Is it a good way to learn history and copy books?

You're lucky, hehe, I'm good at geography, and I've been in the top few in the city.

For geography, you must first be familiar with the map, which is very important, to use the map to memorize, such as the location of the city, the surrounding minerals, the railways that connect it, to be familiar with the isotherms in physical geography, to climb the precipitation line, to see how they relate to other geographical things, to remember the things on the map that do not exist according to the normal geographical laws, such as the climate types of the East African plateau, and the map to look at every day!

Be serious about the teacher's lessons, as long as you haven't heard or don't understand, remember and expand this knowledge point, and fully understand it, even outside of class! Because geography exams are often tested in real places, this requires your knowledge.

The key is to look at the picture and listen to the teacher explain and understand!! Geography is a bit of a science subject.

You can abbreviate the words in the book and memorize them in short, easy-to-remember sentences, and then you can copy them after you have adapted them in your own words. For example, the background, the process, the meaning, these big knowledge points, as for those small knowledge points, it is good to read the book often, and you have to ask the teacher if your adaptation is good, whether you have lost the knowledge points.

Small knowledge points should be read often Big knowledge points are generally read or copied a few days before the exam Learn history not just in books You should watch extracurricular programs or books (if you are not interested, then I am beautiful) You should sort out historical events by yourself Ancient history is divided into cultural history.

The history of ethnic relations, the history of diplomacy, the history of the centralized system, the history of people, and so on; the history of foreign countries, the history of sorting out countries, and the history of international relations; modern history, that is, the formation of China's semi-colonial and semi-feudal society, and the exploration of our people, among which the development of national capitalism in China is the leading factor (including the economic system, etc.).

That's it, give it a try.

Memorize more, you must memorize it well, copying books is not very useful, just read the book well.

Do more questions, in addition to the question and answer questions, you should also practice, don't look directly at the answers, and memorize the questions you have done, pay attention to understanding, and there is no big problem if you understand it.

It's better to copy a book than to memorize ......it directly

No. I am a recent senior in high school. When we study history, we need to turn history into stories and tell them to everyone.

In this way, a system is formed, and you naturally sort it out. Don't memorize, understand. Say more, talk more.

Having time to read some extracurricular history books is definitely good for learning history.

Recently, I have always seen articles on the headlines such as copying books and punching in, copying books to make money.

Some netizens said: Copying books is a pit, and if you have the kung fu to copy books, it is better to read more books, or find a job to do a good job.

Some netizens said: You can practice calligraphy by copying books! And we won't do anything else, copying books to make money and then making headlines, there's nothing wrong with that.

So, the copying activity was a variety.

Some of the words are very uncomfortable for people to read, and some people just take a copy of the book and take a picture of it and send it to the micro headlines, you have to see what he copied, and you have to open it**, densely packed with a lot.

Naturally, I don't deny that there are still benefits to copying bad books. Because the ancients said that a good memory is better than a bad pen. There are classic sentences to copy down, or which article you like to copy down, and we've done it before.

But to make money by copying books, I haven't studied it yet, I don't know what kind of operation leakage can make money by copying books, and how much can I earn?

However, watching netizens say that copying books and punching in can increase fans. I don't know what will happen to such a fan if he doesn't copy the book?

I'm afraid it's not so easy to practice copying books and practicing words, if you want to practice words to draw red to copy, it should be better.

If you can memorize the book in your mind after copying it, it is naturally a gain, even if you can remember a little bit. But copying books is just to punch in and complete the task, I think it's better to read a few pages seriously, and reading aloud should be a little better than copying books!

Is it good to copy a book? The public says that the public is reasonable, and the mother-in-law says that the mother-in-law is reasonable, depending on what you want to have.

I don't know what you think about copying books?

For the six subjects of liberal arts, the comprehensive literature is the best way to improve the grades.

You have a lot of room for improvement.

The characteristics of liberal arts are that the literature is wide and chaotic, and my experience is this: the biggest difficulty in the discipline of history is that the amount of memorization is too large.

If you can't remember or memorize, it's hard to say how you can learn well, and Shen Min and people who are not interested in history want to do well in the exam, which is even more difficult.

If you're not interested, you can't remember, you can't even remember, how to understand, how to answer when you do the question.

Therefore, the key to learning history well is 1, interest, 2, strong memory, and 3, understanding.

