How much share does the father in law s son in law get?

In the case of legal inheritance, the son-in-law does not have the right to inherit and can only be inherited by the daughter.

Article 10: [Scope of Heirs and Order of Succession] The inheritance of the estate shall be in the following order:

First order: spouse, children, parents.

Second order: siblings, grandparents, maternal grandparents.

After the inheritance begins, it is inherited by the first-order heirs, and the second-order heirs do not. If there is no first-order heir, the second-order heir shall inherit.

The term "children" in this Act includes legitimate children, illegitimate children, adopted children and dependent stepchildren.

The term "parents" in this Act includes biological parents, adoptive parents and dependent stepparents.

The term "brothers and sisters" in this Law includes siblings of the same parents, half-siblings or half-siblings, adoptive siblings, and step-siblings who have a dependent relationship. (See Succession at Article -24).

Article 12: [Inheritance Rights of Widowed Daughters-in-law and Sons-in-law] Where a widowed daughter-in-law has fulfilled the primary obligation of support to her father-in-law or mother-in-law, or a widowed son-in-law to her father-in-law or mother-in-law, she is to be the first-order heir. (See Article 35 of Women's Rights, see Article 35 of Inheritance).

Look at how many children he has and what he wants.

If there is no will, and there is only one daughter, it will be his daughter!

belongs to his immediate family, and the son-in-law is estimated to have no share.

first-order heirs; Spouse, children, parents. This is what the Inheritance Act provides.

It should be inherited by the daughter, and the next thing is the property relationship between the husband and wife. See how you divide it.

The daughter and son-in-law have two suites, whose name is on the real estate certificate, did one party buy it separately before marriage, and who died? Whose son is it, the son of his daughter and son-in-law? Does mother-in-law mean the daughter's mother?

These are prerequisites.

Assuming that these two houses are the joint property of the daughter and son-in-law after marriage, then the property is half of the daughter and son-in-law, and the daughter dies, and her inheritance is simply only one house, and the inheritance is inherited by the daughter's husband, that is, the son-in-law and the daughter's son, and the daughter's parents, then, the son-in-law will take one-third, the son will take one-third, and the mother-in-law will take one-third.

Then, when the son-in-law dies, his estate should be one-third of one property and another, and his mother-in-law has no inheritance of the estate, only his parents and his son inherit together, that is, the score, so the daughter and son-in-law's two houses should be the son-in-law's son divided one-third plus one-half plus one-sixth that is, a house.

The mother-in-law took one-third of the other property, and the son-in-law's parents took two-thirds of the other property.

Of course, on the other hand, if the son-in-law dies first and the daughter dies later, then the mother-in-law will take two-thirds, the son-in-law's parents will take one-third, and the son will still have half of the property.

Daughter and son-in-law have two suites, shouldn't the house belong to their children after the daughter and son-in-law die? Why does my mother-in-law want to mix it up.

This depends on whose name the house is, and whether there is a will!

In any case, the proportion of sons must be higher than that of mothers-in-law!

What is this? There really is such an old man.

In my opinion, do you have the receipts that you paid when you bought the house, or can you prove that you paid for the house?

If not, you can only consult with him, or talk to him as evidence, as long as he admits itThe money to buy a house is 2I didn't say I bought it for him 3There is also when it is possible to change the name, for what purpose or reason he did not change the name.

If there is evidence to prove that you paid for this suite, you can not give him a cent, but it hurts your feelings (you have to be ruthless against this kind of person, you have to be ruthless to be ruthless, you have to be better than him, you have to be better than him), you have to be better than him) in law, this is the case in law, whoever pays for it is whomever it is.

So if you can prove it, you can sue him for returning the property.

Whoever it is, as long as there is a certificate for the bank deduction at that time. Fortunately, you didn't pay in cash at that time, you deducted the money from the bank, and if you didn't have a certificate, it would go to your wife after the divorce! That's the most detailed, thank you!

If you have an agreement, it will be easy to do it, otherwise it will only be regarded as you lending money to your father-in-law. He just needs to pay it back.

This one... Speaking of which, if you can't provide a valid proof of capital contribution, or if you can't provide a valid and legal notarized certificate of capital contribution, you should not have any rights to the house, because the title deed is in your father-in-law's name.

If a valid proof of capital contribution can be issued, then in the disposal of the house, it should be the proceeds after the sale of the house, and your capital contribution and your father-in-law's capital contribution will be returned, and the remaining part will be divided according to the proportion of your capital contribution.