It doesn t matter if you are rich or not, what matters is whether you have self control beyond other

This sentence also fully describes the rich man, who is always working non-stop. And the poor are always thinking and not acting.

Lovers eventually become married, and those who have no money can witness it with their own eyes.

I think what this sentence wants to show is that rich people are more capable of action, while poor people look over and over again but dare not take the first step, and there is some truth in this sentence.

It's the rich people, well, the more they do, the more people who don't have money will look, and they will know to see the actions of the rich.

In our lives, there is a gap between the rich and the poor, and between the poor and the rich, what is the real gap between them? Is it in concrete wealth?

There is no difference between the poor and the rich in nature, but the way of thinking is different. The most important abilities of a person are willpower and self-control, because these two points can make you stick to something and not give up halfway.

The rich are 20% of the world's people, and the poor are 80% of the world's people;

The rich buy time, and the poor sell time;

The rich find a good employee, and the poor find a good job;

The rich make money above the neck, and the poor make money from the neck down;

The rich do the business, the poor do the work;

The rich value experience, and the poor value education;

The rich believe that action has results, and the poor believe that knowledge is power;

The rich think I want to be rich, and the poor think I want to be rich.

The rich man is an investor, and the poor man is a consumer;

The rich find the answer in the question, and the poor find the question in the answer;

The rich create opportunities, and the poor miss them;

The rich look to the future, and the poor lie in the present;

The rich act according to successful experiences, and the poor do what they want;

The rich do the simple things repeatedly, and the poor do not do the simple things;

The rich will do what they will do tomorrow, and the poor will do what they do tomorrow.

How the rich think can do it, the poor think it can't be done;

The rich are influenced by the successful, and the poor are influenced by the losers;

The rich believe that they will succeed in the future, and the poor believe that this is what it is;

The rich change themselves first, and the poor change others first;

The rich love to fight, and the poor love to get angry;

The rich love to encourage and praise others, and the poor love to criticize and insult others;

The rich have the courage to take responsibility, and the poor are afraid to take responsibility;

The rich will persevere, and the poor will give up.

First of all, in the economic aspect, the rich have capital as long as they want to do anything, while the poor always have insufficient energy; Again, it's the way of thinking, the rich are never satisfied, but the poor are content!

If it is from a material level, the most important thing is to look at the "three sons": the house, the ticket, and the car. If you look at it from the spiritual level, the most important thing is to look at a person's connotation and comprehensive quality.

The poor will get rich, and the rich will get poor.

One has money, one has no money.

Thinking, it is important to have a positive and forward thinking.

Material basis.

Lifestyle. Mindset.

Pursue class.

Rich people are always thinking about how to make money.

With money ($ vs. no money ($ only.

The stage is as big as the heart.

I'm not a professional, but I feel that there is a link between IQ and self-control, but not fundamentally.

What I do know is that people have two kinds of quotients, intelligence quotient (IQ) and emotional intelligence (EQ), and self-control should fall under the category of emotional intelligence.

Emotional quotient usually refers to the emotional quotient, abbreviated as EQ, which mainly refers to the quality of people in terms of emotion, will, and tolerance to frustration, including the guide quotient (LQ) and so on. Generally speaking, there is no obvious innate difference in emotional intelligence between people, and it is more closely related to the cultivation of nurture. It is a concept that has been proposed by psychologists in recent years to correspond to IQ.

At the simplest level, improving emotional intelligence is the ability to understand and relate to others by changing the part that cannot control emotions into those that can be controlled.

According to Goleman and other researchers, this intelligence is made up of five characteristics: self-awareness, emotional control, self-motivation, awareness of other people's emotions, and dealing with interrelationships. [1]

Emotional intelligence is increasingly being applied to business management. For organizational managers, emotional intelligence is an important component of leadership.

IQ is an objective thing, born with it, and it is a hard condition, while EQ is more like software, which can be designed and regulated by itself.

This proves that IQ and self-control have nothing to do with each other.

