I want to talk about the good guys and bad guys in the Three Kingdoms

In the troubled times of the Three Kingdoms, there is no one who is good or bad.

Cao Cao, in order to save his life, took revenge and slaughtered the city of Xuzhou in the name of revenge for killing his father, but after the establishment of the Wei State, the people lived and worked in peace and contentment.

Although Liu Bei is a hypocrite, his benevolence and righteousness are nothing more than trying to buy people's hearts, but his superficial kung fu is done well, and others are willing to die for him.

Zhang Jiao did save a lot of ordinary people, but his ultimate goal was to ask the people to work for him and become emperor.

Liu Bei and Cao Cao are all bad people, Sun Quan is reasonable, and Emperor Han Ling is needless to say, only Zhang Jiao is a good person.

Cao Cao: 1 People killed pigs to buy wine for him, and he also killed people. 2 Kill the Divine Doctor Hua Tuo. A traitor!

Liu Bei: 1 Suppressing the Yellow Turban Army, giving the people eternal suffering, and what do you say about worrying about the country and the people. 2 did not pay attention to human feelings, allied with Cao thief, and killed Lu Bu.

Emperor Ling of the Han Dynasty: Incompetent, fishy and common people, ignoring the government.

Zhang Jiao: Dedicated to the people, launched the Yellow Turban Uprising. For the people to see a doctor, they do not charge money. What a hero!

The good man has Cao Cao's name banned, and the text says, in the battle of Xiangfan, for the name of tens of thousands of soldiers, he resolutely surrendered. What kind of monk is there, that is, Guan Yu passed five passes and killed six generals, the abbot of Luoyang Huguo Temple.

Of course it's Liu Bei, Liu Bei is a good person, he won't kill the peasants, he will be good to the peasants. Then Dong Zhuo is a bad person, because he killed the peasants, and people called him Dong Thief.

There are no good people and bad people in the Three Kingdoms, Zhuge Liang stands in Wu, and Wei is a bad person. I feel that if you really want to judge a good person or a bad person, you don't have to look at his ability, but look at his personality. Such as:

Jiang Wei, Shu Han was destroyed or continued to be loyal, and in the end, he couldn't commit suicide by using a plan to recover, so he was loyal. Zhang Ren, Liu Bei entered Shu, swore not to surrender, loyal. Frustrated, Tian Feng, no matter what the lord does to them, he must do his best to be honest.

Xun Yu, who also opposed Cao Cao's claim to be king, was a big man. Zhuge Liang, in order to restore the legacy of the first emperor, six out of Qi Mountain, the stars sink into the five zhangyuan. Guan Yu and Zhang Fei, no matter how many setbacks they have suffered, have always followed Boss Liu, and Zhao Yun is the same.

Pang De, facing his coffin, is still not afraid of Guan Yu. Dian Wei and Xu Zhu, although they are all stupid, they are single-minded towards Cao Cao. And many more.

How can there be so-called good people and bad people in the Three Kingdoms, but their positions are different and the interests they represent are different There are only heroes and fools in the Three Kingdoms, there are no good people and bad people Only after watching the Three Kingdoms can you know the legendary lives of those heroes Others can't tell it In the end, you can only sigh The rolling Yangtze River is passing away, and the waves have swept away the heroes.

First of all, no. As the second floor said, there is only a difference between positions. There is no such thing as good or bad.

Secondly, if there is, look at it from the perspective of the Romance of the Three Kingdoms. It is impossible to have character deeds in all parts. How many characters appear in the Three Kingdoms. It's not something that can be sorted out in a day or two.

There are no good guys and bad guys. Because there is no one boundary to distinguish. Liu Bei crossed the river with the people.

Cao Cao also did it. Is it only Liu Beiren? Guan Yu died at the beginning.

Liu Bei disregarded the overall situation. Raise 700,000 troops to attack Wu. Just because of Guan Yu.

Zhuge Liang didn't listen to any persuasion. In the end, 700,000 troops were wiped out. Can this be said that Liu Bei is good? .

There are good and bad things about a historical figure. No one is perfect.

And now the public is too affected by the Romance of the Three Kingdoms. The Romance of the Three Kingdoms is**. Luo Guanzhong is pro-Liu and depreciates Cao. A lot of things are fake.

So people think that Liu Bei is good. Cao Cao is bad. It is recommended to watch the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, which is the official history.

There were no good people in that era, and there were no bad people, all of them were just trying to maximize their own interests, everyone was killing people, but they were just looking for different reasons, but in essence, they were all killings.

It is recommended to read the Romance of the Three Kingdoms and not to read the Romance. From a modern point of view, Lu Bu just changed jobs more frequently, and then killed the CEO of the company who was not good to him.

No matter who it is, there is good and evil. In the book, he only describes the evil side, not the good side. Books can't be trusted.

Although it is difficult to distinguish between loyalty and treachery in troubled times, people who are unkind, unrighteous, disloyal and unfilial will not be good people.

