Ask a question that is both scientific and philosophical

The universe was originally a vacuum of nothing. In this case, the time is zero (the positive and negative imaginary times cancel each other out and appear as zero state time); The space is zero (the positive and negative virtual spaces cancel each other out and appear as a zero space); Matter is zero (neither positive nor negative particles are produced); There is zero energy (but there is infinite positive energy and infinite negative energy in it); The information is zero (contains all positive and negative information, but the external appearance is chaotic and informationless); Mental zero (in this case the unconscious state, "unintentionally true"). At this time, it is "Dao", "Wuji", "Zero", "Empty", and "Vacuum".

Due to the breaking of positive and negative symmetry in the vacuum, that is, the "breaking of symmetry" in physics, the universe began to give birth to an imaginary point (also known as the "cosmic singularity" of the big ** cosmology). At this time, it is in the state of "Tao gives birth to one", "Wuji gives birth to Taiji", and "emptiness". ”

The upstairs two paragraphs are good, I continued.

When the first three seconds of the universe are called "unknown universe" by scientists, the changes in those three seconds are unknown, and then there are neutrons and electrons.

The pre-universe does not meet the physical definition, and the current physical definition is only applicable after the universe is relatively stable.

From a physical point of view, the universe was originally a vacuum with nothing. In this case, the time is zero (the positive and negative imaginary times cancel each other out and appear as zero state time); The space is zero (the positive and negative virtual spaces cancel each other out and appear as a zero space); Matter is zero (neither positive nor negative particles are produced); There is zero energy (but there is infinite positive energy and infinite negative energy in it); The information is zero (contains all positive and negative information, but the external appearance is chaotic and informationless); Mental zero (in this case the unconscious state, "unintentionally true"). At this time, it is "Dao", "Wuji", "Zero", "Empty", and "Vacuum".

Due to the breaking of positive and negative symmetry in the vacuum, that is, the "breaking of symmetry" in physics, the universe began to give birth to an imaginary point (also known as the "cosmic singularity" of the big ** cosmology). At this time, it is in the state of "Tao gives birth to one", "Wuji gives birth to Taiji", and "emptiness".

It's a very esoteric thing, even if Hawking can't answer it well, the landlord is a "heavenly question".

According to the concept of the universe in Chinese philosophy, "Tao begets one, one begets two, two begets three, and three begets all things".

Of course, philosophy is not a science above science.

1 big ** is just an inference, and there is no conclusive evidence to prove the existence of big **.

2 Now when physics talks about big **, it will avoid the time and space before the big **, that is, the big ** did not exist before, or cannot be speculated, which is a way to retreat to the second.

3. In fact, your question is the most fundamental question of philosophy--- the question of origin. How did it all come about? It is difficult to have a fixed answer to this kind of question, and there are many differences between idealism and materialism.

Although I am a staunch materialist, I still tend to be idealistic in the face of the big **, and the things before the big ** are left to God to think, and that is not a matter of human thinking.

I can give you a small example, for example, our world is actually a virtual world simulated by a computer, but we don't know, we keep exploring the origin problem, then the last knowledge we can get is - when a person who created the virtual world (equivalent to God) pressed enter, the world was created, but what is the source of this person (God) who pressed enter? That's not something we can think about, let's let him think for himself.

There is no end to this question. s.Weinberg's "The First Three Minutes of the Universe" already says it well. Of course, the creation of the universe can hardly be said to be a normative scientific problem, and cosmology has yet to become a conventional science.

I don't know, this question is only conjecture at the moment.

You can check out "Arrow of Time", "God and the New Physics", "The Loss of Mathematical Certainty".

Space is the chicken, and time is the egg, and the reverse can be.

This question sounds familiar, but can it be asked like this: is it the chicken that came first or the egg that came first?

Your writing is good, but I'm more pragmatic

Matter is produced from nothingness, due to a variety of factors such as temperature, light, water, lightning, lightning to produce a variety of elements that make up matter, and due to the decrease in temperature, many reactions occur, there are many extracurricular books, I will not express too much.

Dizzy. It's a bit complicated. Whether it is infinite theism or the theory of the universe, it is difficult to explain. Maybe it has something to do with the theory of relativity. 3-dimensional spaces can be interchangeable by 4-dimensional spaces. Then so is the universe.

Formation of the universe: The universe is formed by the collision of two other universes, the two universes are destroyed and collapsed, and then expand to form one universe (two large) until it collides with another universe.

The whole universe exploded from a singularity, and the singularity was a chance of space and time.

The whole process is a ring, the formation of the universe is actually just an artificial definition, like defining a point from a certain ring as a starting point, but in fact, the generation and development of the universe is not consistent, imagine that if you start from a certain point on the earth and go on, the ideal state is to return to the starting point, so is the starting point the starting point or the end?

Everything in the world has a reason.

The same is true of people.

Man is conscious and comes from nature. Then we humans should be a part of nature. The meaning of the part is that it cannot be transcended by the whole. Then, the highest state of man is also the realm of nature.

The reason why people are human is because they are too far away from the realm of nature, and even have too many naïve ideas.

It is the destiny of nature to live, but it is also the destiny of oneself.

No one may know why people live. But who can say that there is an essential difference between life and death. Life and death have the same root, but the world is good at life and evil at death.

All these are rational numbers between heaven and earth. As long as we follow the laws of nature to survive, that is our purpose.

There may be a consciousness more powerful than nature, but this is unknown. If it really exists, then our natural consciousness is also controlled by it, and the meaning of our existence is also fixed by it.

At the end of the day, we are small and we need to submit ourselves to the arrangements of the greater consciousness in order to allow our consciousness to grow and grow beyond ...

We are like a cell in the human body, or even just something infinitely smaller than a cell. We must obey the higher, to the tissues, to the organs, to the individual, and then ... We must do this, otherwise all consciousness will be wiped out, as if it were the end of a life.

Think about the question, there is so much about science, such as where do people come from?