Please help me, family property disputes! 5

2.Electrical appliances do not belong to joint property, it is your pre-marital property, you have ownership, you are married, so the 30,000 yuan bride price also belongs to joint property, and you have the right to enjoy half of it (there are also special circumstances: if the parties request the return of the bride price paid in accordance with customs, if it is ascertained that it belongs to the following circumstances, the people's court shall support it:

1) The parties have not gone through the marriage registration formalities; (2) The parties have gone through marriage registration formalities but do not live together; (3) Payments made before marriage and causing hardship to the payor. The application of the provisions of items (2) and (3) of the preceding paragraph shall be conditional on the divorce of both parties. The stipulations of this condition indicate that the people's courts have officially made clear provisions on how to deal with bride price disputes in the form of judicial interpretations).

3.You do not need to repay the debts owed by your husband when he starts a company after marriage (the liability of the company is limited, the creditor can only claim the debt from the debtor, and the debt of the company is not claimed with personal family property).

The main provisions of the Marriage Law on the division of joint property between husband and wife.

Article 17 The following property acquired by husband and wife during the existence of their marital relationship shall be jointly owned by the husband and wife:

1) Wages and bonuses;

2) the income from production and operation;

3) income from intellectual property rights;

4) Property obtained by inheritance or donation, except as provided for in paragraph 3 of Article 18 of this Law;

5) Other property that shall be jointly owned.

Husbands and wives have equal rights to dispose of jointly owned property.

Article 18: In any of the following circumstances, it is the property of one of the husband and wife:

1) the pre-marital property of one of the parties;

2) Medical expenses, living allowances for the disabled, and other expenses received by one party as a result of bodily injury;

3) Property that is determined in the will or gift contract to belong to only one of the husband or wife;

4) Daily necessities for the exclusive use of one side;

5) Other property that shall belong to one side.

Joint Property] The main provisions of the judicial interpretation on the division of the joint property of the husband and wife.

If you can prove that the house was bought after your father got married, and you have the right to inherit the house and cash, see the provisions of the Inheritance Law

Chapter II Statutory Inheritance.

Article 9: Men and women are equal in inheritance rights.

Article 10 The inheritance shall be carried out in the following order:

First order: spouse, children, parents.

Second order: siblings, grandparents, maternal grandparents.

After the inheritance begins, it is inherited by the first-order heirs, and the second-order heirs do not. If there is no first-order heir, the second-order heir shall inherit.

The term "children" in this Act includes legitimate children, illegitimate children, adopted children and dependent stepchildren.

The term "parents" in this Act includes biological parents, adoptive parents and dependent stepparents.

The term "brothers and sisters" in this Law includes siblings of the same parents, half-siblings or half-siblings, adoptive siblings, and step-siblings who have a dependent relationship.

Article 11: Where the children of the decedent die before the decedent, the descendants of the decedent's children are to inherit by subrogation. A subrogated heir can generally only inherit his father's or mother's share of the estate.

Article 12: Where a widowed daughter-in-law has fulfilled the primary obligation to support her father-in-law or mother-in-law, or a widowed son-in-law to her father-in-law or mother-in-law, she is to be the first-order heir.

Article 13: The share of inheritance inherited by heirs in the same order shall generally be equal.

Heirs who lack the ability to work who have special difficulties in life shall be taken care of when distributing the inheritance.

For the 300,000 cash left by your father, you and your mother should share it equally.

For specific matters, it is best to turn to a law firm, find a better lawyer, and see if there is a way to solve the problem.

First of all, prove that the house was bought by your parents during their marriage, so half of it is your father's. You'll get a part of the house by inheriting your father's share.

The agreement between you and your mother is valid if it is signed by both parties and you can claim your amount in court.

I think your father must have had a lawsuit when he was in charge, you can go to the judgment of the year, the judgment must have provisions on raising children, followed by the distribution of children's property, if there was no lawsuit that year, and your mother inherited smoothly, I suggest you go to a lawyer to ask, in this case, what rights and interests the children have.

