Classical Literature vs. Modern Literature Debate Draft

It is necessary to clarify the issue of popular literature and classical masterpieces, and not to fight in a blind way. It is necessary to unify the definition before it can be discussed, otherwise, it is likely to become a chicken talking about chicken feathers and a duck talking about duck webbing. No result.

It is necessary to clarify the topic of LZ first, and take everyone to the ditch to have a melee.

1. Popular literature does not correspond to classical masterpieces. It would be misleading to discuss this correspondence. Popular literature corresponds to the response.

When it is pure literature, elegant literature, and high literature; 2. Popular literature is washed through the great waves of history, and the reader's choice to read may eventually be passed on to future generations and become a classical masterpiece in the eyes of future generations, for example, there are both popular literature and elegant literature in the middle of the four famous works. But they.

are all classical literature, such as Jin Yong's martial arts**, which are loved by many people and are very popular, but who can say that it will not become a classical masterpiece in the near future?

3. It is even more inappropriate to say that classical masterpieces are developed from the popular. As mentioned above, there is little need to be said. But it's still long-winded. To conclude at this point, lz may mean that high literature developed from popular literature. If the author doesn't look away, then let's start from this, elegant literature and popular literature are two opposite literary genres, one elegant and one vulgar, elegant and white, popular and approachable, there is no one who is the origin of the ancestors. The first literature should have been oral literature first, and then there was literature.

words, there is written literature. At that time, the society was underdeveloped, the level of civilization was not high, the vocabulary was not rich, the writing lacked skills, there was less ability to depict and describe, and there was no literary theory to divide the works into elegant and vulgar, so it could only be called primary literature and simple literature. Later, the society went on.

step, the degree of civilization gradually increased and changed, and literature also developed, began to produce genres, began to differentiate genres, and then there was literary theory, which gradually produced and divided the so-called elegant literature, popular literature, and even military literature, local literature, and then as for the updated categories of secretary literature.

In conclusion, classical literature did not develop from popular literature at all. As like as an apple to an oyster.

1.In fact, popular literature and literary masterpieces have played their own roles in various periods. Popular literature is the root of literary masterpieces, and literary masterpieces are the sublimation of popular literature. Add a time category to the impact, say modern.

If we look at this period in modern times, I believe that popular literature has a greater influence than literary masterpieces, and popular literature must be the foundation, and literary masterpieces are developed from it, and people are more willing to accept and absorb popular literature, because it is easy to understand, while literary masterpieces require people to have a certain ideological background to analyze the principles or philosophies expounded in famous works.

2.Literary masterpieces are valuable. Literary masterpieces are classics of both thought and art, and are the pride of a country and a nation.

A nation without a masterpiece is pathetic, and a nation that has a masterpiece but is far from it is even more pathetic. Up and down for thousands of years, from Qu Yuan to Bingxin, you have to read; Tens of thousands of miles, from Goethe to Pushkin, also read. Lu Xun is especially mentioned.

Lu Xun was a great thinker, revolutionary, and writer in China. Many middle school students don't like to read Lu Xun's articles. They would rather spend time in Zhou Zuoren's bitter rain and in Qiong Yao's "Deep Love, Rainy and Misty", rather than stay in Lu Xun's Baicao Garden.

This can't help but make me feel a little stunned. Lu Xun's books are rich in calcium and iron, reading them can clear the heart, clear the eyes, strengthen the bones, and invigorate the blood, read some Lu Xun's books, you can use his eyes to examine the world, use his brain to think about life, use his iron shoulders to provoke the heavy responsibility of history, and use his righteousness to sweep away unhealthy trends!

Since they can be separated and independent, it means that they are hungry with their own characteristics, and there is no affiliation.

What topic? Debating what?

1. The literary aspects of the meaning and value of life of the ancients;

2. The enthusiasm for tea and wine in ancient literature, that is, the study of ancient tea culture and wine culture;

3. Ancient literature has a soft spot for landscapes;

4. The tendency of dissolute wreckage in ancient literature;

5. The portrayal of characters in ancient literature;

6. The study of the value of love in ancient literature;

7. The study of the worship of classics in ancient literature.

First of all, this topic of yours is super boring, and a little ignorant, in addition, the four famous works are semi-vernacular, and if you want to read real classical Chinese, you must first have the ability to read classical Chinese, and the translations are all out of taste.

