Is the efficiency of state owned enterprises really low?

The efficiency of state-owned enterprises will be relatively low, because the process of state-owned enterprises is complex, and internal employees have a stable mentality, and they will not be eliminated if they do not do the wrong thing, so their work enthusiasm and progress will be relatively slack, and the efficiency of state-owned enterprises is relatively low compared to private enterprises.

Hello, most of the state-owned enterprises are like this, efficiency comes from the enthusiasm of the staff, and the enthusiasm is driven by interests, because the wages of state-owned enterprises are too stable and have no encouraging effect, so the enthusiasm of the staff is much lower. And there are too many links to work, and if there is a problem in one of the links, then the other links will be suppressed.

It is said that to choose a job, you must choose a state-owned enterprise, which not only has a stable job but also has a good welfare package, and there is no sense of crisis in ordinary units. This is the view of the elderly in my hometown, if you can enter a state-owned enterprise, it will be a very good thing for your parents, state-owned enterprises are not easy to be eliminated, and the usual holidays are certain, there is not too much pressure, there is no pressure, of course, there will be less motivation.

Extended information: the low work efficiency of state-owned enterprises is still the reason for people and management, as far as the side is concerned, no one has ever treated the enterprise as their own home to operate, no one really cares how much the enterprise will profit, how to reduce costs, improve efficiency, all want to climb up by themselves, as long as nothing happens is the best. First of all, safety is always the most important, and we all work with a mentality that does not seek merit, but seeks no fault, so that the efficiency of work will definitely be particularly slow.

Not low, in fact, the work efficiency of state-owned enterprises is not low at all, it seems to be low because it is doing a lot of useless work, that is, it is essentially a thing that has no direct impact or help on production and operation, especially the safety of this piece, which has increased a lot of work business, resulting in most of the time every day to do this kind of work, to cope with all kinds of inspections, this useless thing is too much, so the work efficiency of state-owned enterprises is not low at all, just because they have been dealing with a lot of useless work and human exchanges, because in state-owned enterprises, Favor is the first, a lot of work has already formed a process, anyone can do it, it is nothing more than a matter of good or bad, and the impact of promotion or go to the easier place mainly lies in the sophistication of the people, in summary, in fact, the work efficiency of state-owned enterprises is quite high, but not like private enterprises, with profit as the first goal, so it seems very inefficient.

Hello, I can't say it's very low, I can only say it's not high, because this system is in, it determines the level of efficiency, no one can make decisions except the top leader, wait for each other, throw each other off, so the efficiency is low, thank you.

The work efficiency of state-owned enterprises is not necessarily really low, there are indeed some state-owned enterprises with low work efficiency, but most of them are very efficient, this mainly depends on how the leaders of state-owned enterprises determine the work requirements, if the work efficiency of state-owned enterprises is low, then there are no state-owned enterprises can survive now, so the work efficiency of state-owned enterprises is not necessarily very low.

The efficiency of SOEs is average. Because large companies are more in pursuit of stability, small companies will be more in pursuit of survival and development. Stability will lead to low work efficiency and dare not take risks.

However, state-owned enterprises also have advantages. For example, it has a brand, is well-known, and is more trusted and recognized by users. In general, the efficiency is not very high, and the industry status will be relatively high.

This claim is baseless. It's about looking at the whole picture in the form of negative energy. This is not right.

State-owned enterprises have a good working tradition and work style for many years. Deal with things. With the reform and opening up.

With the change of the general environment, it is also constantly improving and sublimating. Therefore, it is one-sided to say that the work efficiency of state-owned enterprises is low. This is unfounded.

Answer: We believe that the low work efficiency of state-owned enterprises is relative, but definitely not low.

If state-owned enterprises want to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of their work and performance, they must change their management concepts and mechanisms. Rather, only by changing various systems, mechanisms and models can enterprises be full of vitality, have a considerable upward development trend, operate normally and occupy the highest point of the market under the conditions of market economy.

Therefore, state-owned enterprises must introduce all kinds of high-level talents, introduce a competition mechanism, and reform and opening up, so that they can always be full of vitality and greatly improve the work efficiency of the entire enterprise.

