Nikon Lens Selection 90, Nikon Lens Selection

If you only buy one lens, the first choice is 18105, the focal length is very good, and the imaging is said to be in the past, with image stabilization. The 1870 has no stabilization, and the focal length is one piece shorter. The 55200 is a medium telephoto lens, so there are not many opportunities to use it, but if you have a standard zoom lens, I still recommend this, the imaging is good.

The 18-70 one is recommended, compared to the 55-200 lacks the wide-angle end, and the 200-end has vignetting; Let's understand it as an extension head of 18-55. And 18-105 is a pullover, cost-effective is a dog's head but not actually a dog, but its imaging quality is definitely not as good as 18-70.

The image quality of the 18-70 will definitely surprise you, and it's a great value for money!

It is recommended to choose 18-105, which is a very suitable lens for novices. Especially when traveling, it can take into account the big scene, and when there is a slight distance and can not be close to the shooting, the appropriate telescope can take in the better effect**. And it also reduces the time to change lenses, you must know that when you travel, time is money, and the time to shoot well is often fleeting.

goodluck

If you specialize in shooting landscapes, you don't use a focal length of 55-200, because the main focus of landscape shooting is between 12-30, and the 18-segment deformation of 18-70 is more obvious, and there is no VR, (you don't want to run around the world with a tripod) and you don't have a fuselage motor, so there is only one option left: 18-105VR. In fact, the whole is subject to your body, otherwise there are still many good choices and collocations. If you haven't started yet, you might as well add some money to buy a 450d or 500d set, which is not too much money.

I have a small aperture of 18-70 is okay, but a large aperture is not. The 18-105 large aperture and the small aperture are the same, and the overall imaging is okay. **Cheaper than 18-70.

It is advisable to choose the latter. Adaptation is the key, and you should be a novice depending on your appearance. You can't go wrong with that.

Later there was money in the whole telephoto and header.

What are you talking about on the first floor? The 18-70 is definitely a good value for money head, the imaging is much stronger than the 18-105, I'm now the 18-70 70-300 Sigma with macro.

The fuselage does not have a motor, it is 18-70 plus 50 fixed focus, and the most suitable for scenery and characters is the head of 16-85, which is too expensive, and you can buy another d3000.

First of all, you can go to 18-70, and that lens will be better-made, and the imaging will not even catch up with 18-105, and the convenience is not as good as 18-105.

The 55-200 is also a generally useless lens, and it is not very useful.

In fact, an 18-105 can do most things. 18-70+55-200** is not cheap, this set is not easy to use, it is better to match 18-105+50 to save money and use.

Basically, your requirements, 18-105+50 can be realized, and it is a very reasonable configuration.

Go and look at the fuselage If you have a fuselage without a motor 18-70 70-300 (not the kind of manual focus) +35mm If you have a motor Or a 16-85 is expensive to use than 18-70 and you don't need to change it in the future Ultra-wide-angle shooting scenery is called a cow.

18-105 The first focal length is sufficient Second, avoid changing lenses Nikon's lenses As soon as there is dust on the mount, it is easy to mismatch the data of the machine.

You can buy 18-105 lenses, so you don't have to change lenses.