1. You must insist that it is not only modern literature that can cultivate sentiment. They are likely to attack you with questions such as: Aren't the Analects and the Tao Te Ching cultivating sentiments?

We admit that classical literature is very capable of cultivating sentiments, and we also recognize the excellence of the essence of the Tao Te Ching, the Analects, and the Four Great Classics, but we ask the opponent not to take advantage of the loopholes of logic, and our thesis is that modern literature can cultivate people's sentiments [more].

2. As a person who has knowledge of literature, you will understand that vernacular literature is not equal to modern literature, and classical Chinese is not equal to classical literature. The so-called classical Chinese is just formed by the people of the ancient ** article imitating the pre-Qin language. The dividing point between modern literature and classical literature lies in the New Culture Movement, and the fundamental difference lies in cultural orientation.

The dividing point between modern literature and classical literature lies in the New Culture Movement, and the fundamental difference lies in cultural orientation. By the end of the Qing Dynasty, classical literature had reached a dead end, and the change sought by the New Culture Movement was to be human, to live, and to be human.

It is a kind of revolution and liberation of national thought. We do not deny the significance of classical literature to the nation, nor do we deny the edifying role of classical literature, but we must understand that the wheel of history will not change, and the road ahead may be tortuous, but it will never go backwards. As young people in the new century, we should understand that our historical mission is liberation.

Only when we understand the question of direction can we have the meaning of edification. Only by better accepting the essence of modern literature, being human, being human, and being free, can we truly have our own temperament and truly be our own people.

In addition, it is not shy to say that classical literature belongs to the aristocracy, and there are not many people who are really commoners, and the commoners do not even have the right to choose their own thoughts, this is feudalism, and this is the origin of Chinese servility. For thousands of years, the minds of our people have been manufactured, and in such a day, can the direction of culture be the real direction, can it be liberated? Is it possible to find a way out for the nation?

Only by breaking this shackle must we find our own thoughts and be ourselves. Anyone who knows a little about modern literature knows that what I said is the direction proposed by the New Culture Movement, and isn't this a clear proof that modern literature is easier to cultivate sentiments?

The outcome of today's debate was decided 100 years ago. The victory of the New Culture Movement has thoroughly told us what belongs to us and what can really succeed! Any perverse approach is bound to fail.

This concludes the body of the answer, and I have another suggestion, you should simply change your point of view, neither the pros nor the cons. In the right language, knock out this boring topic, and I'm sure you'll get a full house.

Modern literature is vernacular, write what you say, the language is relatively straightforward, lacking the charm of classical literature, but it can benefit the public, easy to grasp, and convenient to communicate.

Classical literature, with the cultural heritage of thousands of years of cultural development, is delicious to read and has an endless aftertaste. In your spare time, drink a cup of tea, read classical literature, feel the literary atmosphere, and savor it, so that people have infinite space for reverie.

Literature is originally full of spring and snow, and only with a high level of literary accomplishment can it be understood and felt.

Literature is a kind of ideological literature that uses words as the carrier, don't stick too much to the form, what you think is meaningful, what is good.

What we are talking about now is called modern vernacular.

During the Ming and Qing dynasties, there was also a kind of vernacular script called ancient vernacular script, which was closer to classical Chinese than the current vernacular script.

The four great works are written in the ancient vernacular.

I'm a major in modern literature, so I don't have time to say a few words. Sentiment is the comprehensive quality of emotion, will, rationality, morality, etc., as a modern person who has developed more complex aspects of emotion, will, rationality, and morality, how can he follow the simple and underdeveloped set of things in ancient literature? For example, classical Chinese literature lacks scientific rationality, spiritual freedom, equality, fraternity, democracy, human rights, and legal system. Morality is at the service of the feudal order; Emotions are suppressed and not in accordance with human nature.

