Is the fate of the sages not dictated by numerology?

It's that they don't care about fate anymore, and they don't care about good or bad.

There must be, and it is impossible for a person with a bad fate to become a saint.

People are not sages, and what you do depends on yourself.

People think that the sage is first of all a human being, and if he is a human being, he cannot escape the master of life.

No one escapes God's sovereignty.

Ecclesiastes 3:1a There is a time for everything, and a time for everything under heaven.

Ecclesiastes 3:2 A time to be born and a time to die. There are times when it is planted, and there are times when it is plucked out of what is planted.

Ecclesiastes 3:3 There is a time to kill, and a time to heal. Sometimes it is demolished, sometimes it is built.

Ecclesiastes 3:4 A time to weep, a time to laugh. A time to mourn, a time to dance.

Ecclesiastes 3:5 A time to throw stones, and a time to gather stones. There is a time to embrace, and there is a time not to embrace.

Ecclesiastes 3:6 A time to seek, a time to lose. There is a time to be conservative, and a time to be abandoned.

Ecclesiastes 3:7 Sometimes it is torn, and sometimes it is sewn. There is a time for silence, and there is a time for words.

Ecclesiastes 3:8 A time to love and a time to hate. There is a time for war, and a time for reconciliation.

Ecclesiastes 3:9 So what profit does the worker do in his labor?

Ecclesiastes 3:10 And I saw that God had made the world labor, that they might be trained in it.

Ecclesiastes 3:11 God made all things, each for its own good, according to its time. and laid eternal life in the hearts of men. But what God has done from beginning to end cannot be understood by man.

No way. Numerology is the balance of yin and yang.

Don't forget, numerology is also created by people.

So, in fact, it is not numerology that controls people, but people who control themselves.

When did Confucius put forward the "Three Fears", anyway, it was not what he said about Confucianism when he was alive. When he says that he is afraid of adults, he will not be afraid of himself, nor will he think of himself as a saint. Then his fear was given to him by his predecessors.

In other words, there were many "words of destiny, lords, and saints" that he feared during his lifetime. It is Confucianism created by Confucius, so the "Mandate of Heaven, the words of the great man and the sage" that he fears is not "Confucianism", but what kind of learning by Beiyunqin. There is no problem with such a judgment.

In the next step, since the founder of Confucianism was afraid of the "Mandate of Heaven, the words of the great man and the sage" put forward by a certain kind of learning, then we cannot point the finger at Confucius's Confucianism by proposing a criticism of Confucius's "three fears". In other words, Confucius's "three fears" are not afraid of Confucianism, and if we want to deny Confucius, we should affirm these "three fears". This is the reason for saying, "We must support whatever the enemy opposes, and we must oppose whatever the enemy supports."

Confucius's fear is his opposition, and he is afraid because these contents pose a threat to his survival, and if he is not afraid, will it affect the formation of his theory, so he must be cautious in the face of these "mandates of heaven, the words of the great and the sages". What he opposes, we must support, and what we want to support is the "Mandate of Heaven, the Word of the Lord, and the Saints" that he fears. This is a logical reasoning, and this is a case in point.

Another way to put it is to take it literally, what is the opposite of "Mandate of Heaven"? Is it "human life", is it the "life" of a person, the "life" of a group of people or the "life" of a group of people, everyone does not obey the life given by nature, but has to obey the life given by some people, which choice is better? "Destiny" is the enlightenment of the laws of nature in the dark, and our advocacy of "harmonious society" and "sustainable development" is not in response to the hints that nature gives us?

What Westerners have created in the course of development is the inequality between people and people (those who get rich first have to occupy the resources of the unrich, and if they don't give them, they will fight), and it is the depletion of resources, which is the life that one type of person brings to another type of people. Is it right to respect these lives and not the "mandate of heaven"?