To become a good person requires personal struggle, and to become a rich person also needs a historical itinerary. No character can guarantee you to be rich. The rich are the ones who have survived a lot of brutal fighting, and if any of these links go wrong, they have no chance to become rich.

It can only be said that most rich people have some commonalities, such as perseverance, not being confined to details, and being responsible; But there are many people with such a character, and very few end up becoming rich. Rich people become rich because there is a platform for them to play. If Han Xin hadn't become the founding general of China's first stable unified regime, he would have been blown into a soldier by a bunch of people in later generations?

In the same era, there was Li Zuoche, who had a similar strategic vision to him, but people who were not familiar with Chu Han did not know who this person was.

Must have grace, be cultivated, have connotation, have a background, a man can be ugly, but never ugly. We must have a sense of responsibility, whether it is for our career or our family, whether it is for our parents, wives and children, or friends and brothers, we must take on our responsibilities, those who are selfish are not good men, and those who shirk and escape are not men! You should learn to make money, don't think that you can make a fortune by saving money, money is earned, not saved, to provide enough life for the family, so that the family can live a quality life, not to fill the stomach.

Regardless of gender, wealth or poverty, or level of education, they must possess the following three qualities: kindness, education, and principle. If you are kind, you will not hurt others; If there is culture, it will be gentle and humble; If there is a principle, you know what you must never do and what you must do (such as filial piety).

Faith: Whatever you believe, persevere to the end. Loyalty:

To family, to friends, to love. Honesty: Very important.

Confidence: to yourself. Capabilities:

I think any ability can be learned, depending on your subjective ability dynamics, too much, try to learn as much as possible.

From my personal senses, I think people who are gentle, kind, courteous, thrifty and sincere are the most attractive. There is no aggressive momentum, no pessimistic mood, no affection, no greed, no hypocrisy. The relationship is frank and swaying, like a spring breeze.

Whether you are poor or rich, you want to have a positive attitude towards life, a life that is not suitable for a calculating life, a character that is not too good and not too bad, too good will be bullied, too bad will be disliked, live your own life, do what you want, it is okay to be curious, but you have to choose the right time, all negative energy should not appear in your life, so, work hard.

That's resilience. In ancient times, there were Cao Cao, Liu Bei, and recently there were pioneers represented by Zeng Guofan. Resilience is about being able to persevere in good times and bad, no matter how little hope, no matter how big the blows.

Kindness, this is really, as a teacher, some children are really not simple from being careful, they have bad intentions, and their childhood is so chilling and disgusting. I think he is older, and he is also the one who makes you avoid it.

Dream. Maybe sometimes, you have to kneel, then kneel, maybe sometimes, you have to flatter, then flatter, maybe sometimes, you have to cry, then cry. But there must be dreams, dreams can have hope, and only then will I feel that everything today is for tomorrow.

The technological revolution, globalization, Internet technology, and the magic of finance have made the return on capital much higher than the return on labor today. Wealth is becoming more and more concentrated in a more efficient way and at a faster rate to the rich. As a result, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.

The convergence of technology and capital gives rise to the Matthew effect of wealth accumulation, which in turn further creates the Matthew effect of time, that is, the rich are getting more and more idle, while the poor are getting busier.

High-income earners have abundant money and scarce time, so high-income earners make rational choices, hiring others to do mechanical repetitive work, dirty work, and things they don't want to do without input-output ratio, such as carrying, cooking, cleaning, sorting out documents, etc., and only focus on the work they are interested in, have high premium ability and scale effect, and urge others to complete their work. As a result, the wealthy's incomes snowballed and they had more time at their disposal. The wealth of the poor is shrinking in simple and repetitive labor, and more and more time is at their disposal, and the Matthew effect of time runs coldly.

The Matthew effect of time, in turn, acts on the Matthew effect of wealth, causing the wealth of the rich to continue to grow and the poor to get poorer. The Matthew effect of wealth is caused by the scarcity of psychological bandwidth, the reason for poverty and wealth is whether you have leisure and whether you use the best quality time to complete the most input-output work, while the poor have more leisure time to rest and think due to the scarcity of bandwidth due to simple, mechanical and repetitive work. The rich get richer and the poor get poorer, behind this is an economic account of time, how you use your time determines how much wealth you have, how much wealth you have determines how much time you have, and the future of your children.

