The plagiarism incident of the Flower Band, where is the main plagiarized track similar?

Be.. I love this Japanese girl group so much!

The end of the "Gao Jin Evidence of Plagiarism" incident: Why is the plagiarism phenomenon in the music world getting more and more serious?

It's true, but they apologize.

Resolutely resist and combat plagiarism. In fact, not only the **circle, such as the **circle, **circle, such a phenomenon is very common, if everyone to plagiarize the original to obtain their own benefits, then the original will only become less and less in the future, so we must resolutely maintain the originality and resist the fight against plagiarism. If my work is stolen by someone else, I will definitely defend my rights and go through legal procedures to let plagiarists know that plagiarism is not taken for granted, but has a price.

Regardless of the plagiarism time of the ** circle, even the film and television industry has all kinds of plagiarism incidents. Well,**Plagiarism time in the circle, I think, well, how to say it, good**Everyone wants to imitate, but if the degree of imitation is too high, it will make people feel very bored. Why don't you work hard to conceive your own ideas and apply your own ideas to the **?

Plagiarism from others can only plagiarize the melody, but not the soul of the author. Therefore, it is necessary to express one's soul and one's own thoughts. If you blindly plagiarize others, you will lose yourself over time.

If you lose yourself on the road of **, then you will no longer have your own future. There was one plagiarism, and now, well, the elimination rate is too high. Slowly you will be eliminated, even if you are in the dormitory, others will not, you will look at you with colored eyes.

Plagiarism is undoubtedly absolutely incorrect, not only violating the professional ethics that a person should have, but also infringing on the intellectual property rights of the original author, which really shouldn't.

But we should still look at plagiarism rationally, why do these ** people plagiarize so without hesitation? I think it's not just that it's difficult to create originally, it's that these people are opportunistic and have low professional ethics, and they want to get something for nothing. Therefore, plagiarism should be severely cracked down, and as a ** person, we should abide by professional ethics.

In fact, this kind of plagiarism incident is very infuriating. It's also hard to accept. This kind of behaviour should be combated.

When you're working really hard to finish something. only to find that it was plagiarized by people who did not work hard. Now it's time to make some gains. It must be an unacceptable fact.

In fact, this phenomenon is not only in the ** circle. You have this phenomenon in other fields as well. This kind of behavior is actually very bad. It is not conducive to the protection of intellectual property rights. It is also not conducive to the development of innovation. Therefore, it must be eliminated as much as possible.

It's about letting yourself rely on your own efforts to succeed. Not only in this circle, but also in other places. Instead of cultivating this bad habit of getting something for nothing.

Celebrities like these should pay more attention. In itself, it seems to have the role of a role model. It should play a good leading role.

Plagiarism is more appropriate if it is replaced by borrowing, and now if there is a new idea, it will be constantly borrowed and plagiarized, although this behavior makes many people feel disgusted and shameful, but innovative new things are often perfected in continuous borrowing and plagiarism, so I have no objection.

Now many new-generation ** stars are relying on the support of personality, and few people will create seriously**, because it is slow and hard to make money. So the main focus is on maintaining the character design, as for the ** can plagiarize, I will never create my own.

The brokerage company behind it in his spare time will let him take more advertising, endorsements, commercial performances or something, and he will have to make more money anyway. Anyway, they have good looks and good figures, and many sisters-in-law just like them, but they can't do anything just by looking at their appearance.

As for those good creators, they don't have an advantage in this era of looking at their appearance. The young people were attracted by the little fresh meat next door. Only those who really like to listen to ** listen to these people's songs, but there are very few of these people. The real creators are not very good at hype.

With the previous ** singers getting older and slower in creation, they finally released a song and was plagiarized by the new generation of little fresh meat singers next door, and brain-dead fans are still very supportive. So plagiarism is increasing.

