Are there magnetic monopoles in the world? Why does magnetism have no magnetic monopole

Theoretically, there can be, but nature has not yet discovered it. Molecular currents can be thought of as magnetic dipoles, and they correspond only to the properties of polarized charges (pairs). In addition, Dirac had shown that the product of a magnetic monopole and charge was a constant, and Jasckson's book of classical electrodynamics gave the assumption that if each charged particle had a magnetic monopole with a constant proportion to the charge, then Maxwell's equations could still return to the form without magnetic monopoles by means of coordinate transformations.

So if the electromagnetic ratio ratio is a constant, then having and not being is the same thing.

Personally, I think that it is possible for a magnetic monopole to exist.

Just like scientists discovered antimatter, there are countless things in this universe that we don't know!!

Yes. It has been confirmed.

However, there are very few in the universe.

One of the mistakes of the cosmic model is that the number of magnetic monopoles predicted is too different from that in the real universe.

The magnetism of matter is fundamentally caused by the rotation of electrons, and there is no other possibility, whereas the rotation of electrons produces two poles at the same time, so there can be no magnetic monopoles.

There should be!! It cannot be said that our vivid knowledge has not reached that level and we have not said that there is none.

This is just a hypothesis of theoretical physicists, and it is difficult to say whether it is consistent with the facts and needs to be confirmed.

I remembered that there was a proof question in the textbook at that time, asking you to push some formulas, imitating a single electron in the form, and the book said that you were looking for but you haven't found a magnetic monopole yet. Are you looking for it useful?

Scientists are working on this thing.

Hello <>

Magnetic monopoles do not have magnetic monopoles because they require positive and negative charges to interact with each other for the generation of a magnetic field, while magnetic monopoles refer to the situation where only a single magnetic charge exists. So physicists have been trying to find the magnetic monopole, but so far they have not found it. This is one of the long-standing problems in physics.

The magnetic field is generated by a moving charge, forming a ring-shaped magnetic field around the moving charge. According to Ampere's law, if a closed loop is passed through this magnetic field, it will experience a force, which is how electromagnets work. Since the electric charge is equal to positive and negative, there must be both positive and negative currents that generate the magnetic field.

Although there is no real ascending magnetic monopole, there is a structure called a magnetic domain, which resembles a tiny magnet in which all the magnetic moments point in the same direction. All the magnetic domains in the entire material interact to form the overall magnetic field. This is also the reason why the north and south poles on magnets always appear in pairs.

It is only the discovery of "quasiparticles" similar to magnetic monopoles, not real magnetic monopoles that "can rewrite textbooks".

If you read carefully about the "discovery of magnetic monoplanes" in various news reports, you can easily find that those are all condensed matter physics news. They simply see a "quasiparticle" in condensed matter that is similar in nature to a magnetic monostage"。

At present, no magnetic single-stage sub-is found in free space.

Real magnetic monospheres in free space and quasiparticles similar to magnetic monoplanes in condensed matter"The difference can be roughly but figuratively analogous to the difference between positrons (real particles) and positively charged holes (quasiparticles) in semiconductor materials.

At present, people (especially those who pay attention to elementary particle physics) talk about the search for magnetic monoplanes in order to eventually find the real magnetic monoplanes, so it is not possible to say whether magnetic monopoles "real" exist.

No single pole has been found.

First of all, we need to modify your question to: What is a basic magnetic sock resistant monopole.

Why can't we find them today?

Elementary magnetic monopole The basic magnetic monopole is similar to an electron (or positron, but instead of the electron producing a negative electric field in all directions, the fundamental magnetic monopole will be a north pole (or south pole) with a magnetic field emitted from a single point.

According to existing physical theories and established mathematical models.

There is no reason why the fundamental magnetic monopole should not exist. Finding a basic fundamental magnetic monopole would be a huge confirmation of the current model and mathematical correctness. But deep down, physicists know that there is a major problem with their current models and understanding of physics.

The energy hierarchy theory will eventually replace string theory.

Be the best candidate for the theory of everything. In the mathematical model of the energy hierarchy theory, a fundamental fundamental magnetic monopole cannot exist. Of course, not being able to find a basic magnetic monopole does not justify the energy hierarchy theory, but at least the theory should be remembered.

Magnetic monopoles are purely hypothetical - quantum physics.

Target**. A magnet with only one pole, i.e., the North Pole does not have the South Pole and vice versa.

Electric monopoles do exist – with a positive charge.

or negatively charged particles, such as protons or electrons. But the magnet possesses a "magnetic field" from north to south, so it is always a dipole.

It is impossible to produce magnetic monopoles with a bar magnet. If you cut the bar magnet in half, each piece has north and south poles. In addition, any known normal substance cannot produce magnetic monopoles.

Magnetic monopoles are purely hypothetical - quantum physics. A magnet with only one pole, i.e., the North Pole does not have the South Pole and vice versa. Electron stop monopoles do exist – particles with a positive or negative charge, such as protons or electrons.

But the magnet possesses a "magnetic field" from north to south, so it is always a dipole.

It is impossible to produce magnetic monopoles with a bar magnet. If you cut the bar magnet in half, each piece has north and south poles. In addition, any known normal substance cannot produce magnetic monopoles.

There is no evidence of the existence of monopoles. As for why the energy hierarchy theory tells us that a basic fundamental magnetic monopole cannot exist, this is quite complicated, and it advances well to the energy hierarchy theory.

It's so small that it's not visible to the naked eye, so we can't find it.

Because this substance is so small, it is impossible to find it with our naked eyes alone.

Because all matter has two sides, we cannot unilaterally look for what exists alone.

Magnetic monopole is a theoretical physics string theory and high-energy particle physics refers to some only with n pole or s pole single finger blind magnetic pole magnetic matter, their magnetic inductance line distribution is similar to the electric field line distribution of point charge, to be precise, magnetic monopole particle is a kind of 'microscopic' one-pole magnetic flux superconducting energy-efficient particle, the existence of magnetic monopole particles, must be 'superconducting quantization' quantum transition, magnetic pole linearity, 'nanolinear' trace effective particles, particles with a quantum transition' Angular momentum's coherent linear combination exists and can be measured.

The reason why the scientific community is so interested in magnetic monopoles is because of the importance of magnetic monopoles in particle physics and astroparticle science, dark matter particles in dark matter, grand unified theory and superstring theory.

Magnetic unipolar particles, a special energy field that exists in a specific environment. Strictly speaking, it is only a kind of material energy field and the 'source excitation' of the particle pole escape correlation, the magnetic unipolar particle does not have the characteristics of multiple magnetic poles, and at the same time has its unique characteristics, it is the first choice for dark matter particles in dark matter dark energy. The black holes and singularities known in the cosmic environment belong to the macroscopic manifestations of single magnetic poles.

I hope I can help you with your doubts.

It is only the discovery of "quasiparticles" similar to magnetic monopoles, not real magnetic monopoles that "can rewrite textbooks".

Dirac once predicted the "Dirac string", which is an imaginary one-dimensional curve connecting two magnetic monopoles. Morris et al. did detect the existence of strings, but Dirac strings are theoretically unobservable, so there is still a difference between the two. The magnetic monopole obtained by Morris et al. is also not a true particle.

For scientists, the work done by Morris and Fennell is more technical than scientific. The magnetic monopole prophesied by Dirac is still nowhere to be found. For this experiment, "I might object to the researchers saying 'true magnetic monopoles,' because when you say real, that means point particles to me, but this one isn't.

It looks like a monopole on a scale, but fundamentally it's not really a monopole. Kimball Milton, a physicist at the University of Oklahoma in the United States

said in a report by Scientific American.