Is China s overall national strength now considered a strong country, and is it still necessary to i

The overall national strength is average, and the so-called taoguang and obscurity are nonsense, which is used to cover up one's own problems and weaknesses, and the correct way to put it is to dig out the filth.

In terms of comprehensive national strength, China can be regarded as a world power. It's just that as the big brother of the socialist countries in the world, we must play a leading role....When the dignity of the country is undermined, it is necessary to take certain measures to preserve it. It can be seen from China's foreign policy in recent years that the Taoguang policy has a tendency to weaken.

There is a big gap in China's country, with Europe in the east and Africa in the west, and it is very one-sided to think that the whole country is advanced when we only see the advanced side. You must know that the gap between us and the advanced countries is more than 100 years.

China is not yet a strong country in general, and Germany commented that China is still a "giant with feet of clay". It is not necessary to practice Taoguang and cultivate obscurity, because a stable international environment is very conducive to China's development!

Let's make it clear...They eat like pandas, and the wealth they have accumulated is enough for their children and grandchildren for several lifetimes, and of course they themselves do not want to change their existing clothes, and if they are not touched by the wind and grass, their heads will not be protected, and they will be harmed....It does the same.

Not really, the United States bullying China is like a routine, such as iron ore, the RMB exchange rate, sending a few people in suits over for two meals can make China hurt tens of billions of billions, if you want to talk about the military, I can be skeptical after hearing about the scalp-tingling corruption of some troops. Well, our buckles are still the best.

China is not a strong country at all, and if it is constrained too much, there is no way to be tough.

There are many hostile countries in the vicinity, and there are various internal contradictions. There are no allies in the world.

China is really quite pitiful.

There is a saying that with great power comes great responsibility. When you have enough capital, you should not be sharp enough to provoke a fight, but should give full play to your ability where you need it!

At present, China is not a strong country, even if China has become a strong country, it will not fight at will, Taoguang is to make our country grow faster, war is a lose-lose thing, even if it becomes a strong country, it should be low-key.

China can only be said to be a big country, and a strong country still needs to work hard.

To be honest, we are a force to be reckoned with in the world. But it is no longer like before the reform and opening up, and it is possible to return to the political pattern of the free left and right. Now it's like a big wall grass, which side is easy to dominate the world (the two sides are:

The United States and its vassals, Russia and its vassals).

It's a bit powerful, but the surroundings are too harsh.

Not a world power! It's just a moderately developed country!

China is a strong country, but China is currently developing. Not developed countries, the United States, the United Kingdom. Count developed countries.

Today's world pattern is a super.

"How strong" refers to the United States, and "how strong" refers to the European Union, Japan, and China

country, Russia. In 1991, the Soviet Union collapsed, the Cold War ended, and the bipolar pattern also collapsed. As a historical trend, world multipolarization generally emerged in the 90s of the 20th century.

At present, China's comprehensive national strength is still good, but its hard power is not enough, and it will take a long time to develop before it is a developed country.

No, according to the comprehensive indicators, China is also a middle and upper reaches of the country.

It is considered a strong country, but it is not counted as the "super" of the United States

Whether a country is strong or not, depends on his education. Education in our country: hehe.

In terms of China's GDP, it has reached the world.

Since the second place, crushing the third place Japan, and our China began to export railway technology, professional technology, step by step in the transformation, the status of overseas Chinese is naturally getting higher and higher! In terms of military affairs, we China won the runner-up in the 2015 Russian military competition, which is not in any way inferior to the world powers! Under the policy of the Belt and Road Initiative, China's economy is booming again!

In terms of space technology, we have been at the forefront, as can be seen from the Beidou satellite system, and in some frontier fields, where our personnel have been active, and even in some fields, we are leading the world powers! But keep in mind that our country still does not belong to the developed countries, because the primary stage of socialism has only begun to move towards the intermediate stage.

After hosting the G7 summit, France's Emmanuel Macron said in a speech on August 27 that "we are experiencing the end of Western leadership."

A big country. It has begun. His recovery is an increase in national strength. This is China. The emergence of a great power. The image of a great power.

China will not lose to any country in its current strength.

Now it is very cruel that we are often bullied, and even small countries in Southeast Asia come to compete with us for islands such as Nansha, and then look at the recent news, then you will know China's national strength.

Generally speaking, the top 10 in the world is no problem, but per capita, the top 100 in the world is less!

Anyway, now the United States does not dare to touch us, and we buy all the US Treasury bonds

The definition of superpower is vague and there is no precise definition, and different sources will have different opinions.

The United States has the world's most advanced military technology and armaments, and has permanent troops stationed in many countries around the world, which can carry out missions anywhere at any time. It can deter any country in the world, has powerful military technology to lead the trend of the world's military, and has a unified military force that suppresses and influences the world. The military is only one of the necessary elements of a superpower, and it must be strong enough economically, culturally, and geographically.

Therefore, with the current comprehensive national strength, even if it surpasses Russia militarily, it will be difficult to become a superpower, and China still has a long way to go.

No.

The definition of a superpower is not only a strong military power, but also includes science and technology, culture, education, medical care, functions and so on. At present, China is far from meeting the standards of a superpower. The reasons why the United States is considered a superpower are:

Science and technology are developed, rich in culture, advanced in education, medical security, and clear functions. Of course, military strength is also an important reason why it has become a superpower.

No, a superpower has to consider many factors, such as social equity, people's living standards...At present, our great motherland is still being perfected....It is estimated that in 2050, China will be the world's superpower....By then, Japan will probably disappear from the map...

Not yet, Russia is not a superpower either, only the United States in the whole world is. Therefore, the superpower must be a country with global influence in economy, politics, culture, international influence, science and technology, etc. Our country still has a long way to go.

