Both sides were fighting, both armed with sticks, one side was beaten, slightly injured, how to divi

Updated on society 2024-02-27
5 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    It's funny to divide the responsibilities after the appointment.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Legal Analysis:1It is likely that the act was guilty of assembling a crowd to fight. The crime of assembling a crowd to fight refers to the act of assembling a group of people to fight each other in a gang for the purpose of taking revenge on others, fighting for hegemony, or other improper purposes, thereby disrupting public order.

    2.The crime of assembling a crowd to fight mainly punishes the ringleaders and active participants. Where the crime of assembling a crowd to fight is committed, the ringleaders and other active participants are to be sentenced to up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention or controlled release; In any of the following circumstances, the ringleaders and others who actively participate are to be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years:

    Legal basis: Article 292 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China: Where a crowd is assembled to fight, the ringleaders and others who actively participate in it shall be sentenced to up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention or controlled release; In any of the following circumstances, the ringleaders and others who actively participate are to be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years:

    1) Gathering crowds to fight multiple times;

    2) Gathering a crowd to brawl with a large number of people, a large scale, and a vile social impact;

    3) Gathering crowds to fight in public places or on major traffic arteries, causing serious disruption of social order;

    4) Armed crowds to fight.

    Where a crowd is assembled to fight, causing serious injury or death, it is to be convicted and punished in accordance with the provisions of articles 234 and 232 of this Law.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Summary. Dear, I'm glad to answer your <>

    In the event of a fight, both parties may be held civilly, administratively or criminally liable. If one party suffers more than minor injuries, it constitutes a criminal offense and a case shall be filed and investigated; If you suffer minor injuries or less, it is a civil case, and the public security organ may issue a notice not to file the case.

    If one of the parties is beaten and does not fight back, does the person who was beaten need to be held responsible?

    Dear, I'm glad to answer your <>

    In the case of a contest, if a crowd brawl occurs, both parties may bear civil, administrative or criminal liability. If one party suffers more than minor injuries, it constitutes a criminal offense and a case should be filed for responsibility; If you suffer minor injuries or less, it is a civil case, and the public security organ may issue a notice not to file the case.

    Legal basis: Article 9 of the Law of the People's Republic of China on Public Security Administration Punishments and Chongchan Article 9 Where fights and brawls caused by civil disputes are relatively minor, and the parties reach an agreement and perform them through mediation by the public security organs, they shall not be punished. Accordingly, in the case where the circumstances of the fight are judged to be relatively minor, and after the case is discovered, the two parties reach an agreement not to pursue each other's responsibility, and the responsibility for public security violations may no longer be pursued.

    The two sides agreed, but I didn't move the opposite side to hold ** and slashed, more than 8 people, more than minor injuries, 6 of us but did not move.

    Crowd fights are suspected of being responsible, but if you don't do it, the person who laughs will basically not have much responsibility, and the injured party, the medical expenses are to be compensated by the beater.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Summary. Hello, that's right. If the victim does not retaliate, if he or she does not take the initiative to provoke, insult or attack the other party, and does not take retaliatory measures after being beaten, then the responsibility of the victim will usually be reduced or exempted when determining responsibility.

    However, if the victim also participates in acts such as provoking, insulting or attacking the other party, he or she still bears some responsibility. <>

    If one of the parties is beaten and does not fight back, does the person who was beaten need to be held responsible?

    Hello <>

    According to China's "Public Security Administration Punishment Law": No one may disturb the social order of public places with fights and other behaviors, and once discovered, he can be punished with administrative detention, fines and other punishments.

    Therefore, it is illegal to fight and fight in a public place, and both parties need to bear the corresponding responsibility.

    Hello, that's right. If the victim does not take the initiative to provoke, insult or attack the other party, and does not take retaliatory measures after being beaten, then the victim will usually be reduced or exempted from liability when determining responsibility. However, if the victim also participates in acts such as provoking, insulting or attacking the other party, he or she still bears some responsibility.

    When dealing with similar disputes, the judicial authorities will also take into account the specific circumstances and evidence of the case, such as the relationship between the two parties, whether there are other people intervening in the process, and other factors. Therefore, in practice, it is necessary to make a judgment based on a combination of various factors.

    At the same time, in order to avoid the occurrence of such disputes, we should pay attention to legal education and publicity, and enhance citizens' legal awareness and sense of social responsibility. [Flowers or Macros].

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    If the person who should have started the fight constitutes a slight injury or above, and the party who injured the person is not a legitimate act of defense, the party who should have injured the person with socks constitutes the crime of intentional injury, and whoever intentionally injures or assaults another person shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, short-term detention or controlled release and a corresponding fine. If you are beaten by the other party, you can choose to avoid or call the police for help, but if you beat the other party again, causing the situation to expand, both parties will bear the corresponding responsibility.

Related questions
44 answers2024-02-27

If a person is a person who attaches great importance to feelings, or has been meticulous to himself in the past. It's human nature that you can't forget, but when you're already in another relationship, I think you should distinguish between the two. There are some memories of life that cannot be erased for a lifetime! >>>More

5 answers2024-02-27

1.If you have sufficient evidence that the vehicle behind you hit you first, causing you to hit the vehicle in front of you, and you did not park illegally on the highway or otherwise violate the law, the vehicle behind will compensate you and the vehicle in front. >>>More

7 answers2024-02-27

If the content of the agreement does not violate the mandatory provisions of the state, it is valid.