What is the tradition of Western literary theory? The main similarities and differences between Chin

First structuralist essays, overview. Western structuralist literary theory is an integral part of the structuralist trend of thought that prevailed in the West in the sixties and seventies of the 20th century, and the structuralist trend of thought reached its peak in France in the sixties of the twentieth century.

1 The Chinese cultural tradition pursues the realm of "the unity of heaven and man", that is, the integration of man and object, so as to achieve the level of no self and no object; The Western cultural tradition is ,.. through the observation and analysis of nature

Summary. Analyze innovation and inheritance from the perspective of Western literary theory.

Sent to you in ** form.

Thank you. You are welcome.

Western literary theory refers to the fact that literary theories in Europe and the Americas are wrong.

Western literary theory is the history of the development of the West's understanding of literary and artistic phenomena and laws, which is different from the history of Western philosophy, aesthetics and literary criticism, and takes the development and evolution of Western literary theory as a historical clue to systematically introduce and analyze various major theories from ancient Greece to the 20th century.

Literary theorists who have appeared since ancient Greece, such as Plato, Aristotle, Horace, and Longinus in ancient Greece and Rome, and Bois, Lessing, Danner, Belinsky, etc., in modern times, as well as a large number of writers and poets, constitute the development of Western literary and artistic theory, and their literary and artistic theoretical works are the objects of research on the history of Western literary and artistic theory.

Taking the development and evolution of Western literary theories as historical clues, Western literary theory systematically introduces and analyzes various major theories from ancient Greece to the 20th century, and sorts out the basic concepts and their different forms, so as to help students summarize the experience and laws of Western literary theory, explore possible universal problems, and grasp the inner spirit of Western culture more deeply, so as to establish a necessary foundation and reference for further academic thinking.

The disciplines that study literature are usually referred to as literary sciences or literary studies. It includes three branches, namely literary theory, literary criticism, and literary history. Literature and art include literature and art in a broad sense and literature and art in a narrow sense, the above is a broad sense of literature and art, and the narrow sense of literature and art mainly refers to literary theory.

Literary theory is one of the three major sub-disciplines of literary studies (literary history, literary criticism, and literary theory).

Similarities and differences between Chinese and Western literature:

1 The Chinese cultural tradition pursues the realm of "the unity of heaven and man", that is, the integration of man and object, so as to achieve the level of no self and no object; The Western cultural tradition is to achieve the purpose of controlling nature through the observation and analysis of nature, which is used by us. Doubtfire conjecture: The realm of Chinese culture is indeed relatively high.

Or the pursuit (ideal) of the Chinese is relatively high.

2. In order to achieve the supreme state respected by Chinese culture, its load form is usually a relatively soft "qin, chess, calligraphy and painting". and other "elegant" techniques. and rejects the science and technology that has been applied to the world to transform nature.

3. At the same time, it is precisely because the goal set by Chinese culture is too high (in other words, unrealistic) that it is too difficult to achieve this goal, and it is difficult for ordinary people, and even the elites of the Chinese nation, to achieve it. As a result, in such a soil, although "the son is silent and the strange power is confused", the whole nation has an unusual enthusiasm for "special functions".

1. Different modes of thinking China: The mode of thinking is macroscopic, so that Chinese can better grasp the overall situation, and the Chinese side generally pays more attention to Confucianism, pays attention to etiquette and shame, compares the subtlety of key socks in ordinary times, and pays more attention to etiquette when thinking about problems. The West:

Being good at microscopic thinking and rigorous thinking is due to the microscopic mode of thinking, which also makes the West enter the scientific society earlier. Generally advocating open-mindedness, the way of thinking is very direct, and the way of thinking is more focused on some interests and a little individualistic. 2. The scientific culture between China and the West presents a different background of civilization, and the scientific culture was born in the West.

In the ancient Greek period, the freedmen's pursuit of pure knowledge and the "useless use of destroying the hailstone" cultivated and shaped the curiosity and rational tradition of the best natural secrets in Western culture. The establishment, development and perfection of metaphysics have provided useful thinking training for the further pursuit of establishing a rigorous and self-consistent logical system.

You can go and take a look at the other ** sample texts written above. Hope it helps.

The basic differences between Chinese and American cultures.

Personal concept. CD: Collectivism: In general, Chinese and other Asian cultures reflect an orientation that social scientists call "collectivism." These cultures are more focused on group cooperation and individual modesty.

Beauty: Individualism: On the contrary, Americans generally exhibit an individualistic orientation. Self-actualization, if not a disruptive expectation, is at least more acceptable. Americans place more emphasis on "freedom" that is not subject to external constraints.

Social. Chinese social relations are more formal and hierarchical. Chinese seem to be very accustomed to hierarchical structures, often determining how they behave according to their position and conventions.

Americans, on the other hand, are more focused on informal and egalitarian relationships. Americans are usually most comfortable with people of the same social status; They don't pay much attention to social hierarchy.

Friendship. Compared to Americans, Chinese are more likely to have a small number of lifelong friends who have deep friendships with each other and are willing to provide any form of help to each other.

Americans may have many friends and acquaintances who change over time and have limited obligations to each other.

Obligation. Among Chinese, relationships with others often mean obligations to each other.

In contrast, Americans tend to shy away from redundant or interdependent relationships and situations that can lead to long-term obligations.

Orientation. Chinese focus on a relational orientation. Maintaining a harmonious relationship is more important than completing tasks.

In contrast, Americans focus on a task orientation, and getting the job done is often more important than relationships.

Harmony and face.

Chinese are generally taught to avoid direct conflict, public criticism, and controversial topics. They want to maintain harmony among the people around them and save "face" for others.

Instead, Americans are generally willing to confront issues directly, offer criticism, discuss controversial issues, and stick to what they consider to be "factual." They don't care about "face".

Relationships & Rules.

When it comes to interactions, Chinese generally trust interpersonal relationships more than written rules and procedures.

Americans, on the other hand, generally believe that written rules apply to everyone and produce fair and reasonable procedures and decisions.

The concept of time. Chinese are more nostalgic and future-oriented.

Americans are usually not very interested in the past, they focus on the current situation.

Status. In Chinese tradition, an individual's position in society is largely determined by inherited characteristics, such as age, gender, and family, but this is changing.

For most Americans, personal status is based primarily on one's accomplishments, including education and career success.

This thing, it's too time-consuming to write. I'll just give you some ideas.

Let's analyze how to deal with Western culture.

There are two main ideas: one is how Western culture is produced (the emergence of any culture has its conditions, and these conditions determine the attributes of these cultures); The other is the impact on our current lives (the so-called impact is simply to evaluate the good or bad for us, and this can be put forward by yourself). These two factors are what determine how we should treat Western culture.

Concrete 1, first of all, what are the specifics of Western culture, and what are you going to talk about. (e.g., Renaissance culture, Enlightenment, etc.).

2. Secondly, you have selected what you want to say (a certain or a certain period of Western culture), analyze and analyze, and talk about the content that this culture wants to express. What still affects us today compared to that time.

3. Finally, combined with the current situation, what has been affected by this culture and what has not been affected by this culture. Whether it's good or bad

Basically, the structure of this ** comes out.

The third prize of the Korean style gray space recommended by the country and everyone.