The second question is, what kind of history does anyone know, and asks two historical questions

Institutional innovation is inevitable within a certain period of time and is the progress of society, and the rise and fall of dynasties depends on a variety of factors, not only the political system but also other aspects.

1.The weather in the south is different from the weather in the north, the south has a lot of water and is wet, and the north is windy and dry, so the houses in the north are wide and thick, and the houses in the south are small and delicate and drain smoothly.

In the vast land of the north, bricks are burned with soil to build brick houses, and in some areas in the south, bamboo is used, which is the local material.

In short, there are differences in climatic reasons, material reasons, cultural reasons, and so on.

2.In the desert, only camels can be used, not canopy boats and horses, because horses will starve to death and boats cannot walk on the desert. Jiangnan can only use boats and not camels and horses, because there are too many small bridges and streams.

The grassland uses horses instead of camels because it is inconvenient. Camels are too slow in the steppe, and canopy boats are simply not good.

The difference between the traditional houses in the north and the south is related to the type of climate and the geographical topography of the place.

Why was the feudal personal dependency weakened during the Ming and Qing dynasties?

This must have something to do with the budding of capitalism and the development of commerce.

In fact, in the Ming Dynasty, a strict hukou system was introduced, which was stricter than today's hukou system, and peasants were guilty of capital crimes if they ran around. The attachment of life relationships is much closer than in the Song Dynasty.

However, due to the development of commerce, especially in the Qing Dynasty, the control of household registration was not as strict as that of the Ming Dynasty, and there was also the reform of the tax system, which was apportioned into the mu and the tax was abolished according to the capitation. Therefore, the feudal personal dependency relationship weakened. (See 360 Q&A).

3.Why is it said that the essence of the monopoly organization of the second industrial revolution is the partial adjustment of capitalist production relations?

During the Second Industrial Revolution, monopolies prevailed, the essence of which was the bourgeoisie that ruled in capitalist society by means of change and the contradiction between the productive forces and the relations of production within capitalism. However, the essential contradiction has not changed, and it remains the contradiction between the socialization of production and the capitalist private appropriation of the means of production. Therefore, the role of the monopoly organization can only be to adjust and change the relations of production, but it is impossible to change the nature of capitalist society.

(See 360 Q&A).

4.The formation of monopoly organizations is actually a partial adjustment of the capitalist relations of production, which is mainly manifested in the following ways.

a.The wealth of society is increasingly concentrated in the hands of the industrial bourgeoisie.

b.The property rights and management rights of a number of enterprises have been combined to form a series of production and sales systems.

c.Control the production of goods,**.

d.Changes in the nature of ownership of the means of production.

Answer B (as found in the History paper).

The downstairs seems to be despising me, well, a high school student, willing to bow down, casually, I don't particularly believe in Marxism, the division of the proletariat and the bourgeoisie according to the amount of property owned by people is itself very superficial, since the peasant class and the landlord class are a pair of mortal enemies, and the peasant class can never overthrow the feudal system, as if because the peasant class will become the landlord class after the success of the revolution, then why will the working class, which is also a sworn enemy, overthrow the bourgeoisie and not become the bourgeoisie?

Seems off-topic... The bourgeoisie has achieved universal suffrage, class contradictions have been eased, and the basic contradictions of capitalist society have been alleviated to a certain extent.

This question examines the position of foreign invaders on China's democratic revolution. From the last sentence of the material, it can be seen that the attitude is "neutral", and then the reference to "both sides of the civil war" can be judged that the material describes the early stage of the Taiping Rebellion, when the invaders adopted a neutral wait-and-see attitude, preparing to reap the benefits.

So the answer: a

In the early days, the Kingdom of Heaven movement was fierce. The great powers do not want to intervene in things that are not in their interest.

The Qing Dynasty felt that it had the strength to solve it.

But in the later stages, the movement was not resolved.

The movement developed to the north, involving the interests of the great powers, plus the Qing Dynasty bought and asked for help.

People want to have things that the Qing Dynasty gave away for nothing, don't want it in vain. That's why I joined in the end. It's the foreign guns.

Hope satisfied.

The answer is A, and I don't know how A is judged!

A: Class sex: "There is nothing nobler and more sacred than His Majesty the Emperor." The Emperor's edict had the force of law, and slaves and subordinate peasants had to obey their masters unconditionally" is evident here.

B: Not protected by law: Slaves and subordinate peasants must obey their masters unconditionally.

d: Justinian retained slavery, the fundamental purpose of which was to consolidate the dominance of the slave owners, and there was no such thing as equality; The idea that all men are created equal was only put forward by Rousseau in The Social Contract.

In Rome at the time, the introduction of the Justinian Civil Law was a step forward that restricted slave owners from interpreting customary law at will, and slaves had to obey the primitive and backward customs of slave owners.

Just because the Code of Justinian does not give slaves legal protection does not deny the principle of legal justice that it embodies. In other words, the code is fair and just within the scope of citizens, but it does not give freedom to slaves, but it is embodied after all. Do I understand when I say that?

That's why D was chosen

Answer: c

I just say that the reason why I chose C is that this regulation in the code explains the relationship between slave owners and hard work in feudal society, as well as the punishment of slaves who break the law——— so it has nothing to do with primitive and backward customs

What the material says is not statute. Slaves and subordinate peasants must unconditionally obey their masters' instructions not to choose aThe emperor's edict had the effect of law, and slaves and subordinate peasants must unconditionally obey their masters and obey the arrangement of fate, and the fugitive slaves and subordinate peasants must be severely punished.

So I don't choose B. The above material can be said to be incorrect, because the nature of ancient Rome was a slave class.

Item b Justinian's Civil Law Encyclopedia marks the final completion of the Roman law system Roman law protects slavery and protects the interests of the slave-owning class Slaves and subordinate peasants are not protected by the lawCorrect item A is the same as item D Equality before the law is for citizens Slaves are not included Item D is misstated.