What is the contradiction between quantum mechanics and the theory of relativity

The biggest contradiction between relativity and quantum theory lies in the difference in theoretical foundations. General relativity.

The uncertainty principle is not taken into account.

The theoretical basis of quantum theory is the uncertainty principle. The microscopic view of space-time in the general theory of relativity is continuous and smooth, but because the theoretical basis of quantum theory is the principle of uncertainty, the microscopic view of space-time is constantly undulating and fluctuating, also known as quantum fluctuations. The difference between these two microscopic views of space-time determines that they are incompatible.

At present, almost all theories that pursue unity seek to resolve the irreconcilable contradiction between the two views of time and space. Superstring theory is one of them, and it's reconciled like this. Because quantum fluctuations occur only on very small scales, superstring theory explains that the most basic composition of matter (that is, strings) is much larger than this scale, so it does not affect matter, so that space can be considered smooth, thus harmonizing general relativity and quantum mechanics.

contradictions. Hope!

Contradiction is the theory of relativity, especially general relativity, which is geometric, while quantum mechanics cannot be geometric. The theory of relativity is still classical physics.

Quantum mechanics and the theory of relativity, the combination of the two theories can explain everything, amazing!

It solves the contradiction between the theory of relativity and quantum mechanics.

a.Quark theory.

b.String Digging Sail Theory.

c.Proton Theory.

d.Neutron theory.

Correct answer: B

The mathematical theory that can solve the contradiction between quantum mechanics and relativity in physics is ().

a.Fermat's theorem.

b.The superstring scum attack theory Hu Liangzhen's pants are thick.

c.Topology.

d.Riemann Points.

Correct answer: B

Both general relativity and quantum theory have undergone numerous experimental tests in their respective fields, and to date, no definite experimental observations have contradicted one or the other. At one time, it was even thought that it was a misfortune for theoretical physicists to be born in an era where theory was ahead of experiments.

Today's theoretical physics is still full of challenges, but compared with Newton and Einstein's "intimate contact" with experiments, the challenges and development of theoretical physics today come more from the requirements of theory itself, from the unremitting efforts of physics to pursue unity and perfection.

The theory of quantum gravity is a good example of this. Although most of the major advances in the theory of quantum gravity have been made in the last decade or so, the idea of gravitational sonization was developed by LRosenfeld proposed.

In a sense, in most of today's research, quantum theory is not so much a concrete theory as a theoretical framework, a theoretical framework for quantizing a concrete theory, such as a field theory that describes some kind of interaction.

General relativity, as a field theory describing gravitational interactions, was the only basic interaction field theory other than electromagnetic field theory in the early stage of quantum theory. Putting it within the framework of quantum theory is therefore a natural idea after quantum electrodynamics.

However, the road to gravitational sonization is far more difficult than the quantization of electromagnetic fields. After generations of physicists have struggled without making substantial progress, there are reasons to revisit the case for the pursuit of quantum gravity.

Quantum mechanics is the study of the laws of particle motion in the microscopic world, while general relativity is the study of the laws of matter in the macroscopic worldIs general relativity right, or is quantum mechanics right? It's not certain at this time....I believe that as research develops, a unified answer will be found for both....

General relativity is the study of the laws of material motion in our macrocosm, quantum mechanics is the study of the laws of particle motion in the microscopic world, and our macrocosm and the microcosm are closely connected, so the results of the two studies are incompatible, and it is not known which of the two is the real truth of the universe

General relativity and quantum mechanics are mainly limited by people to produce entanglement.

The object of general relativity is the macrocosm of the universe, while the object of quantum mechanics is the microcosm of elementary particles.

The number in the figure represents the smallest unit of indivisible positive and negative electromagnetic information - qubits (Qubit) (name physicist John. John Wheeler famously said, "It from bit."

After the development of quantum information research, this concept was sublimated to the point that everything originates from qubits) Note: Bits are bits.

The numbers in the figure represent the smallest unit of indivisible positive and negative chord information - string bits

In fact, photons are very peculiar particles, they either always move at the only speed of light c in a vacuum, or they don't exist at all! The root cause of this is that the static mass of a photon is 0, which determines that it cannot move at any speed lower than c, otherwise its moving mass will always be 0 (only when the speed of light is reached, its moving mass can reach a finite value), and 0 mass means that it does not exist!

Note that only ordinary matter with a static mass of non-0 will have an infinite mass when it reaches the speed of light (which also means that ordinary matter can never really reach the speed of light); The dynamic mass of a photon with a static mass of 0 can be an arbitrary finite value, which is determined by m=hf cc of quantum theory.

The reason why the speed of light in the medium appears slow is not because the speed of the photons themselves has slowed down, but because the photons are constantly "retained" by the particles of the medium during the journey of the medium, which are absorbed by the atoms for a short period of time and then released. In short, stop-and-go photons slow down the speed of light waves in the medium in general.

In the equation between velocity and mass, when the velocity reaches the speed of light, the mass becomes infinite, but you must know that in quantum theory, light has no rest mass, and it can be regarded as a particle, just for the purpose of visual description, it is not a simple object, it is a way of energy propagation, and we generally say that "object" is not a concept, it does not exist when it is at rest, and only when it travels at a certain speed can it have kinetic energy. I don't know if this can solve the doubts in my heart.

Because light has no mass, 0 times infinity is still 0