History Revealed Why no country in history has succeeded in annexing China

If the Mongols and Manchus practiced Islam, they would force the Han Chinese to follow Islam as well, otherwise they would be beheaded. In that case, Chinese culture will be completely destroyed. Historically, Afghans also believed in Buddhism, and later converted to Islam, which led to the emergence of the "Taliban".

They destroyed a non-Islamic thing, including the "Bamiyan Buddha".

In fact, it can't be said to be the destruction of the country, but the inheritance of China's civilization and culture has not been interrupted.

The Four Ancient Civilizations are the first four countries to enter a civilized society in the ancient history of the world. In order, they are ancient Babylon, ancient Egypt, ancient China, and ancient India. Among them, only China's culture has survived, and the other three ancient civilizations have all died out.

The rich knowledge of philosophy, science, literature, art, etc., that mankind possesses today all derives from their classical civilization.

This is complicated to say.

First of all, the American Indian civilization existed.

In the long course of history, the Indians of the Americas left behind a fairly high ancient civilization. The cultivation and cultivation of a variety of crops represented by corn has made it one of the cradles of agricultural civilization in the world; The architectural art represented by the Pyramid of the Sun God is jaw-dropping and a wonderful flower in the history of world architectural art; The national costumes represented by the eagle feather crown are brightly colored and exquisitely made, adding bright colors to the world's national culture; The incomprehensible "mystery of the Sphinx", represented by the Nazca Wasteland paintings, still makes people feel mysterious and inspires more scholars to explore and decipher.

Secondly, the four ancient civilizations.

Ancient Babylon, destroyed by Persia in 538 BC.

Ancient Egypt generally refers to the Egyptian civilization in the lower Nile region from around the 32nd century BC to the fall of Persia on Egypt in 343 BC.

Ancient India, and finally the Aryans, a nomadic people invaded northwestern India, founded a more enduring civilization in India.

Again, why is it said that Chinese civilization has not been broken?

Needless to say, there are only ruins left of ancient Babylon.

The race of ancient India was conquered and enslaved by the Aryans, and later by the Mongols, and then the arrival of the British, which completely made India a British territory, and English became the lingua franca in India, that is to say, the people who represented India in history were no longer the Indians who created ancient India for most of the time, and they were not in terms of language, culture, and skin color.

Egypt is the same, first ruled by Rome, then conquered by the Arabs, and then occupied by the Turks and the British, in history, the real Egyptians have a long history after all, from 5,000 years ago to 2,000 years ago, a total of 3,000 years, but since then they have been ruled by foreign races, and now the Egyptians are basically Ea (Rab) mixed race, and the culture is also typical Islamic culture, and the language is Arabic.

Although China has also been invaded by the Mongols and invaded by the West in modern times, and has culturally introduced foreign Buddhism and socialism, the Juche nation representing China has not changed, the Juche language has not changed, and the foundation of civilization has not changed, so except for the ideological field, it can be said that the Chinese have been in the same line from ancient times to the present.

Hehe, what you said is true, this is actually very easy to understand, in a word, the law of the jungle is just the strongest, China just happened to meet that time, at that time, China was the weakest, and at that time, people were just so strong, don't beat you to anyone. It's true that others are stronger than us, but if a powerful enemy bullies you, you have to resist, but if you can't beat others, you can only have a war of words. However, there is still bullying in war of words, and now it is mainly manifested in the economic aspect, with various restrictions and military restrictions in various aspects.

If people can invade you at a very small price, they will definitely invade you, just like the end of the Qing Dynasty.

As for who you said likes to fight for hegemony, I think everyone likes it, what was the beginning of the United States? It's just a big bird, it's only been a few hundred years since the founding of the People's Republic of China, what was the beginning of China? It is the Central Plains, which is also a little bigger, and it has developed for thousands of years to have its current territory.

As for Russia, it was just a small principality under the Mongol Empire at the beginning, and if it didn't invade, where would it come from?

You say that the United States talks about reality every day? Not necessarily, it is true that the water is often brought to the outside world, whenever there is something that cannot be solved in the country, through aggression, or the overlord clause, the danger will be passed on, and it is said that the Chinese are not treated well outside, hehe, it's just that the strength of our mother country is not strong enough, if it is strong enough, then we are the boss outside. You don't see people outside often call them Tang people, or Han people, because in that era, we China was the most powerful, and they remember this to make them both respectful and afraid of "China". But now China has only been born for more than 60 years, and now is a critical period for breaking through and breaking into a butterfly.