If state-owned enterprises continue to stick to old conventions and do not seek new development, they will inevitably work inefficiently, will be eliminated sooner or later, and will go bankrupt.

The efficiency of state-owned enterprises is really not very low, but a procedure that must be passed. Because state-owned enterprises manage state assets, if they are too casual, it will be the loss and loss of state-owned assets. Therefore, state-owned enterprises work under the management system of relevant national policies and norms, not casually.

Instead, it is handled in accordance with the management system and rules and regulations of the enterprise, and there is no arbitrariness and violation of regulations. Therefore, everyone feels that the work efficiency is low, and these superficial phenomena will now give everyone the illusion. In fact, the work efficiency of state-owned enterprises is very high, and the things they decide and decide will be completed within a time limit.

They will actively do a good job in the country's major projects and social security and so on, and related things will be done in accordance with the deployment. They not only improve the economic efficiency of the enterprise, but also assume social responsibility. Therefore, state-owned enterprises are enterprises that must exist for the state to help the country and the people's livelihood, and are the needs of national management.

1.State-owned enterprises or public institutions? From the perspective of ordinary people, we tend to contact more public institutions than state-owned enterprises, and public institutions have always been considered inefficient due to well-known reasons (personal experience, word of mouth and people's expectations).

If it is only about the work efficiency of state-owned enterprises (including central enterprises).

Especially at this stage, I think it may not be inefficient, or it is a bit arbitrary to directly say that the efficiency of state-owned enterprises is low. 2.What is efficiency?

In my understanding of efficiency, it can be understood as two concepts: (1) one-part of time; (2) Output is more than input (1) Often we say that low work efficiency means that it takes more time to do the same thing, or less work in the same time. This is simply due to two reasons:

First, the process, system, and procedure are complex, and the second is the iron rice bowl of employees; Whether it is an enterprise or an individual employee, in the absence of survival pressure, the impact of the "no problem" mentality on efficiency can be imagined. In addition, state-owned enterprises tend to be large-scale, and once they reach that scale, the so-called big enterprise disease.

This is not only a problem for state-owned enterprises, but also a problem that plagues many large companies. (2) In terms of output ratio to input, we can only say that we are the sons of the republic.

The unique resource conditions of state-owned enterprises may make them less sensitive to investment, unlike private enterprises, where input (cost) may be a major event that affects the life and death of the enterprise. At the same time, we must also see that many large state-owned enterprises and central enterprises are doing major events involving the national line, and it is not possible to see results at one time, nor is it possible to use the input-output ratio.

to measure, such as public transportation.

If you still have to get the first subsidy, you can't make a profit, and profit is not its goal, so it makes no sense to talk about the input and output with money as the standard. 3.The purpose of the enterprise (1) Drucker.

It has been said that the purpose of a business is to create users and retain them. If we stand on this point, then the monopoly position of many state-owned enterprises and central enterprises, at least it is not difficult to achieve this purpose. Moreover, the efficiency is certainly not lower than that of many private enterprises that need to pay too much for themselves and can only win a little bit of resources and space; (2) Private enterprises will not support idlers, but state-owned enterprises will have more or less, not that enterprise leaders do not want to streamline institutions and personnel (which leaders do not want to achieve and act), nor that hard-working people do not hate idle and inefficient people, but state-owned enterprises have the responsibility to stabilize society and increase employment without survival pressure

If the state gives you the best resources, you can solve more problems for the country, you can earn a little less money, but you have to raise more people.

The efficiency of state-owned enterprises is quite high. Positions in state-owned enterprises will be trained. The rules and regulations of state-owned enterprises are also very strict. Every employee needs to be strictly enforced.

It is true that the work efficiency of most state-owned enterprises is very low, but there are also a small number of high work efficiency. Employees of state-owned enterprises do not work seriously and do not work hard. This is quite normal, phenomenon. Because the leadership is not strict. If you don't work, you will be paid. It is an iron rice bowl.

