.

4.Zoos are a kind of proper resettlement after people gradually encroach on and occupy the environment on which they live, just like the nature of immigration.

5.To a certain extent, the animals in the animal circle present children with an illusion that the real tiger or lion does not eat meat like that, but eats those strong wildebeest or something, which is very fierce. Go on.

Large zoos can protect the activity venues of wild animals, some small zoos put tigers, lions, leopards, bears and other wild animals in cages, the activity venues are small, feeding is not scientific, just to make money, this kind of zoo country should be banned without ability and qualifications!

The harm outweighs the good, not the killing of death.

The main disadvantage is human interference. Arguments that can evolve:

Freedom The survival of animals has lost their freedom because of human selfishness, and no human being wants to be the one to be held in a cage and watched, even if human beings themselves are animals.

Exterminating spirituality Every creature has its own way of living, and it is in itself against nature for humans to turn them into "pets" by raising them.

Wrong feelings" When humans visit zoos, they sometimes make a lot of actions from a human perspective, and because they can't communicate, they don't know if animals will be hurt. This is as barbaric as human colonization.

The main argument is the disadvantage of human interference.

If you want to win, you have to make the most of the pitiful situation of zoo animals. When the compassion of the audience is awakened, that is when you win. Never blame humanity, and as a human being, you don't want others to blame you. Therefore, the side grievances are the weapon to win.

Pure hand-played.

The physical and mental health of the animals and the natural environment in which the animals live can be considered and the establishment of nature reserves can be used as proof.

Essentially, this is a false proposition.

This is the same meaning as the "land for themselves" reserved for the Indians when European immigrants invaded the Americas.

First of all, humans have forced the animals to live, and then, set up a zoo so that they can survive without freedom and living space, and at the same time become human playthings, and dare to discuss here whether the benefits outweigh the disadvantages or the disadvantages outweigh the advantages!! This is a human shame!

Only by making the earth suitable for the survival of animals again, and turning the whole earth into a "zoo", can the benefits outweigh the disadvantages for the animals.

1. If there are fewer animals in the real big forest, there will be fewer green spaces.

2. Wild animals lose their nature.

3. It destroys the ecological balance and destroys the biological chain.

4. The reproduction of animals in zoos will decline, and the number of animals will become smaller and smaller, or even extinct.

5. The cost is high and occupies the site.