The first two points are not cultivated overnight, and require a period of cultivation.

And if you solve the first two points, the third point will be solved naturally.

Suggestions: 1. Put a long line to catch a big fish, don't keep an eye on the progress and exams in front of you, your only exam is the college entrance examination or the high school entrance examination, make a plan for a few history books, memorize two sections of content every day, the content is less or you can increase the amount of learning if you have spare energy, and learning history is a process of slowly accumulating memory.

After one round, it will be the second and third rounds.

2. Don't pay attention to doing questions, to be honest, you don't need to write history homework, you don't remember it, and copying the answers is useless.

Put the time on your back.

Test scores don't depend on how many questions you do, but on how much you have in your head.

3. The school will definitely send you a lot of review materials, just one benefit, there must be a good classification of good knowledge points, take a look, and strive to remember.

The subject of political science is relatively simple, it requires little memorization, it is not difficult to memorize, and in addition, read more material analysis questions and master the answering skills.

Geography is very lively, but first you have to memorize it, but geography is more inductive and practical.

Suggestions: 1. Summarize and memorize knowledge by chapter, please refer to historical suggestion 1; 2. Make full use of the atlas to observe and memorize the regional geographic latitude and longitude location, topography, climate, urban transportation, resources and other elements in the corresponding chapters; 3. Do more regional analysis questions.

For mathematics, my method is to insist on making a paper every day with the infiltration, half a sheet is OK, mainly based on basic questions, especially difficult can be let go, do a type to ensure a type, there are many basic questions in the college entrance examination, and a few difficult ones will not be able to be about 100.

How to say Chinese and English, you also need to memorize the basic knowledge of the language, the fixed collocation of English phrases, etc.

I suggest that every time you read a book, you should look at each historical event as a story, and remember the people in the story, the time, the cause, the result, its impact on society and how we view the story today. I'm sure you're going to get a great deal.

To be precise, it is useless, the most important thing is that the teacher listens carefully in class and takes notes in time. Also, when reviewing, it's a good idea to read the key points several times. Usually flip through history books and read more things related to history, in fact, watching TV series is also a good way, after all, it can make your historical knowledge richer.

It is not advisable to copy books, it is recommended to make an induction table of the knowledge system by yourself, and summarize the knowledge points to read and memorize more. In fact, many of the answers to history questions can be found through materials, and multiple-choice questions depend on one's understanding and memory of knowledge points.

In fact, the history of listening to class is generally about seventy or eighty points, and it should be no problem to read the information given by the teacher twice more than 90 points... Copying may not be effective, the key is to listen to the lectures...

What should I do to copy a book, it's a waste of time, I memorize history like this, there is a chronology of events at the back of the book, which is not detailed enough, and then turn the book to make him incomplete, write the key points concisely, first sort out an idea, the bookstore has that kind of portable booklet, which is very useful, don't rush to memorize it first, read it two or three times first, and then memorize the key points, so it's much easier.

It is more laborious to make sure that you can, it is recommended not to do this, just read the book a few times, chemistry just remember the reaction formula, and it would be nice if you had time to watch more movies about it.

It's useless to copy books, so you usually have to read more history books, read more, and then connect the major events and characters of each period, which is easier to remember. You can also make a table, time, event, person. It's easy to remember.

I don't think it's useful I'm also a liberal arts . It is recommended to read the book several times and do more questions. You don't have to get all the questions right, but if you do it carefully, you will use impressions.

I read history books as extracurricular books, and that's what I did, and the history class representative resigned from me in seconds.

5 times is better for memorization and easier to accept, but it is better to focus on understanding, our teachers often say this.

It's useless, copying and copying your brain won't make memorization, and in the end it will become practicing words and filling paper.

It is not helpful, this kind of method with a lot of effort and unreliable results is recommended to be used sparingly.

There is no regard for history as **, and it is really very simple.

Personally, I don't think the effect is very big. It is recommended that you buy textbooks for memorizing knowledge points.

Read more books, read more times, and just talk to the teacher in class.

No, copying textbooks doesn't help except wasting pen and paper, and your hands are so sore that you can't recognize two or three words.

Dry copying is useless, it can be written by heart, understood and memorized, reviewed from time to time, and deeply understood.

It depends on whether you have memorized it after copying, whether you copy it or not, it is not helpful, and it still depends on yourself.