Are words like people? Why can t you talk about people in books?

Kang Sheng's calligraphy and painting are compared to Qi Baishi,Saying that the wooden stick is better than Guo Moruo's writing, is it arrogant or true talent, I think it is real talent and real learning, and it is a kind of self-confidence. Skilled people generally look down on others. Regardless of politics, just looking at calligraphy, Kang Sheng is definitely a talent, he is versatile, in calligraphy, painting, collection, appreciation have a relatively deep study, his calligraphy is called "Kangti", at that time also had a greater influence.

Kang Sheng is a well-known figure in the modern book world, and only talented people think that they will be higher, which is part of self-confidence, and cannot be said to be arrogant. Kang Sheng is not only good at calligraphy, painting attainments are also very high, many friends who learn calligraphy should know something about him, especially the interesting things between him and Guo Moruo, one of them,Kang Sheng once said in a letter: When it comes to calligraphy, I use a wooden stick between my toes to write better than Guo Moruo.

This may be a joke. There is no way to verify whether this sentence is true or false, but this should not be groundless. On the one hand, this sentence shows that Kang Sheng really looks down on Guo Moruo's calligraphy, and on the other hand, it shows how confident Kang Sheng is in his calligraphy.

Since ancient times, literati have been contemptuous, and it is reported that Kang Sheng has a very high opinion of himself in calligraphy and painting, and this sentence sums up why Kang Sheng spoke like that. He believes that the level of his calligraphy and painting is not inferior to Qi Baishi, so he has a pen name called Lu Chishui, which corresponds to Qi Baishi. Kangsheng Zhencao Seal is capable of all bodies, especially good Zhangcao, self-contained, can be called everyone.

And for his calligraphy level, Kang Sheng has always been quite conceited. It is said that Kang Sheng wrote on a note from the General Office of the President of the People's Republic of China in the 50s of the last century: Comrade Flounder:

When it comes to calligraphy, I use a wooden stick between my toes to write better than Guo Moruo.

In fact, it is really impossible to compare, one is a politician, the other is a writer, and their calligraphy and painting are also limited to mastery and exquisite skills. However, as Wang Li once said in "Wang Li's Reflections": Kang Sheng is the biggest calligrapher in our party and one of the greatest calligraphers in contemporary China.

He also cited a passage from Mr. Chen Shutong before his death as evidence: There are four great calligraphers in contemporary China, namely Kang Sheng, Guo Moruo, Qi Yanming, and Shen Yinmo.

Who has good calligraphy between Kang Sheng and Guo Moruo? Is it true that Kang Sheng said that he writes better than Guo Moruo with a pen between his feet? In my opinion, Kang Sheng's words are not as good as Guo Moruo's.

Let's just say one reason: Kang Sheng's education is inferior to Guo's. Kang Sheng went to Shanghai to study at the age of 26, joined the group at the age of 27, and then began to engage in sports.

At the age of 35, he went abroad for the first time, and he studied at the Lenin Institute in the Soviet Union

At the age of 45, in order to cater to the life-saving movement, he made a report called "Rescuing the Lost", labeling a large group of people as traitors and enemy agents. Guo Moruo studied in Japan at the age of 22, knew Japanese, English, Russian, and German, published a collection of poems "Goddess" before the age of 30, and started a creative club with Yu Dafu and others - at this time he was a typical literary and artistic youth. Later, Guo also joined the revolution, and was immediately wanted, exiled to Japan, when he was in his 30s, he studied oracle bone inscriptions and gold inscriptions in Japan, and was listed as "four halls", and Luo Zhenyu, Wang Guowei, and Dong Zuobin were equally famous.

In which field can Kang Sheng be as famous as Guo Moruo? Kang Sheng does have a deep love for calligraphy, cultural relics, and ancient books, but he did not have Guo Moruo's conditions when he was a child, although he was also a small landlord, but he was not a scholarly family, and his grandfather was just a tribute. When I was a child, I didn't have enough cultural classes, and when I grew up and got old, I tried my best to make up for it.

Kang Sheng always wanted to make some achievements in this area. It is very likely that Kang Sheng did say that "holding a pen between his feet is better than Guo Moruo's writing", which is also a kind of inferiority complex for him. Because Guo Moruo will not compare with him at all.

But today, the phrase is circulating. Many people really believe that Kang Sheng's words are better than Guo Moruo's. This is also normal, and many people can't tell the difference between Kang Sheng's cursive and Wang Duo's cursive writing.

The seal script of Kang Sheng and the seal script of Deng Shiru are pasted into names, and many people can't distinguish them. Originally, the aesthetics of calligraphy are subjective to the public.

