Are receipts legally valid? Are receipts legally binding

Updated on society 2024-03-07
10 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    The receipt, as the original voucher, is an evidentiary basis with legal effect, and there is no need to question it.

    However, the issue of the statute of limitations will depend on the explicit content of the document.

    Generally, receipts should be used when invoices are not used. It is an important original document.

    Receipts and everyday sayings"White stripes"Receipts are also a kind of receipt and payment vouchers, and there are different types. As for whether it can be credited to the account, it depends on the type of receipt and the scope of use.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    As evidence of receipt, receipts have legal effect as long as they meet the objectivity, legitimacy, and relevance of the evidence.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    In most places in China, formal invoices are required for reimbursement, and receipts are not. If the company only issues receipts, it is not taxable. However, the issuance of a receipt means that there has been a buying and selling relationship between you, which is a certificate and has legal effect.

    Formal receipts need to be stamped with the seal of the Financial Services Bureau, if your receipt only has the company's seal, it is not a formal receipt. The reimbursement will definitely not be reimbursed, but there is no problem with a lawsuit.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    It should be effective, go to a law firm and ask, bring the receipt, let the professionals see, don't forget to go to a few more places, the same lawyer everyone's insights and abilities are different! The lawsuit is to win the war

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    As long as both parties sign their names, of course it works.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    The receipt can be used as a legal basis, and there is a financial seal of the other company, which basically has confirmed the fact of your transaction.

    A few suggestions:1Before filing a lawsuit, you must first find a lawyer to determine whether there are any loopholes in the receipt when it is standardized. Otherwise, it is not good for yourself.

    2.It is best to prepare other accessories at the time of purchase, such as quality certificates, warranty cards, etc., so that they can be used in the prosecution.

    Hope it helps

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Relatively small, receipts can be opened randomly.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Receipts are legally binding. A receipt that is complete and in accordance with the provisions of the law is legally valid. Generally, daily receipts should have five elements: payer, payee, reason for delivery, content and time.

    The receipt states the above five necessary elements, and it can take effect after the recipient signs and seals it. As evidence of receipt, receipts have legal effect as long as they meet the three characteristics of objectivity, legitimacy and relevance. Receipts can also be used as evidence after entering the judicial process, but they need to be cross-examined first.

    Receipts are divided into internal receipts and external receipts. According to the different supervision units, external receipts can be divided into three types: supervision by the financial department, supervision by the military and supervision by the tax department. Ordinary invoices can be divided into three types, namely stub copies, invoice copies, and accounting copies.

    Invoices and receipts are both vouchers issued when receiving and paying money, and in addition to the most direct differences between the two, there are also differences in types, functions and management.

    However, compared with formal invoices and other statutory forms of documentary evidence, its probative effect is low. Bump closed.

    That is, if there is a notarized receipt or other evidence in legal form that contradicts the probative effect of the receipt, the receipt may not be used as the basis for the verdict. A contract established in accordance with law shall take effect upon its establishment, unless otherwise provided by law or otherwise agreed by the parties.

    Legal basis

    Article 667 of the Civil Code? A loan contract is a contract in which the borrower borrows money from the lender and returns the loan at maturity with interest.

    Article 668: The loan contract shall be in written form, unless otherwise agreed upon between natural persons.

    The content of the loan generally includes terms such as the type of loan, currency, purpose, amount, interest rate, term and repayment method.

    Article 669 When entering into a loan contract, the borrower shall, as required by the lender, provide the true information about the business activities and financial status related to the loan.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    The receipt has the legal effect of Qin dry rock. A complete receipt consists of four parts: title, text, signature, and time. The receipt of complete content and compliance with the provisions of the law shall have legal effect.

    Generally speaking, the receipt should contain five elements: the payer, the recipient, the reason for delivery, the content of the delivery and the time of delivery. When the above five essential elements of the receipt are complete, the recipient signs and seals the receipt.

    [Legal Analysis].

    A receipt is a voucher issued by the recipient to the giver indicating the receipt of something or a certain money, which is used to reflect or prove the fact of receipt. Precautions when issuing IOUs, receipts, and IOUs are: The content should be relatively complete.

    The IOU should clearly state the amount of the arrears, the currency, or the quantity, specification, and basic natural attributes such as name, quality or model, the reason for the arrears, the date of return, the legal consequences of overdue payment, the exact name or name of the creditor and the debtor, and finally the debtor's signature or seal, and the date of issuance. In addition to the above matters, the IOU should also clearly state the loan period, interest, and penalty interest or liquidated damages that are not repaid if it is overdue. Be precise.

    Eliminate the use of vague terms such as approximately, estimated, probably, almost, etc.; Be clear and unambiguous in your meaning. It is best to have an IOU receipt in duplicate, one for each party. As a fast and convenient way of confirmation, the general conditions and documents are handwritten, the issuer is specific, and the identity of the subject must be confirmed.

    If it is a company, check whether the company has been cancelled, whether the company name is accurate, whether the natural person is an adult, whether it has full civil capacity, whether the name of the natural person is consistent with the ID card, in addition, the basic information of the subject should also be left, such as the natural person's age, address, work unit, etc.

    Legal basis

    Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

    Article 135:Civil juristic acts may be in written, oral, or other forms; Where laws or administrative regulations provide or the parties agree to adopt a specific form, the specific form shall be adopted.