"** infringement" seems to be unreliable, and the judge's judgment based on the opinions of all parties has become the decisive basis. In this regard, I believe that many of the criteria for judging infringement of film and television works are very vague. As for how to put an end to similar infringement cases, the lawyer believes that in the case of imperfect relevant laws, the only way to carry out industry self-discipline is to carry out industry self-discipline, "The eyes of the masses are bright, if your work is indeed plagiarized, then even if the law does not convict you, your ** work will be spurned by fans, what good is it for you?"

Only by doing one's own things in a down-to-earth manner can there be a market, and the world can be truly 'quiet'. ”

In the ** circle, the "8 subsections are similar" is also used as the criterion for judging whether the ** work is plagiarized. The lawyer made it clear that there is no relevant copyright law in China, and the copyright laws are all under the "Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China", and there is no relevant law similar to "8 subsections of similarity is plagiarism" in the "Copyright Law". To put it bluntly, this depends to a certain extent on the judge's own understanding of **. ”

Plagiarism may not be something uncommon. And they are all common things, and they are things with a high incidence.

Borrowing from someone else's creations. Or pay homage to someone else's work. Actually, there is no big problem.

Mainly, still. ** Yu plagiarized someone else's work, and he still refuses to admit it. and also put on an innocent and pitiful look for himself, and also said that his hard work was said to be plagiarism by others.

This kind of ** person is really shameful.

Some people. He's not plagiarizing, he's making someone else's work, but he's brave enough to admit it. So this practice will not be criticized by others.

There is also plagiarism in life. It's just that after you plagiarize, you have to have the courage to admit it, whether you pay tribute to other people's works or draw inspiration from other people's works. But you can't always say it's your own creation.

It is not strange for all kinds of plagiarism in the ** circle, on the one hand, people's inspiration is limited, many creators themselves are unable to get rid of imitation, and the initial stage of creation is imitation, it is difficult to break through, and some are lacking talent but love to create; On the other hand, attracted by profits, fame, etc., many people will involuntarily seek profit and quick success, and will be lucky about people's ability to appreciate it. In short, the only way to stop the wind of plagiarism is to re-cure. It can only be avoided by letting the people who have gained it due to plagiarism suffer the pain of loss.

I think plagiarism may not be avoided for the time being.

First, **** is in life, and people's lives may be mostly similar, so the ** that expresses joy, anger and sorrow may also be similar.

Second, as a **person, he must have heard a lot**, those melodies will be in his mind, and when he composes, those melodies will pop out, so that it is inevitable that other people's melodies may be used. When inspiration runs out, it is also necessary to learn from other people's works, and borrow and borrow, which leads to the occurrence of plagiarism.

Third, the copyright awareness of ** is not very strong now, and the cost of plagiarism is too low.

Fourth, the information is not equal, some people plagiarize foreign ** works, and the domestic audience does not know about it for a short time, and the foreign original author does not know that it has been plagiarized.

It should be said that there are very few people who really blatantly plagiarize. From what I have observed, the following scenarios deserve further consideration. 1.

The current ** reference annotation guidelines have only started in recent years. Tradition** was not marked as it is now, even if there were references, and Du Yaxiong even defended tradition by arguing that there was no need for "norms". Of course, it is quite normal that there were no references in the previous **.

Some older authors have even become accustomed to not using references. Some are very confident, such as a certain expert once publicly said that he never refers to others when writing articles. He said this to emphasize that he was writing his own words.

I myself published articles in some ** education journals, originally I had references when I submitted them, but they were not published because the journal did not want references. This incident has always made me have no confidence to say that others plagiarize, because I can't argue with anyone who wants to be serious. Journals like this that don't require references still exist today.

3.Many people's reading habits are not questioning. Always accustomed to reading like a textbook.

Textbooks are public knowledge, and they don't need to be noted even if they are written into articles, but ** not. I have encountered such a case, a contributor's article was tested by the software and the repetition rate was 90%, so the author shouted to me that he thought his article was written by himself, how could it be plagiarism? This phenomenon is due to the fact that some authors' usual reading habits are "textbook-style", because your mind is filled with other people's things, so even if you write it yourself, it is possible to repeat it and exceed the standard.

