Is the computer more academic or technical?

In recent years, the computer industry has become increasingly stable, and talents have emerged in an endless stream, and highly educated and high-tech people abound, and the education is not good. A few years ago, when the industry was not very mature, there was a shortage of people, so people with good skills and inconspicuous academic qualifications were also easy to stand out.

I think it is more important to pay more attention to technology, because in the face of strong enough technology, any academic qualification is useless, because no matter how high the academic degree is, it does not mean that your technology is very strong.

In private enterprises or small and medium-sized companies, it is useless to only look at ability, no matter how high the education is; Large enterprises look at academic qualifications, and it can even be said to be the threshold for entry; As for why private enterprises or small and medium-sized companies, they only look at ability, because most of what this kind of company does is outsourcing, and there will not be too many technical problems in comparison, and more attention is paid to employees who can work.

Technology, because most of the computers are operating, and there are some **, technology is more important, and academic qualifications can be improved, but it is difficult for technology to reach a high level.

I'll tell you the truth, I don't have any academic qualifications, I have hammer technology, I have learned the knowledge behind it, the algorithm and the underlying logic are quite rigorous, and it is difficult to understand without a certain mathematical foundation, and even this step has not reached the technical level. The quality of technology is relative, and ordinary people may think that the master of the computer city has ...... technologyHehe.

Emphasis is placed on academic qualifications, and technology can be continuously learned and improved, but if you don't have a good academic background, it is difficult to enter a large company.

But if you fancy technology, no matter how high your education is, you are a showman, and you can't do anything, and if you have technology, even if you don't have a degree, it is very valued.

More emphasis on technology. For computer science majors, technology is often more important than academic qualifications.

Why do we have to oppose academic qualifications and technology? Do you value more education or technology? Are there any contradictions between academic qualifications and technology?! High education and high technology are poor?! Or is it a low degree for a high level of technology?! I feel inexplicable, generally not the higher the education, the stronger the technology.

Good schools have good technology. A bad school doesn't necessarily have no good technology, and if there is, it's rare.

Wouldn't it be better if you had both academic qualifications and skills? Why do you have to choose one or the other?

It is very important, because the computer looks at your ability, and ability is generally linked to academic qualifications.

Yes, and the higher the education, the better the employment, and you can also find a very good job after graduation, and the salary package of this major is also very good.

Yes, it is very important that when the computer major is employed, the academic qualification can represent the professional ability of the person.

Yes, because the computer major itself is very considerate of a person's academic qualifications and some of the content of learning, it is difficult for people with low education to learn the essence of computers.

Yes, academic qualifications are very important, and the level of academic qualifications can be seen.

In general,Small and medium-sized enterprises in society are more tech-oriented when recruiting computer professionals, because he needs new people to come in and get started as soon as possible. Of course, state-owned enterprises, central enterprises, and domestic first-line Internet factories have mature talent training systems, as well as sufficient recruitment resources and costs, so they don't care much about personal technology. For them, the gap in the resumes of job seekers is more important, because special industries have strict background checks on employees, so fresh graduates will be more suitable for them.

In addition, cultivating from scratch is conducive to building employees' loyalty, so these large companies will choose to only recruit fresh graduates and must be recruited by school, so academic qualifications will naturally come first.

The computer technology position is different from other functional departments of the company, it requires the staff to have strong business ability and practical experience. If the company rashly recruits a novice in, the other party can not create value, not to mention, the company has to allocate manpower and material resources to train him, and in the end whether he can do the job is also unknown, this kind of "input-output ratio" is intolerable in many small and medium-sized enterprises that pursue efficiency. So these companies don't spend money to recruit a college graduate who has just come out, and of course under the guise of recruiting technical personnel to let the other party come in to do chores and then drive a very low salary, that's another matter.

Therefore, this kind of small and medium-sized enterprises will pay special attention to the experience and technical ability of job seekers, and academic qualifications are not so important in comparison.

However, large units such as state-owned enterprises and even central enterprises are neither short of money nor resources, so it doesn't matter if they recruit a new person to come over, even if the other party doesn't work for more than half a year. This kind of unit values the comprehensive quality of employees and family background, because the technology can be cultivated by themselves, then the academic background has become the only criterion for measuring job seekers, in addition, no one is cleaner than fresh graduates, so they will choose to go directly to the school recruitment process in the "985" and "211" universities.

Therefore, after analyzing the employment prospects of computer science majors, everyone should have a clear psychological positioning of themselves. If you are from a prestigious university, then you don't need to worry about technology and experience at all, just wait for state-owned enterprises or Internet companies to recruit on campus, and then you can get a good offer by learning a little more solidly. On the other hand, if you are only studying at a general university, then you need to accumulate experience and improve your software development skills, so that you can pass the interview for small and medium-sized companies.

I think that when you have just graduated from computer science, a company often pays more attention to your academic qualifications. Because you don't have any work experience, when the company wants you, it will pay more attention to your academic qualifications. But when you work for a few years, you tend to value your ability to work.

If your work ability is relatively strong, your academic qualifications are not really important to them.

One. Just graduated

When a person has just graduated, the company must not know what your real strength is, so they mainly look at your academic qualifications. If your academic diploma is relatively high, it means that your comprehensive literacy is relatively good. If your diploma is relatively low, it means that you may not study seriously and have a bad attitude towards work.

So for those who have just graduated, it may be more important to have your academic qualifications. <>

Two. After working for a while

But when you come out and work for a few years and then look for a new job, it may be that your personal skills are more important. Because when you go to the interview, he will test you on all kinds of questions and see how good you are. And you can also tell them about some of the projects you have done, so that he will know if your strength meets their requirements.

As long as you can contribute to them and meet their requirements, you can basically be recruited, and your academic qualifications are not very important. <>

Three. In general

So in general, in the computer industry, it may be that your strength will be more important. As long as your strength is strong, then you can be competent in any company, and people will basically not find fault with your academic qualifications. Because the computer industry has relatively high requirements for personal technology, your technology is not up to standard, and no matter how high your education is, it is useless.

This is a very real criterion, and it is not as nihilistic as other industries.

After reading it, remember to like + follow + **.

Personal technology. Computers are more practical and very operational, and if you are very skilled, you can still get this job.

More attention is paid to personal skills, high education does not mean that the person is more capable, so in addition to the academic background during the interview, you will also pay attention to the person's previous work experience, so that the consideration is more comprehensive.

Pay more attention to personal skills, because this is a practical profession. Even if your academic performance is good, what's the use if you don't know how to code?

It must be a key subject of a prestigious school depending on the academic qualifications!