If you are using the Panasonic FX38 and Sony T700, please tell us about their advantages and disadva

I just bought Sony T700 two days ago,Very good,Panasonic doesn't understand,But I don't think Sony's appearance has to say,This touch screen is also very comfortable,Unlike T77It's soft,And built-in4G memory,Storage**More than 2000 no problem,Wide-angle zoom,Smiley shutter or something is very easy to use,The color of the light is also very positive,Very bright。 There are also many scene settings, and there is no blur in the scenery in the car. What's more amusing is its graffiti function.

Haha, I'm still very satisfied!

Sony's good Because Sony is also better than Panasonic after all.

FX38 is recommended

Panasonic camera function is practical but not fancy, the FX38 wide-angle end is better than W290 Image processing IC is better than Sony's contemporaneous products Extremely excellent battery performance **Reasonable (Panasonic DC's cost performance is the highest among Japanese brands, all made in Japan and products of the same grade ** are lower than other brands, thanks to Panasonic's world's first manufacturing scale, the cost is naturally lower than other manufacturers).

Sony's SLR cameras currently have a high cost performance, but in the DC field, they blindly pursue a fashionable and thin appearance, and the typical products sacrifice image quality for appearance! And there is no technical advantage!

Wow, the 2nd floor actually said that Sony is more cost-effective than Panasonic Is it too much to drink Sanlu Panasonic FX series is the main series, and it is accurately positioned in the same level as Sony's T series The original Lycra lens is wide-angle Quite good.

Panasonic FX520 has a wide angle of 25 mm, with a full manual function, tens of millions of pixels, a 3-inch large screen, and the operation mode of touch and button want to be combined, which is very good, especially the black version, and the appearance is also very beautiful.

Canon cards, which have always been difficult to use, are not humane, and are not recommended.

Sony's camera is good-looking, but toy-like.

Panasonic is a home appliance company, with a humanized system, and Leica lenses ensure the best quality. I have a 180 myself, and I recommended a few friends to buy it, and we all think that 180 is very easy to use, but it's a pity that there is no manual **.

Each has its own advantages! The difference between the two is 500 yuan.

The advantage of the FX38 is the wide angle, the super wide angle of 25mm. Whereas, the FX180 is a wide angle of 28mm.

The advantage of the FX180 is imaging, and the CCD is larger. The imaging is relatively better. The CCD of the FX180 is 1, while the FX38 is 1.

Depending on which aspect you focus on, the cost performance is about the same.

If it were me, I would choose to image better. fx180.

Upstairs is right, pixels can only reflect the advantage of high pixels when washing large photos,If you play back on the computer or TV,There are eight million pixels can be on the 42-inch TV**,The key is that FX180CCD size is relatively large,That is to say, the photosensitive area is large,So the phase quality will be relatively high,The bad point will be smaller

Also, FX38 seems to be offline, right? Anyway, I can't seem to buy it in Harbin But the wide angle and intersection of the FX38 are larger than the FX180, but then again, taking a step back is the wide angle, and the further is the transformation, you can feel it with the camera yourself, and the wide angle is bigger, and the change is narrower, at least that's how I feel The wide angle is only a little useful when taking a large range of close-up photos, and the FX180 is not without a wide angle

So overall, I recommend the FX180

FX18O is definitely better than FX38, not because of the height of the pixels, the pixels determine the size of the picture, not the image quality.

The CCD of the FX180 is 1 inch, which is larger than the 1 of the FX38, so the FX180 is better in terms of image quality.

Choose FX180.

Licensed around 2200. 1700 or 1800 for Hong Kong goods

I'm using FX180,On the picture quality is definitely stronger than FX38,Although the CCD with 1470W pixels is a bit difficult,But the advantage of CCD is not covered after all。

FX180 may not be offline, but it is difficult to buy licensed goods, and there are many swiping machines on the market, so you must be able to identify them. The first machine I got was one that I later recognized and replaced with JS. If you buy licensed goods with tickets, it is generally not too low to be lower than 2200, and you should pay attention if it is too low.

Sony T900 is periscope, good workmanship, delicate and very convenient to carry and use, but the picture quality is definitely not as good as Panasonic FX38, the periscope image quality is not as good as the telescopic type, congenital insufficiency.

It's all about the same, it's the same, the card machine is not comparable, I've used these two cameras, relatively speaking, Sony's picture is warm, it's a little yellow, and Panasonic has a lot of noise in the dark, that is, there are a lot of color noise. In terms of appearance, Sony is a little better. Panasonic's pixels may be a little higher, but the warranty is not as good as Sony's.

It is recommended to ask for a machine invoice when buying a camera, and do not write a handwritten cut invoice, as the warranty is easy to deviate.

The T900 is quite powerful, but I prefer the T700 to be more beautiful than the T900.

On the first floor, there is a cow man.

He told you all the details of the data.

I've used both, Samsung's friend's, Sony's, family's.

Personally, I feel that the ** Samsung that comes out of the photo is not very good.

The Sony screen is big and fashionable, and the photo is also average, after all, it is not a SLR.

But it's a little stronger than Samsung.

So I still recommend you to buy Sony.

Let's take a look at Panasonic's FX38, which has a beautiful appearance and super performance.

Sony T700, Samsung's camera (** quality) is very poor, Samsung is okay to make a mobile phone!

NV100 is much better, the wide angle is large, the aperture is large, and the video recording is good!

To be honest, Sony users make people feel comfortable, and those who use Nikon Samsung feel very uncomfortable and troublesome, and I basically buy Sony when I buy things, and Sony is only doing Walkman now, and the others are absolutely no 1 !!