Aren't these all things that have only been gradually developed and perfected since modern times? In addition, the text, the vernacular, is of course more understandable than the classical Chinese; The benefits of cultivating sentiment in classical literature have not been lost after the New Culture Movement, and have been inherited in modern literature, for example, in Yu Pingbo Bingxin and others, modern vernacular literature still has a classical aesthetic temperament.

The four great works are, of course, classical literature. You can say that classical literature is more literary in terms of the opposite.

I have a warm and happy home, at home, full of love and joy. The humor of the father, the kindness of the mother, made our home more welcoming.

One sunny morning, on the evening train, my father and mother arrived in the capital, Beijing. As soon as you hear the good news, the "Family Challenge" game: happiness in the North Ring Road supermarket next to the nine.

My father and mother hurriedly put their things at the hotel and went to register. The game is about to begin!

Inning: Parents' children are sandwiched in the middle, legs tied with ropes, and the first home win with three to reach the finish line. Ready for a gunshot, my mom and dad quickly rushed to the finish line, and I walked in the sum of the laws, different parents at home, mom and dad simply stood up and walked.

Haha, calm down, I really like the feeling of flying, I look back and see that the other family is getting farther and farther away from us, should immediately come to the end of it. Mouth! We won the first game!

I am very happy.

Bureau: Relay race, parents and children run, one by one, the first to finish on the process to their victory! My mother and father stood up as the boss because my father was the fastest and I stood up and my mother last.

Dad every day, running until now, running dad is Zhang Fei's eating bean sprouts - a piece of cake. When it was my turn, I swallowed like a brave dash forward, pulling away from my mother when mom ran easier. The hard work paid off, and we still won the second game!

I was very excited.

Bureau: Telepathy, parent gestures for children to guess. This is a test competition between parents and children, the heart of India.

Start the game, mom and dad nervous gestures, I guess nervous. I don't know if the wordcards are too simple, or if I'm too smart, and soon you guess the end, and all right!

In this case, the presenter announced: the winner of the "family competition"? Tsai Sister's Family os Transportation (Registered, Host Makes His Family Famous, My Crew's)!

Wow? I jumped three feet tall with excitement, and saw that my father and mother were tired and sweaty, and their faces were flushed, and my father smiled, and her mother laughed even more overjoyed. I approached my father and mother, and I had a pair of soft hands to help and mom and dad wiped their sweat and the applause of the bystanders congratulated us.

After receiving the prize, our happiness was like a bird, holding it back to the hotel.

This game, so my perfect home, the warmth of home, the warmth of home, the fun of home, everything in the house is so beautiful!

Yes! I love my home, I love my family!

The development process of ancient prose in China: (1) Pre-Qin prose: including Zhuzi prose and historical prose.

Zhuzi's prose is dominated by discourses, such as the Analects, Mencius, and Zhuangzi; Historical prose is an essay based on historical topics, and all articles and books that describe historical events and historical figures are historical essays, such as "Zuo Biography". 2) Prose of the Han Dynasty: Sima Qian's "Historical Records" in the Western Han Dynasty pushed biographical prose to an unprecedented peak.

After the Eastern Han Dynasty, individual prose forms such as books, notes, tablets, inscriptions, treatises, and prefaces began to appear. Tang and Song Dynasty prose: Under the impetus of the ancient literature movement, the writing of prose became more and more complicated, and literary prose appeared, producing many excellent landscape travelogues, fables, biographies, essays and other works, and the famous "Eight Masters of the Tang and Song Dynasties" also emerged at this time.

3) Ming Dynasty prose: First, there were "Seven Sons" who mainly imitated antiquity, and then there were Tang and Song factions who advocated that the works "all flow out of the chest", and the more famous one is Gui Youguang. Qing Dynasty Prose:

The prose of the Qing Dynasty, represented by the Tongcheng School, paid attention to the embodiment of "righteousness". Yao Nai, a representative writer of the Tongcheng School, summarized the ancient prose style in China and divided it into 13 categories, including debates, prefaces, recitals, writings, gift prefaces, edicts, pleadings, inscriptions, miscellaneous sayings, proverbs, praises, resignations, and mourning.