Kang Sheng doesn't look down on Guo Moruo, his calligraphy and painting are comparable to Baishi, arrogant or really level?

The fake Kang Sheng's so-called letter belittleing Guo Moruo's calligraphy has long been refuted. Kang Sheng is very humble and low-key in front of Guo, and he has great respect for Guo Moruo, president of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and chairman of the China Federation of Literary and Art Circles!

Kang Sheng is still a thief, and he took away a lot of calligraphy and painting masterpieces and ancient books of literature and history in the name of borrowing in the Forbidden City and Rong Bao Zhai. He was not a Communist, but an extremely insidious and cunning villain.

I hold a pen between my feet and write better than Kang Sheng. It's a joke. Judging from the handwriting, Kang Sheng is a floating and light person, not thick and immoral.

When he was alive, the relationship between the cadres and the masses was very close, and I remember that when Kang Sheng went to the first life, the newspaper spoke highly of him, how did he suddenly become a political problem?

Guo Moruo is useless, especially for Beijing's municipal construction and China's archaeological industry, which has played an extremely bad role, and his character and poetry are even more stinking and unbeatable.

Kang Sheng's calligraphy is indeed much stronger than Guo's! Whether handwriting (painting) is good or bad, it has no inevitable relationship with whether it is smart or not, but it is definitely related to a certain talent.

There are standards for whether calligraphy and painting are good or not, one is to create a personal style, the second is good kung fu and a sense of nature, and the third is good composition. Kang Sheng has no personal style, deliberately artificially unnatural, only the composition is okay.

Kang Sheng's calligraphy and painting can only be said to be okay, he compares the words with Guo Moruo, which is a comparison between radish and cabbage, both of which are home-cooked dishes; His paintings are compared with Qi Baishi, which is the comparison of craftsmanship between a halfway carpenter and a fine carpenter. Boasting is a sign of his weakness and lack of self-confidence.

Mao once instructed his son Tuo Kangsheng to be Kang Sheng's "emperor teacher", and the Guo Dynasty Qin Duchu saw the wind and made the rudder despised by Mao, and also despised by Kang Sheng, who had a versatile political vision, thinking, and unique means.

Guo Moruo and Kang Sheng are not on the same level at all, there is no comparison, as for painting, what I can say is that Kang Sheng's level is by no means below Mr. Shiraishi, and he deserves to be called a generation of grandmasters.

Kang's character is taken from the law chapter grass, but it is not mature. Guo's words are free and full of personality, and he is like a person who is too entwined in his pen.

Kang Sheng's calligraphy and painting compare himself to Baishi, arrogant or really level? Can't even look down on Guo Moruo? A: Yes, there is really a level.

Kang character chapter grass, there is an ancient taste, but there is no own appearance. Guo word against the front of the hidden front, the pen is strong, the strength of the horizontal and vertical skimming points are complete, its own appearance, so the Guo word Gao Kang word!

Kang Sheng's calligraphy attainments are indeed good, but they are not commensurate with his arrogance! The reason why he is so "confident" stems from political capital, just like a "big boss" leader, patting and pointing at the secretary next to him.

With the continuous development of Chinese calligraphy, from the early oracle bone inscription to the formation of calligraphy forms such as small seals, official scripts, and regular scripts, each historical period has produced different forms and styles of writing. It may be due to the change of dynasties, or it may be a change in people's customs and feelings. In fact, the history of Chinese calligraphy also has a subtle aspect to Chinese history, and among the many Chinese calligraphers, many of them have their own works and are well known to everyone, let me give you a few examples.

Wang Xizhi, a calligrapher in the Eastern Jin Dynasty, loves calligraphy since childhood, has a variety of skills, and is good at sealing. His calligraphy is a good study of official script, cursive, regular script, and calligraphy, imitating many people, distinguishing right from wrong, breaking away from the style of the Han and Wei dynasties, and becoming a generation of famous masters. Unrestrained and natural, the writing is tactful and subtle.

Once, Wang Xizhi, Sun Lin and other more than 40 people improvised poems in Shaoxing and gathered these poems together, which is famous"Orchid Pavilion Preface"。This draft has twenty-eight lines and three hundred and twenty-four words. It describes the scene of the literati orphanage at that time.

The author said that because of the peerless geographical effect at that time, he could no longer express his thoughts in later generations. There are more than 20 characters in this work, and the fonts are also different. <>

Yan Zhenqing was a calligrapher of the Tang Dynasty, who was good at writing the number of lines and regular script, and his strong italic style had a profound influence on the later form of opening writing. Yan Zhenqing's real book is majestic and dignified, slowly changing from the original slender shape to a square, with round and concentrated square characters. The penmanship is strong and powerful, and he is very good at the center.