I remember struggling with this question before. In the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, Lu Bu and Lu Fengxian are really not good, the three family slaves are greedy for the beauty of Diao Chan and rebel repeatedly, Liu Bei kindly took it in and designed to seize the city, and was caught by Cao Jun, and he was cowardly and didn't want to die. Alas, it's really bad.

But in the Chronicles of the Three Kingdoms, there is another feeling, Lu Bu is a Mongolian man, tall and big, the first fierce general of the Three Kingdoms is not brave and strategic, but brave and strategic, that is a generation of talents. The Romance of the Three Kingdoms is **, and the author is also biased towards the orthodox royal Liu Bei. So everyone else writes badly.

Got it?

Lu Bu is a hero.

There is no such thing as good or bad for heroes.

all said that Liu Bei was good.

In fact, Liu Bei, a hero, is also a very scoundrel, such as entering Sichuan, and not returning Jingzhou to life or death.

Lu Bu is a martial artist, more than brave but not resourceful. Not loyal enough.

I think this guy is a window grass, see the wind swinging.

Lu Bu is indeed more courageous than strategic. The Romance of the Three Kingdoms is too exaggerated, **There are three British battles against Lu Bu. Ding Yuan is not his stepfather.

In fact, Lu Bu is like a child, very stupid and naïve, he was deceived by Dong Zhuo to kill Ding Yuan, and later he was deceived by Wang Yun to kill Dong Zhuo, but everyone was offended, plus he had no plan and couldn't accept good words, so embarrassed!!

Killing Dong Zhuo is also Dong Zhuo's bad, the teacher lost his temper and beat Lu Bu, Lu Bu himself was not disciplined, and adultered Dong Zhuo's concubine.

All in all, Lu Bu didn't do much to be bad to the people, and he can't be said to be a bad person, nor can he be said to be a good person. It's a fool.

This issue is subject to future comment.

1.The reason for Lü Bu's rebellion was too snobbish. During the Three Kingdoms period, there were generally three situations when the foyer was changed:

One is for great ambitions. For example, Xun Yu and Guo Jia abandoned Yuan Shao and voted for Cao Cao because they thought that Yuan Shao's character could not achieve great things or be reused, and he could not realize his ambition to help the world. In this case, the defector has the moral high ground, because he and the lord are not indebted, and assisting him is to achieve a great cause together, since he can't do this with this lord, it is normal to change one.

The second is to avoid disasters for safety. For example, Zhang He and Gao Ran abandoned Yuan Shao and defected to Cao Cao because Yuan Shao listened to slander, and it would be a disaster to kill him if he followed him, so he defected; Or like Xiahou Ba, who has a constant relationship with the Wei royal family, since the Sima family has set up Emperor Wei, there is no possibility that he can be tolerated, so he has to flee. In this case, the defector is justified in reason, because he has not made a mistake, but he has lost the order of the original owner, so why can't he change the lord?

Third, it is really helpless because of objective reasons. For example, Huang Quan rebelled against Liu Bei and went to Cao Wei. This is not Huang Quan's responsibility at all, originally people advised you not to levy Wu, but you didn't listen; After failing in the battle, he fled, and the Huang Quan Department in Jiangbei became a lonely army; Rather than being captured by the hostile Eastern Wu, Huang Quan should surrender to Cao Wei, who is currently living in peace.

In this case, the defector himself is not responsible, and it is purely natural and man-made, which deserves sympathy.

Let's put it this way, in Luo Guanzhong's eyes, he respects Liu and despises Cao, that is, Liu Bei is good and Cao Cao is bad. Looking further, almost only Liu Bei is Xiang Han in the whole book, and the rest are "traitors". Therefore, just from the monarch's point of view, you can also understand that except for Liu Bei, there are no good things else.

As for the subordinates, it is very complicated, the forest is big, there are all kinds of birds, and it is not easy to analyze.

Of course, there is no good or bad distinction between the three kingdoms in history.

If you become a king or lose a villain, no one has anything to say.

Fundamentally, there are no good people, they are just a group of people who compete for power.

The Romance of the Three Kingdoms is mainly biased towards Shu, so most of the good people in Shu are the bad guys.

There is also a name for calling Lu Su of Wu Guo as a good man, and the biggest bad guy should be Dong Zhuo, give you a few:

Good people: Liu Bei, Guan Yu, Zhang Fei, Zhao Yun, Zhuge Liang.

Bad guys: Dong Zhuo, Li Ru, Yuan Shu, He Jin, Ten Standing Servants.

It depends on how you think about it, there's no such thing as good or bad.

No one is a pure bad person, and no one is a pure good person, if a good person is a good person, Hua Tuo and Zhang Zhongjing are counted as one.

Regardless of the three countries.

Or reality. Everyone is for their own benefit, is it said that doing something contrary to common sense for their own sake is a bad person? To say that Cao Cao is a villain or a hero, he is also for himself.

In order to survive in the times at that time. So there's no such thing as a good guy or a bad guy.

I think Zhuge Liang is a good person, and Cao Cao is a bad person.

This is actually all for his own power, and I feel that no one is wrong.