The joint property of the husband and wife shall be divided equally in accordance with the law.

From a legal point of view, children also have the right to inherit, and the eldest daughter cannot get nothing just because the eldest daughter is married and the second daughter is a son-in-law. Parents should also think that the eldest daughter has been filial piety for many years, and she should give her eldest daughter a little property. As the youngest daughter, morally speaking, she is not benevolent enough, her own sisters, the economic conditions are not very bad, and the property left by her parents can also be said to be a memory.

How can you do it alone? What's more, the eldest sister also helped you do your filial piety. So I think the second daughter should give one set to her sister from the house allocated by the demolition of the ancestral house.

Everyone is harmonious and reconciled. Sisterhood is deep, and it is also a comfort to parents and a kind of filial piety. Money, if you lose it, you can start it again, and family affection can't be exchanged for any money!

I understand your mood very well, but the customs in the countryside are like this, the second daughter is equivalent to a son at home, if the daughter and the son share the property in the countryside is not good, in the law, you are not likely to win the lawsuit in this situation, stick to the heart of tolerance to the end!

If the old man has passed away, the note is valid.

Half of the land left by your biological mother is divided equally between you and your father, and if your father divorces, three-quarters of it needs to be divided equally with your stepmother.

But the notary office demanded that all relatives be present,??

I don't need it... What kind of notary office is this?

First of all, if this real estate certificate is in the name of your current parents, if you want to transfer your name, you only need your current parents to agree to transfer, as long as the two of them take the real estate certificate, go directly to the transfer of your name, and what notarization do you have to do?。。 In some places, it is really inexplicable to apply for a real estate certificate.

Regardless of whether your stepfather's daughter has supported her father or not, she has the right to inherit a portion of the property. However, if your stepfather is gone, the house is still your mother's right to live, and as long as your mother is there, no one else has the right to fight for the house. After all, your stepfather contributed the money, and it is natural for his daughter to inherit part of the property, there is nothing unbalanced, but this is all for later.

Compare your heart to your heart and empathize with you. Consult a professional.

Regardless of whether your stepfather's daughter has supported her father or not, she has the right to inherit a portion of the property.

This sentence is correct.

But if the stepfather is gone, then ... His daughter will inherit part of the property... For example, 1/6 of the house belongs to her...

Your mother owns half of the property first, and your stepfather's half is inherited by your mother, you, and your stepfather's daughter... 1/6 each... If you don't ** the house is converted into money to divide...

Maybe give your stepfather's daughter some of the money to keep the house.

But your stepfather's daughter also has the right to inherit property, so it's better to consult with Rishi.

Hello for your question, 1, this depends on who your father gave at that time, if it is given to your own, then it is one party's property, if it is given to both parties, then it is joint property. If it is the property of one party, then the other party should return the part of the loan to the other party.

2. Of course, the agreement is valid, and you have breached the contract, you cannot cancel it, and if you want to return it, it depends on what the 10,000 yuan is at that time, if it is a deposit, then it is to be returned twice, if not, you must also bear the liability for breach of contract.

3. The gift has been completed, and your father cannot take it back.

4. If you want to move back, the only trouble is your brother's agreement, as long as you can cancel the agreement, there are really no other legal ways.

1. The property acquired during the period of marital savings is the joint property of the husband and wife.

2. The agreement has expired, and both parties have not executed the agreement (one party has not paid the full amount, and the other party has not transferred the real estate) The agreement is automatically invalid. (For subjective speculation, see Contract Law).

3. The property rights of the house have belonged to you, and no one has interfered with your right to dispose of the property.

3. It is difficult to conclude this matter, and it is easy to deal with it by taking the real estate certificate to sue your brother for vacating the house, but the old father is alive and well, so you can't ignore it. 4. You might as well start a lawsuit to analyze the property, and the court will issue a judgment that you are the legal property owner, and wait for the father to claim his rights after a hundred years. Isn't that safe?