Relatively speaking, many state-owned enterprises will be less efficient than private enterprises, everything has to go through the process, and all aspects of approval are more cumbersome, and all aspects of private enterprises are more open, and the income in private enterprises is completely based on personal ability, and most of the state-owned enterprises will not let you get more, it will only make your work more cumbersome, and the workload will also increase. So many people learn to be lazy, and because they are lazy, their efficiency will decrease accordingly.

Not necessarily, these are also inherent stereotypes, as if thinking that civil servants can get to and from work on time.

State-owned enterprises also have high-efficiency and heavy overtime.

It cannot be limited by stereotypes.

For example, the last time I went to the provident fund center to handle business, I thought it would be very slow and complicated, but when I arrived at the scene, I found that the process was clear, the guidance was in place, the processing speed was very fast, and the staff was very patient.

The same is true for state-owned enterprises, which also have many efficient departments and units.

Of course, there are also inefficiency, which may also be related to the content and requirements of the work. Some positions can't ask for efficiency, only quality.

In fact, the work efficiency of state-owned enterprises is not low. Because it is only a state-owned enterprise, the large working environment makes the enthusiasm of employees not so strong. I think the cohesion of employees in state-owned enterprises is still relatively strong.

It's just that the embodiment of the cohesion of private enterprises is mostly in salary incentives, motivating private employees to strengthen team building and improve efficiency, so I think the above statement is only relative.

The work efficiency of state-owned enterprises is not necessarily very low, and it depends on which work is divided into people and departments. Because of every place. The way of working is different in each place, and everyone's work attitude is also different, so there will be different work efficiency, but most of them are more casual.

The work efficiency of state-owned enterprises is not necessarily low, this depends on the company's management system, as well as the operation mode, for most state-owned enterprises, the work efficiency is still very high, it is really not low.

As far as I can see, the efficiency is not low, it should be at an upper-middle level Everyone has always had a concept of low efficiency of state-owned enterprises, and the illusion of high efficiency of private enterprises is actually normal Private enterprises pay attention to interests, production and operation, and all the focus is on this, and they are naturally highly efficient in terms of operation In addition to production and operation, state-owned enterprises have many aspects that are the focus of work, such as strengthening organizational construction, fulfilling social responsibilities, and so on On management, Naturally, the efficiency is not as high as that of private enterprises, but in terms of overall workload, the efficiency of state-owned enterprises is not bad See a leaf and know the autumn, for example, private enterprises require business personnel to complete how much sales per month, how much payment is returned State-owned enterprises may require labor and management personnel to complete the payment of wages to all employees within the first three days of each month, the payment of social security provident fund, and so on The efficiency is really not low

The work efficiency of state-owned enterprises is not low, and the idea of having this concept should still be relatively backward. Or maybe not all state-owned enterprises are like this. In fact, the work efficiency of large state-owned enterprises such as Beijing and Shanghai is very high, no less than that of foreign enterprises, because the working mode of large state-owned enterprises is generally more advanced.

The work efficiency of state-owned enterprises is actually not low, and people may think that there are more departments in state-owned enterprises, so the work efficiency of collaborative work is not so high.

Personally, I feel that the work efficiency of state-owned enterprises cannot be said to be low, but when state-owned enterprises deal with some problems, the procedures are more cumbersome.

The work efficiency of state-owned enterprises is not low, and the general inefficient state-owned enterprises have long been closed, and now the most important state-owned enterprises are still quite high, so he can gain an undefeated foothold. Today's society is a competitive society, if you are inefficient, you will compete, but sooner or later people will close their doors, and the existing enterprises have strong competitiveness.

In fact, I think the work efficiency of state-owned enterprises is not very low, but the work efficiency of private enterprises is relatively high, and the efficiency of state-owned enterprises is relatively low, but although state-owned enterprises say that the work efficiency is low, but the work and some of their own interests will be guaranteed a lot, and there will be a lot of benefits in the work of state-owned enterprises, the work efficiency of state-owned enterprises is not as low as we imagined, mainly depends on the work efficiency of employees themselves, some such as serving some very important industries, The efficiency of state-owned enterprises may be relatively high.