Why would many Americans prefer their houses to be swept away rather than build with concrete?

Many Americans would rather have their houses swept away than build with concrete becauseWe all know that real estate and land in the United States are owned by individuals, but they are also subject to property taxes.

The United States is vast and sparsely populated. The United States has a land area similar to China, but the population of the United States is just over 300 million. At one time, the per capita area was several times that of China.

Moreover, the United States has a high forest cover, so timber resources are very abundant and the cost is low. So a lot of Americans like to take local materials and build their own houses like building blocks. In contrast, building a house with concrete is more troublesome.

We need to find a professional construction team to transport various machinery such as mixers, pump lights, etc. The cost is also relatively high.

Because the United States uses more wood in the construction of houses, the United States has formed a planned, modular building when building houses. The houses built are not only fireproof, heat insulation, and sound insulation, but also have a short construction period and low requirements for the construction environment. Therefore, Americans prefer to build houses out of wood rather than concrete.

In general, the state property tax is generally between 2% and 2% of the value of the property. Therefore, the lower the total price of the home, the lower the annual property tax. If you build your own house, the most expensive material is natural stone, followed by concrete.

And real estate taxes in the United States cover not only the cost of building a house, but also the cost of demolishing it. Concrete houses are indeed sturdy, but they are also difficult to dismantle. To save money on property taxes, many Americans choose to build their homes out of wood instead of concrete.

The reason why Americans choose wood to build houses is because of the abundant wood resources and low costHousing taxes can be lowered, and the insurance industry does not have to worry about property damage.

This is because they don't believe in concrete structures. They believe that concrete structures are very unstable.

Because they think that the concrete house is not good to have a constrained feeling, it is very uncomfortable.

Maybe the cost of building a house with concrete is too great, so they won't use it.

Because Americans have their own ideas, they don't like concrete as a material.

Because the use of concrete ** is relatively high, and it is not very environmentally friendly, it is not good.

This is mainly because of some of their habits, which is why they are like this.

I think it's probably a belief on their part, that's why this happens.

Probably because concrete is not readily available in the United States.

I think it's mainly because the United States has very expensive requirements for concrete, and I don't want it.

Because this thing is a habit of their life, that's why it's like this.

With the development of the world's scientific and technological civilization, the way people build houses and the materials used are also different, such as concrete steel bars, trees, or the combination of thermal insulation foam board and steel plate, etc., but in most of the high-rise building construction bureaus, Pukuan Laqian Tong uses concrete steel bars, because the house built with it is more durable and durable, and the use time is longer! But why in the United States, where most people would rather have their homes swept away by a hurricane than build them out of concrete? Is it to save costs?

First, cost savings are one of the reasons why Americans are reluctant to use concrete to build their homes. Because if you use concrete to build a house, not only do you have to pay a super high cost for raw materials such as cement and steel bars, but also the process of building a house with concrete is more complicated, so you need to hire a professional engineering team to carry out construction to ensure the safety and quality of the house, but it is also a lot of money to ask the engineering team! Therefore, building a house without using concrete is indeed a way to save costs!

Second, in addition to cost savings, it also has to do with the geography of the United States. The United States is comparable in land area to China, but its population is less than one-third of China's, and its forest coverage area is also several times that of China! Therefore, Americans often use wood to build houses, not only because the country has abundant wood, which greatly reduces the cost of building houses, but also because houses built with trees are more comfortable.

In addition, the United States is also a country where natural disasters such as hurricanes are frequent, so building a house with wood is a more suitable choice than concrete, because of its relatively light weight, that is, it is prudent to destroy and collapse the house, and it will not cause too much damage to people, let alone great property damage!

Therefore, for all these reasons, some Americans would rather have their houses swept away and destroyed than build houses out of clean earth!

Because the economic conditions of the Americans are not so good, the concrete to build a house is not so cheap, and the labor cost is not as expensive as the hail, and the time to build the house is also very long, the Americans do state that it is to save costs, and not to build a house with concrete.

Yes, the behavior of the stove is to save costs, and to save a lot of money in life, I think the safety factor of this practice is not very high.

Of course not. Because all the houses in the United States are covered by the insurance company, if the house is transferred, the insurance company will build a new one.

I don't think that's the case, the main thing is that they are environmentally friendly, and they are very environmentally conscious, and the wood is relatively cheap, and the most important factor is that they introduce very high taxes to the house.

It must be to save money and protect the environment, so I will build a house in this way, which looks very strong and will not leak wind and rain.

It's true, it's to save costs, that's why so many people are chosen, but this approach is not particularly good.

As we all know, the United States is a disaster-prone area, and forest fires, volcanic eruptions, and violent storms have their share, but strangely, in areas with high tornadoes, Americans still choose to build houses with wood instead of solid structures such as reinforced concrete.

Housing and real estate is a serious matter for our countrymen, and for a young person with average financial ability and no real estate at present, it is a goal that he will continue to strive for within a few years. Because the value of real estate in most developed areas of China is very high, not only does it take a relatively long time to build a property, but also buyers need to spend a long time to make money to buy real estate. Most of them don't have an excessive desire for property possession.

One of the more typical is the United States.

And it is not difficult for us to find that the apartment families in the United States live are generally wooden, from an economic point of view, Americans need to pay a certain percentage of property tax for their property, this tax is assessed according to the actual value of the property, that is to say, the more expensive your property is, then you need to pay more property tax, so that compared with the brick and concrete structure of the house, the cost of wooden houses is generally low, so the residents need to pay a lower property tax. That's one of the reasons for that.