    Article 469:The parties may conclude a contract in written, oral or other forms. The written form is a form in which the contents of the contract, letter, telegram, telex, fax, etc. can be tangibly expressed. Data messages that can be tangibly represented in electronic data interchange, e-mail, etc., and that can be accessed at any time shall be deemed to be in writing.

    The above is only the current information combined with my understanding of the law, please refer to it carefully!

    If you still have questions about this issue, it is recommended that you organize the relevant information and communicate with a professional in detail.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    1. The receipt has legal effect. But there is also a difference between IOUs, IOUs, and receipts.

    2. Where to pay attention.

    1) When borrowing, it is advisable to write "IOU", and it is not appropriate to write "IOU" IOU and IOU are both a kind of proof of creditor's rights and debts, but there is a big difference between the two. An IOU is a written voucher issued by the borrower to the lender, which proves that the two parties have established a loan contract relationship; Arrears of collection is a settlement basis based on the settlement of previous economic exchanges between the two parties, which is actually the settlement of past economic exchanges between the two parties, which only represents a pure creditor-debtor relationship, and does not represent a loan contract relationship. Therefore, it is advisable to write an "IOU" instead of an "IOU" when borrowing, so as to save the burden of proof in the litigation to explain the reason and purpose of the "arrears".

    2) The interest rate agreed upon by both parties should be written into the IOU when borrowing, and in practice, many creditors misunderstand that private loans cannot charge interest, so the interest is only verbally agreed and not written into the IOU. In fact, if the interest rate agreed between the borrower and the borrower does not exceed the annual interest rate24, and the lender requests the borrower to pay interest at the agreed interest rate, the people's court shall uphold it. The Civil Code stipulates that if there is no agreement on the payment of interest in a loan contract between natural persons or the agreement is not clear, it shall be deemed that no interest shall be paid.

    Where the loan contract between natural persons stipulates that interest shall be paid in turn, the interest rate of the loan shall not violate the provisions of the state on restricting borrowing. If the interest rate is not included in the IOU, and the lender sues and the borrower does not recognize the agreement between the parties, the lender's interest claim will not be upheld by the court.

    3) When borrowing, it is advisable to write the repayment period into the IOU, and the loan is protected by law within the statute of limitations, but in practice, many lenders are often unaware of the concept of "statute of limitations". Theoretical circles have different understandings of the statute of limitations for loans without an agreed repayment period. The grasp of this issue varies from place to place.

    Therefore, from the perspective of creditor's rights security, it is advisable to write the repayment period into the IOU when borrowing, and if the borrower fails to repay the loan within the time limit, the lender shall claim its rights against the borrower within 3 years after the loan is due (including filing a lawsuit with the people's court or having the borrower sign and confirm the demand notice).

    4) When borrowing, it is advisable to write the full name of the lender and the borrower in practice, the lender and the borrower are often closely related, and there is no general kinship, and the daily customary title should be written into the IOU when borrowing, such as writing the lender as "Uncle Zhang" and "Brother Zhang"; If the borrower is overdue for repayment, the lender wants to sue the borrower in court, and the court will often turn them away because the creditor's rights and debtor are not clear.

    5) When borrowing, the IOU should be clearly stated, and there is no ambiguity, and the typical case is that Zhang San borrowed 100,000 yuan from Li Si, and at the same time issued an IOU stating that he borrowed 100,000 yuan, and a few months later, Zhang San returned 10,000 yuan to Li, so he tore up the original IOU to tell Tong Qiyuan, and Zhang San re-issued an IOU for Li Si: "Zhang Sanyuan borrowed 100,000 yuan from Li Si, and now he owes 10,000 yuan." The word "return" here can be understood as "return."

    hag)", which can also be interpreted as "also."

    hai) owes" "still owed". This creates a controversy that is very detrimental to the lender.

Related questions
7 answers2024-03-07

If the receipt is written as a signature or seal, the signature is valid, if the receipt is required to be sealed, but there is no seal, and the unit does not recognize, the effect is to be determined, under normal circumstances, the receipt without the official seal has little effect, because the receipt without the official seal is not recognized in law, so the receipt must be stamped with the official seal or the signature of the parties. >>>More

5 answers2024-03-07

Hello, glad to answer for you.

Article 28 of the General Principles of the Civil Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates: "Grandparents who can afford it have the obligation to support their minor grandchildren whose parents have died or whose parents are unable to support them. Grandchildren who can afford it have the obligation to support their grandparents who have died or whose children are unable to support them. >>>More

9 answers2024-03-07

There are no procedures or legal provisions for "engagement". The law stipulates that a marriage is established after it is registered. Betrothal is not a procedure that is required by law, and the law does not prohibit the parties from having a voluntary engagement ceremony. >>>More

14 answers2024-03-07

The brotherly relationship is an identity relationship and cannot be dissolved. >>>More

8 answers2024-03-07

Such a person is a criminal, but there is no evidence to prove his guilt. Regardless of whether there is evidence or not, go to the prosecution, let everyone know what kind of person he is, don't ask for such a man, let him be punished, you said that you had no money and were deceived by him, and the law would re-sentence him to alimony. This kind of man dumped his wife with such a despicable means and didn't want to raise children, so he was not as good as a beast. >>>More