The most essential thing is thinking, the poor feel that they don't want to die of hunger, and they don't want to do anything else, they are bored, so they will become more and more idle, and they don't know what to do as a whole, and the rich are busy with their own things, and they come forward when they see business opportunities, to deal with a lot of things to pave the way for their new business opportunities, even if they don't find business opportunities, they will read more books on weekdays, listen to celebrity speeches, and take the initiative to find some business opportunities that they see, the rich are getting busier and richer, and the poor even if there are business opportunitiesIn fact, even if you are born poor, you have a loving head, love service actions, and eventually become rich, even if you are the second generation of rich, idle all day long, will not do anything, your generation is not hungry, but suffer your next generation, they must work harder to make up for your waste.

The rich are getting busier and busier, and the poor are getting more and more salty, this logic is not a real phenomenon at all, but it means that we see the rich, he takes our poor people's money to land some projects, or raise some things, and we poor people have no place to play their own strengths.

No, the rich have leisure, and the poor are poor.

Exhausted for a living, you see a rich man still working at two o'clock in the morning, and that's just because he has all kinds of opportunities to take a break during the day.

The idea of the rich is not to make more money, but to challenge themselves and play to their extremes.

Limit, the poor don't think so much, just want to be enough, why bother to be tired, go out to play with a little spare money, and go busy for a few months if you don't have it.

To put it simply, there are no poor people in this world, only lazy people.

Ambition, the poor have no ambition.

It's amazing to be rich, at least you don't have to be looked down upon, you don't have to suffer.

A person's humiliation does not need to look at a person's face. But money can't buy family, love, or friendship. He is hypocritical, unreal.

But there are still people in society who kill each other for it, abandon and sell themselves. This kind of greed for vanity to win people, even if you have money, you will never be able to get the sincere hospitality of others.

Of course, the reality of society today is that money can make the devil grind.

In fact, the rich and the poor are different, if you have money, you will think that you are very great and arrogant, you will always be high, in saying that the current society is a society of money, rich is supposed to be, we should all look at money, but people ignore themselves and I, they look down on the poor, I am here to persuade the rich to say a word, rich is supposed to be, and we are not living for money, the poor are also people, there is no need to look down, everyone lives on the same earth, why bother! Having money is amazing, it depends on how you do it, money also has feelings, where does it come from.

From the perspective of current universal values, the amount of money a person can dispose of is the most important and intuitive object that reflects a person's value.

There are several elements to measure the value of an object:

1: Measurable (personal ability is excluded).

2: Comparable (art is excluded).

3: It will not be fixed with the time of the current or other axes to deteriorate and depreciate (appearance and figure are excluded).

4: Negotiable can be easily exchanged for other resources (IQ, talent, etc. are excluded).

If you look around the world, you can't find the second thing that meets all four of these four at the same time, so the importance of money is self-evident. By the way, money can buy friendship, love can be bought, family affection can be bought, and even life can be bought, because almost everything can be measured in terms of money, and if you don't agree, I'll give you an example

I'm going to buy your loved one's life for 500, and of course you won't agree to call me crazy. I said 50 million? You won't agree to call the police (note that you're already a madman and you feel like my advice is a de facto threat to your loved ones That's the power of money), what if I'm willing to use 5 billion?

What about 50 billion? I can tell you unequivocally that there is no difference between the outcome of your unwillingness and your willingness, the difference is only whether the money is given to you or to someone else (in this case, the power of money has forced you to fully accept the result, and thus consider the question of how you will be compensated for the result, and the power of money can go so far).

In addition, for love and friendship, some people say that beauty does not love you, it loves your money. I can suggest that you think about it another way: money is a part of someone, and they love their money as they love him, because of the nature of money (note the four points), money and the owner are inseparable.

So money buys love, family, friendship, and pretty much everything you can imagine in the whole world, because the only quantifiable measure of value is money, and it's money.

Detached from society, money is worthless.