In addition, for the United States, from the perspective of historical development, their habit of using wood for building houses has been formed for a long time, because the national history of the United States is relatively short compared to other traditional countries, and they are very much in favor of this easy-to-build building model, so to a large extent, it is the building habits of ordinary people.

From a cultural point of view, Americans do not have a strong desire for a fixed residence, on the other hand, there will always be a tradition in our country: "falling leaves return to the roots" makes us eager to find a place of their own, but Americans will choose to leave their original residence many times in their lives, moving is a must for most Americans to experience in a lifetime, so there is not so much preference for brick and concrete houses. It can be known that the main building in the city still adopts the brick and concrete structure, which is also in line with the social development of the main layer.

Why would Americans rather have their houses swept away than build them out of concrete? I've read the long knowledge.

Some Americans build their houses out of wood and insist on using concrete, which has something to do with their culture and economy.

Building a house in the United States has to pay a certain percentage of property tax, this property tax will not change because of the construction materials you use, the value of the house depends on its location, area, surrounding infrastructure, as well as transportation, education, so they will not use too expensive concrete materials, wood is also very cheap, so many people use wood to build houses.

In the United States, building a house with wood is really cheap.

Labor costs are very expensive in the United States.

Now the United States has an industrial system of building houses out of wood.

The United States is rich in forest resources, and now the technology of modular splicing houses is very mature, and people are more willing to build wooden houses, and the cost will not be too stressful.

Environmental protection is a large part of the reason, construction wood is easy to handle! Concrete demolition will produce a lot of garbage.

Maybe Americans aren't used to concrete houses.

Although the houses built by Americans are beautiful but not strong, they all say that Americans are very frugal, and houses built of concrete are expensive.

Because houses made of concrete are expensive, they all build their own houses to live in.

The main reason is that the value of building a house with concrete is relatively large, so the tax paid is more.

If you build a concrete house in the United States, the cost is very large, so you will not build a house with concrete.

Maybe in a developed country like the United States, the cost of concrete is too high, so they are reluctant to use it.

That's because of their traditional habits and local conditions. It is easy to get the materials to make those wooden houses.

1. A wooden house is more down-to-earth, and living in a wooden house is a high-end enjoyment. 2. It can accommodate a large number of wooden houses, indicating that the area is vast and sparsely populated, which is a symbol of wealth.

The taxes paid are different, the concrete structure houses are heavy and expensive, and the taxes paid every year are very heavy.

Because houses in the United States are mainly large residential properties and high speculative costs, on the other hand, American housing freehold property rights have property taxes.

Alas, the inhabitants of every country have their own habitual way of thinking, so why do they have to change?

Property tax is charged according to the house price, how cheap and how to build, and the houses in those rich areas are basically made of permanent materials.

Because the American people are highly mobile, and paying taxes in the United States is the first person, so many people have to move many times in their lives.

Is it because of saving money??Or are you afraid of the tofu slag project?

The house in the United States has to pay taxes every year, the concrete tax rate is high, it is very uneconomical, the insurance company pays for the damage of the wooden house, and the people of the United States have no household registration, and the mobility is large, so the construction period of the wooden house is very short, which is very suitable.

First, the legal system guarantees that the consequences of indiscriminate trespassing in private houses are serious. Second, all people are armed with guns, and if they enter private property without permission, they will be shot or killed. Third, the social welfare is good, and there are few burglaries and robberies for the poor. Fourth, the cost is low, the construction period is short, the maintenance and renovation are environmentally friendly.

It is easy to change, Caucasian people have strong innovation ability and strong mobility, and they don't want to be bound to a certain place for a lifetime, so the house is to live in, not to live for a lifetime, and the developer of speculation will not dare to make a fortune.

As we all know, the United States is a disaster-prone area, and forest fires, volcanic eruptions, and violent storms have their share, but strangely, in areas with high tornadoes, Americans still choose to build houses with wood instead of solid structures such as reinforced concrete.

We all know that there are frequent bad weather situations like tsunamis, tornadoes, and so on in some parts of the United States. This has also caused serious property damage and personal injury to the American people. However, the reason why it is so serious is also because of the special structure of American houses.

Most of the houses in the U.S. are built using wood, not concrete, as we do back home. This is because the United States has a large land area, abundant forest resources, and relatively cheap timber. In some rural areas of the United States, many people have their own farms, and there are many trees on the farms that they have grown.

Due to the abundance of raw materials and the low cost, wood is the best choice for building a house. Moreover, the construction period required to build this kind of house is short, the cost is low, the investment is low, and the requirements for the construction environment are less.

In contrast, if a house is built with concrete. First of all, it costs a lot of money to buy raw materials。Some large tools are also required, such as mixers, pump trucks, etc.

If you want to build a wooden house, you only need one or two people to complete it. Therefore, some construction teams had to be invited to come to the construction work, but it also required a large amount of money to be paid to the construction team. In the United States, a worker's daily wage is much higher than the salary of a normal white-collar worker, which also makes it unaffordable for the general public.

Moreover, there is also a strange tax in the United States, which requires taxes to build a house and to demolish a house.

In the United States, even if a hurricane destroys a house, it is just a loss of moneyAnd most people have insurance for their homes, so if their homes are damaged in a natural disaster, they can also get a good insurance premium.