Yan Zhenqing's calligraphy works are vigorous and vigorous, reflecting the prosperous scene of the Tang Dynasty, unified with his noble personality characteristics, interpreting the words as his person, his representative works "Self-written Confession", "Yan's Family Temple Tablet" and so on. <>

Ouyang Xun was also a famous calligrapher in the Tang Dynasty, and every stroke of his calligraphy seems to have been carefully thought out before writingHis handwriting is well-proportioned and the thickness of the font is moderate, and he continues to study the skills of writing in the process of practicing calligraphy, which has a great reference effect on later generations. His representative works include "On the Use of Brushes", "Thirty-six Laws" and so on.

What the author is saying is that modern information will not improve understanding between people. (How to write the argument for the pros and cons of the debate). What you say will not improve.

I'm posting in line with other people's opinions. (Not original) I took some of the information and combined it. You don't have to look for it.

Let's get started! Modern forms of information exchange do not improve understanding between people.

Positive: We believe that modern ways of communicating information will improve understanding between people. Why? Our views are as follows.

1. Modern information exchange methods are faster, more convenient and easier to communicate than before. If you have something, you can communicate immediately when you turn on your phone, so you don't have to run around.

2. Timid people don't dare to communicate head-on, it's different on the Internet, and you can recognize many new friends to communicate online, which increases the understanding between people.

Opposite: We oppose the positive side's point of view. We do not believe that it will improve understanding between people. Our views are as follows.

1. Only when people eat and chat together and communicate face-to-face, so that they can be more warm and have feelings.

2. The information exchange does not know the true face of the other party, and this kind of communication is very unfamiliar.

3. If the other party is a bad person, has an attempt on you, and gives you money to get some information after you have a good relationship, it is not for nothing that they will deceive you into some information.

In the past, people had the ends of the world, and in the past, people had different corners of the world, but now people are.

There will be no increase in the number of modern means of information exchange.

Yes: Because of this debate and the modern way of exchanging information, will it increase the affection between people? It's similar.

If you understand him, then there will be feelings. Some people say what if he's a bad guy? You see that many people want to build a girlfriend group on the Internet, what kind of online dating, a group of children are not afraid of you are afraid of a der.

And what you're asking is what to do in case the bad guy arrives? In that case, won't it increase the understanding between people? I'm telling you, actually, you can.

Do you think, why should a person deceive people, isn't it because he is desperate? So, it can still be increased.

First of all, it can be said that modern information exchange makes it more convenient for people to communicate with each other, and this is not to increase the understanding between people. Although it is more convenient for the counterparty to communicate, it seems that people are more distant from each other, and it cannot increase the understanding between people.

I don't think that the current way of information exchange will increase the feelings between people, only when people eat and chat together, face-to-face communication and communication will produce feelings, so the information age is sometimes a cold era, so people still have to come out to communicate.

The unpopularity of the Jews is caused by historical reasons, mainly in religious issues.

1. Jews have a strong ability to resist assimilation and are less inclusive

Judaism provides Jews with a cultural and identity identity that allows them to assert their set of values even after losing their territory, ethnicity, and language over thousands of years of history.

However, this strong religious connection and internality are easily excluded because of their strong ability to resist assimilation, which makes Jews lack a sense of identity with their local people and local culture, and in addition, strong religious ties inevitably lead to a great reduction in tolerance with other cultures.

Therefore, Jews always appear as "foreigners living in the locality", and to put it bluntly, they are not social, and they are naturally prone to arouse disgust, suspicion, and hostility.

2. Jews are prone to exclusion from occupations and bad impressions

Because of the lack of their own land, the majority of Jews engaged in commerce, in ancient times merchants were a profession that was criticized, and the strong mobility of the Jews to talk to the monks and the temple increased the suspicion of "profiteers", therefore, in ancient times when the business environment was bad, the Jews who mainly engaged in business were naturally vulnerable to all kinds of accusations, and this phenomenon was not uncommon in the literature of various countries.

3. The ability of Jews to occupy large amounts of resources can easily lead to hostility

Business is the Jewish tradition, education is another, and the huddle is another, and the combination of these three traditions is particularly apt to occupy a large amount of social resources. Locals are very suspicious of Jewish identity and loyalty, and are naturally more likely to become hostile to this kind of resource-hogging behavior.

Imagine that if the foreigners with a very small population control all kinds of resources and enjoy all kinds of privileges, the Juche nation will naturally be filled with a sense of humiliation, and a very practical example is the mobilization role played by the slogan of expelling the Tatars and restoring China.

Not only Jews, but also any ethnic minority occupying resources that do not match their own population ratio is likely to attract the exclusion of the main ethnic group, as is the case with overseas Chinese, and the same is true for Jews.