Yes, it depends on who your father gave it to at the time, and this question is very important! Be cautious when handling it.

The matter can be resolved by litigation, and if there is a divorce agreement, the woman's heirs can claim their rights.

1. The house belongs to the woman and is inherited by the woman's legal heirs.

2. The woman's parents are not there, and her legal heirs only have children, so the house belongs to the children.

3. The child has the right to ask the man to transfer the house to his name, and if the man refuses, the child can file a lawsuit with the court.

The ownership of the house only recognizes the head of the household on the property right, and after the divorce, it means that there is no property and other property rights disputes, and the law does not support the repudiation after the divorce, and the solution is to solve it.

1. The parties renegotiate and settle the matter.

2. If it cannot be resolved, change the cause of action to re-file the court and request the court to make a new judgment.

Although the property has not been transferred, the divorce agreement has come into effect and the husband has not raised a property objection within the statutory prosecution period, so he does not claim all the rights to the property! If the woman dies unexpectedly, according to the inheritance law, the property should be inherited by the woman's parents and children as the first-order heirs; However, in order to take care of the children and avoid another round of inheritance disputes in the future, in the case of the woman's parents giving up the inheritance and notarization, the children can directly go to the housing management office to go through the transfer procedures directly with the divorce agreement of the parents and the notarial certificate of renunciation of inheritance! Of course, as a matter of fact, as a matter of fact, as the father and his later spouse, as the spouse of his subsequent marriage, the children should be allowed to live in and use the property, so as to welcome a new round of legal inheritance activities to recreate the property, and achieve harmony and happiness for the whole family.

Otherwise, being entangled in past grievances will only make things more complicated and unsolvable!

One. Now the house is still in your father's name, and it is your father's. That is, the agreement signed by the two of them has no legal effect.

Two. Now the house is still your father's. It has nothing to do with your brother.

Three. Your father will change the name of the house to you now, and the two of you can go to the housing authority to go through the relevant procedures. Specifically, your father gave you property. It has nothing to do with your brother and your divorced sister-in-law.

Regarding the divorce agreement, although your brother said in the agreement that the house will be transferred to the name of his daughter, in fact, this article has no legal effect at all, like: If I get divorced, I write in the divorce agreement that the house in your name will be transferred to my child's name, do you think about it, this may work? Because the house does not belong to the joint property of their husband and wife at all.

Your dad wrote a written commitment agreeing to give the house to your brother, it doesn't matter if you are not there, I believe that your dad has his reasons for arranging this way, even if it doesn't make sense, the paperwork in black and white cannot be reversed. As for your brother's affairs, the agreement signed between your brother and your father is of course valid, and you have no chance to get the house, and now the house belongs to your brother. Now your dad wants to change the name of the house to you, and it won't work.

Your sister-in-law wants to have a child, but your brother doesn't agree to give the child to her, and your sister-in-law has no way to get a house.

1 The house is essentially the joint property of your parents, and any disposition must be done with the consent of both parents.

2 The agreement signed between your father and your brother is a gift agreement, and as long as the gift has not been completed (as is the case now, the house has not been transferred to your brother), the donor, that is, your father, can change his mind at any time and refuse to give it, which is a clear provision of the law.

3 As long as the house is not transferred, the house is still your parents' own, and they have the right to change the object of the gift, so there is no problem if you want to transfer the house to you, but your parents and all three of you must be present to sign the house transfer procedures.

Now we have two questions. 1. The house is still in your father's name. He has the right to transfer the house to you.2 Your father and your brother have a letter of commitment.

You don't have to think about that. Because it's between your dad and your brother. It has nothing to do with you.

3. Your sister-in-law is annoying. can be given to you. As for how to settle that agreement with him and your brother.

As long as your brother is fine. That agreement is an internal matter within your family. Whether it works or not is up to your dad and your brother to decide.

If there's anything wrong with your brother. It has nothing to do with you. That's their business.

Got it. What I want to tell you is: The house can be transferred to you.