The main characteristics of information philosophy, the conceptual relationship between information

In terms of understanding the concept of knowledge, it is generally believed that "knowledge is a result of knowledge"; The disagreement stems mainly from different interpretations of the "outcome". The author believes that the necessary conditions for constituting "cognitive results" are the correctness and value of understanding. In other words, knowledge is a correct and valuable understanding.

information", there are at least 3

Definition of types. The first is an ontological definition, which is characterized by the fact that it is based on the understanding that everything has information of its own. The second is the epistemological definition, which refers to the part of ontological information that is perceived and recognized by people or artificial information.

For example, Professor Zhong Yixin defines these two types of information as follows: "Information is the state and mode of movement of things, that is, the state and mode of the internal structure of things, and the state and mode of external relations of things". "Information is the expression of the state and mode of motion of things, or rather, the generalized knowledge of the state and mode of motion of things" {

The third definition is defined from the perspective of communication engineering. Shennong defines information as "the difference between two uncertainties" and considers information to eliminate uncertainty.

Because of the differences in the definition of the concepts of information and knowledge, people's understanding of the relationship between the two is naturally different, mainly as follows5

Perspective: Knowledge is part of the information. Many people hold this view.

Information is part of knowledge. For example, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) believes that "the concept of knowledge is much broader than information".

Information equals knowledge. For example, "information itself is knowledge, and it is the basis for updating knowledge."

There is a partial cross-cutting relationship between information and knowledge in terms of extension. For example, ".

The view of the book Theory of Knowledge.

Information and knowledge "are two different kinds of concepts, and there is no simple inclusion or cross-section".

Knowledge is the correct understanding of value, and information is the reflection of the attributes of things. The former is the result of human cognition, and the latter is the character that all things have. The two have similarities and differences, complement each other, and transform each other under certain conditions.

The correctness and value attributes of knowledge, the universality and objective existence of information, are sometimes ignored or even denied to varying degrees, but in fact, dialectical understanding of them is very important for correctly defining and mastering these two concepts.

In practice, human beings have gradually formed a variety of specific knowledge, which can be roughly summarized into three categories: one is the knowledge of understanding and transforming nature, and the knowledge of natural sciences, such as physics, chemistry, biology, etc.; The first category is the knowledge of understanding and transforming society, and the knowledge of social sciences, such as psychology and logic. Philosophy is a discipline in which human beings generalize, summarize and reflect on various knowledge of nature, society and thinking.

Concrete science explains the laws and mysteries of nature, society, and a specific field of thinking, and philosophy makes new generalizations and sublimations of them, from which the most general essence and the most universal laws are abstracted.

And the information science you are talking about is one of the concrete sciences.

The two have nothing to do with each other, just as optics has nothing to do with philosophy.