Well said, the education that stifles creativity is still going on, and we have a lot of homework and dozens of test papers.

It is pure nonsense to say that homework kills creativity, is it that illiterate people are creative? Do you think education in the U.S. is really that good? Really don't have the burden of homework?

Miss by a mile. If there is no homework, what do children do after school? Playing games?

What can a child without homework do but play? Why are the children of the poor poor? Have you ever thought about it?

Because the children of the poor and the rich have the same number of classes a day, but the children of the rich have a special tutor at home, and they are still learning and constantly enriching their brains. And the children of the poor come home and go to herd sheep or play, how can they compare with the children of rich families who study every day? This is the reason why it is difficult to produce a noble son from a poor family.

You can refer to the history of the Northern Song Dynasty supporting the Mongols to destroy the Jin, and then the Mongols to destroy the Song Dynasty.

Israel is the best example of this. You can check it out when you have time.

In ancient China, when conquering a certain place, it must have been forcibly occupied by military means, and then insisted on maintaining stability for a period of time, and then reached a balance of payments in the newly conquered area, which was considered to be the completion of annexation.

For example, the Han Dynasty's conquest of the four counties of Hexi, the first step was for Comrade Huo Qubing to defeat the Xiongnu who controlled the place through military means, and then "its people were either poor in the eastern part of the country, or to repay excessive grievances, or to rebel against the way of death, and their families were subordinate", and enriched it through immigration and other means, so when Hexi "is vast and sparse, water and grass are suitable for animal husbandry, and the animals of Liangzhou are the world's rao", the annexation was successful.

The basis for the implementation of this "three-step" is to have such a base that is sufficient to support the expenses and logistics of the newly conquered areas before the balance of payments, and it must be not far from the new areas - you can't expect the Yangtze River Delta to be logistics for the Songnen Plain, right?

So what are the places in ancient China that can be used as this base?

Restricted by the topography, China is separated by plateaus, mountains, etc. A series of plains and basins, and these plains and basins are often important agricultural areas, densely populated areas of ancient Chinese, and are also natural bases for progress.

Several places that failed, one is the Hetao, the Hetao has before and after, since the Warring States Period Zhao Wuling King Kaiyun as the beginning, China's business in this place has been until the Yuan Dynasty, the Ming Dynasty did not have a backset of one reason is that the Fengzhou River where Dongsheng is located was destroyed in the war at the end of the Yuan Dynasty, and the entire north of the early Ming Dynasty was short of manpower, not to mention the redevelopment of the secondary Hetao; One is Jiaoluan, that is, the Red River Delta, which was destroyed in the late Tang Dynasty and the war in the Central Plains of the Five Dynasties, so that the national consciousness appeared here, and the separatist tendency became more and more serious, and finally the Ming Dynasty failed to rescue it.

And then there is Liaodong. Liaodong was supposed to be a base for China's advance into the Songnen Plain and the Korean Peninsula, but Liaodong has never been able to play the role of a base.

The fundamental reason is that the successive dynasties failed to effectively develop Liaodong, so that the Liaohe Plain could not be used as a base for advancing Korea, and the cost of transporting materials from North China and Shandong to Liaodong and Korea across the sea was too high, and it was not a long-term solution, so the cost of conquering Korea was too high, so it had to be abandoned.

There are many reasons for this.

The most important thing is that China is an ancient civilization, with strong cultural dominance and abundant human resources, and it will not easily defeat China by war alone.

Another important point is the location. First of all, you see, China is located in the east of Asia, its east and south are the ocean, it is very difficult to completely defeat a country from the sea aspect, here is talking about defeat, in addition, there are many Central Asian countries in the north and west of China, especially in the west, although they are not strong in combat, but they play a role as a barrier in the empire to occupy China, and if you want to occupy China, you must cross them, which is very troublesome.

Of course, except for the end of the Qing Dynasty, China has been one of the best in the world in the development of all dynasties, not that they can't annex China, but they don't have this powerful power, Asia is only the most powerful in ancient times, of course, Europe, such as the British Empire, the French Empire, you will say that it is particularly powerful, but you have to think about it, the mandarin duck fights, and it is almost around the earth to attack one or two countries, you can imagine how much manpower and material resources will be spent, even in the current era, There is no other country than the United States that can do it, right?

In short, there are many reasons.

First, the geographical area is large and the strategic depth is deep; Second, most of the surrounding countries are small countries (except Russia); Third, the most important thing is the courage, patriotism, and wisdom of the people.