Russia's influence on the international community today is not as great as that of the Soviet Union during the Cold War. So even if China surpasses Russia in military power, it will not necessarily become a superpower.

Not counting now, Japan is also interested.

The United States, Japan and Germany are among the top three. Last year, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences released the 2010 Yellow Book on the World Economy and the Yellow Book on the International Situation. Among them, the "Yellow Book on the International Situation" analyzes and evaluates the comprehensive national strength of 11 countries, and believes that China's comprehensive national strength ranks seventh in the world, and China's military strength ranks second in the world.

The Yellow Book on the International Situation analyzes and evaluates the comprehensive national strength of 11 countries, and the evaluation index system includes five direct constituent elements of territory and natural resources, population, economy, military, and science and technology, as well as four influencing factors of social development, sustainability, security and domestic politics, and international contribution. The 11 countries are ranked in the order of comprehensive national strength: the United States, Japan, Germany, Canada, France, Russia, China, the United Kingdom, India, Italy, and Brazil.

Sustainability, security and domestic politics, and international contribution are four influencing factors. Japan is second in the world, while China is seventh, five places below Japan. Seek adoption.

According to the comprehensive national strength ranking of the United States in the Yellow Book of the International Situation, the United States ranks first with an absolute advantage in almost all items, far ahead of other countries. The United Kingdom, which ranks second, has certain advantages in capital, information, human capital and technology, and has an average level of natural resources. Russia ranks third, and only natural resources are in a certain advantage in terms of national resources, and it is at a considerable disadvantage in terms of technology, human capital, capital resources, and information power.

France ranks fourth, its national strength and resources rank sixth, scientific and technological strength and human capital are average, capital power and information power are strong, while natural resources are relatively backward. Germany ranks fifth, and its national resources rank fifth, but its overall technological level is relatively high, ranking third after the United States and Japan. China's comprehensive national strength ranks sixth.

The advantages of the development of China's national resources lie in the abundant labor resources, abundant capital resources, long-term stable domestic environment, and the first-class policies and guidelines for seeking progress while maintaining stability, etc., and the disadvantages lie in the backward technical level, low labor quality, backward information power, and the system, environment and infrastructure that support the innovation system are not matched, and the national resources are in a backward position as a whole. In China's national strength system, diplomatic and military strength are strong, and the first regulation power is also ranked fourth, and the economic power is ranked sixth, while the national strength resources are only higher than those of Russia and India, and the structure of national strength is unbalanced. Japan is in seventh place, with strong national resources, second only to the United States, and ranks high in all projects except natural resources.

Canada ranks eighth, its national resources rank fourth, and it has considerable advantages in natural resources, while other resources are basically ranked in the middle or lower position. South Korea ranks ninth, and its national strength and resources rank seventh, among which, the information power is strong, and the strength in other aspects is relatively weak. India is the weakest of the ten powers.

In terms of national resources, except for natural resources, which rank fifth, they are at a disadvantage in other aspects, and on the whole they are the weakest of the big countries. The Yellow Book believes that, on the whole, the development of comprehensive national strength is not achieved overnight, and the improvement of comprehensive national strength requires the balanced development of various elements in the national strength system on the one hand, and on the other hand, it is necessary to seize the commanding heights of scientific and technological progress and develop leading industries in the global innovation system. Ranking: Overall National Strength: GDP in 2004: NO1: United States, United States, NO2, United Kingdom, Japan, NO3, Russia, Germany, NO4, France, United Kingdom, NO5, Germany, France, NO6, China, China, NO7, Japan, Italy.

China itself does not recognize itself as the world's second economic power.

However, according to an October 2009 poll conducted by the French Institute, 98 percent of French, 97 percent of Italians, 96 percent of Americans, and the vast majority of those asked believe that the United States is the number one power in the world. According to the results of this survey, the second most powerful country in the world is China.

Why is China the second most powerful country in the world?

In terms of land area, China ranks third after Russia and Canada; In terms of economic strength, China's total GDP last year ranked fourth in the world, behind the United States, Japan and Germany. Based on the current economic growth rates of China and Germany, China's total GDP is likely to surpass that of Germany this year. Whether it is land area or economic strength, China is now not ranked among the top two in the world.

Why, then, does the European poll show that China is the second most powerful country in the world? A key factor is ——— China is the world's most populous country.

The "bigness" of a big country can only be called a "big country" when it has a large population. Otherwise, Australia has a large land area and a well-developed economy, but because its population is only 20 million, not many people will seriously consider Australia as a big country; India is less than half the size of Australia and has a backward economy, but because India is the second most populous country in the world, many people still regard India as a big country. If India and Australia both apply for permanent membership in the UN Security Council, India will certainly have a better chance of being elected.

China's "bigness" is first and foremost reflected in China's large population. In terms of population alone, China's status as one of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council is well deserved. Of course, to become a world power, it is not enough to have a large population.

A large population is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for becoming a world power. In the 16th and 17th centuries, Portugal, Spain, and the Netherlands became world powers, but soon flourished and declined, in part because their populations were too small to expand globally. Now the United States is the most developed country in the world, and at the same time, of all developed countries, the United States has the largest population.

If the United States had a population of only 50 million, it would not be possible for the United States to become the world's number one power, even if its per capita GDP doubled from what it is now. At present, the fertility rate in most developed countries is well below the replacement level (i.e., the average number of children per woman), with the exception of the United States, which has just reached the replacement level. The United States has been able to maintain a steady population growth due to its high birth rate and the advantages of immigration.

The demographic advantage of the United States is an important factor in the rise of the United States.