There are many cases like this. 4.Caused by writing habits.

Many authors speak clichés, jargon, and just don't say their own words, so there are more opportunities for repetition. When others accused him of the difficulty of reading his articles, he proudly defended that because his articles were so personal, he could not copy them even if others wanted to. 5.

At the beginning of the 20th century, even the rules and regulations of China's schools were transplanted from others, let alone transplanted theories. At that time, the transplant theory was called "introduction", but now it is plagiarism if it is not "indicated". In this regard, there may be some people who still can't turn the corner.

Recently, domestic ** has frequently exposed plagiarism incidents, it can be said that it is a popular song, and it was picked up soon after the plagiarism problem, I am not a person in the ** circle and I don't want to make too many comments, after all, the factual evidence is there, and the rest is the business of their insiders.

Of course, another thing is the release of Avengers 4, in addition to the high box office, all kinds of gun versions also continue to appear in our circle of friends and space.

These two things seem to be unrelated, but they both reflect the problem of copyright awareness and protection in China, which is a relatively big issue, and I can only briefly talk about it in a small part. In fact, there is also a copyright law in China, but in the field of culture, it is indeed a very difficult thing to do, because this plagiarism and imitation is very difficult to identify, I will give a simple example, that is, Qiong Yao and Yu Zheng, in fact, Yu Zheng's plagiarism of Qiong Yao is a very obvious thing, and even the name is directly copied, but this is how the lawsuit between the two has been fought for so many years, although Yu Zheng lost the lawsuit, but he did not lose the mass market, not to mention those who have not been sued or withdrawn from the lawsuit.

To this day, we can still see this kind of plagiarism people active in front of and behind the scenes, a little earlier Yu Zheng, recent such as flower porridge and the like, in China, these things can be said to be impossible to explain, relying on plagiarism fame and fortune is a common thing, and those original people have a lot of "unscrupulous". For example, just like some marketing accounts, the content is all copied, and just modifying the keywords becomes an original article, and the number of reads may be higher than the hard-working article.

In fact, in China, people's awareness of copyright is not high, and most of them don't care about plagiarism, and the reason why people go back to condemn some plagiarists is nothing more than that they are unhappy that those plagiarists make a lot of money. Just like when we were students, we were unhappy about cheating on exams and getting good grades, not cheating on exams itself.

And when someone is accused of plagiarism, there will always be someone who comes out to wash the floor. Personally, I think it's normal, because these don't need to pay any substantial price, that is, the so-called standing and talking without backache, the water army washing the floor and shameless, black and white do not distinguish between right and wrong.

But someone always has to pay for plagiarism, who is it? Original workers, and all original workers. Under the nest, there will be no eggs, just like a series of chain effects caused by Han Xue's lip-syncing, this is the truth.

The main purpose of copyright protection is to protect China's cultural industry, most people may think of the success of American Hollywood blockbusters, whether you want to admit the success of the American cultural industry, the American cultural industry, can be said to be flooding the global market. The cultural soft power formed by the developed cultural industry of the United States has made the United States have strong international competitiveness, but the cultural competitiveness formed by China's 5,000-year-old history and culture is not as good as that of the United States, which has a history of only a few hundred years.

If you are serious, plagiarism is a criminal incident, and if you say it seriously, it should be prohibited. But the creation of art is really not something that can be judged by plagiarism. For example, who copied calculus, which Newton and Leibniz invented at the same time.

So, if you have the ability, we use speed so that those plagiarists can never catch up with you, so that they can only be daunted, life is very short, we are all running, then there is time to see this kind of plagiarism. But for malicious plagiarism, the law has restricted his downline, so sometimes pick up the law ** to solve it, indicating that you are not a soft persimmon either. Hope that helps.