Microsoft vs Android. Both systems have been used.

If you're just an ordinary user, then it's good if you consider the price, the current Android app is very wide, and Microsoft's has not been officially launched. In the future, it is believed that a situation of three kingdoms will be formed (Android, Apple, Microsoft). At present, only Android is an open source model, so many manufacturers give priority to this system, because they don't have to pay royalties.

Advantages: Android: free and open source, with a very large market share. The internet is full of Android software.

Microsoft: Although it has a small market share at present, its Windows operating system almost unifies all ordinary users, and there are Windows developers behind it who cannot be underestimated and can quickly transition to Windows Phone development, which is very potential. From the beginning of the design of WP mobile phones, Microsoft requires authorized manufacturers to customize the hardware according to standards to ensure the performance of WP mobile phones.

Windows users should know that Microsoft's backward compatibility ability is also very good, and there is no need to worry about some software not working after upgrading the system.

Disadvantages: Android: Because everyone comes to produce Android mobile phones, so the hardware quality is mixed, Android because of open source, from a technical level, each manufacturer can make its own version, which may cause some Android software to be used on other versions of Android in the future, that is to say, the version may be a little chaotic danger.

Microsoft: The charging system first determines that not all manufacturers will produce WP mobile phones. At present, the promotion of WP mobile phones has not yet reached the eruption period, and it is estimated that next year with the launch of the Nokia Lumia series of mobile phones, it may be possible to see in the middle of 2012 whether Microsoft mobile phones can really eat away at the market share of Android.

In fact, the biggest difference between Android and Microsoft is how much free software can have, which is the key. As long as the operating system is profitable, the operating system will grow and develop, and the more free it is, the less promising it is, because there is no money to be made, and merchants and developers will not want to come. But for ordinary users, the more they charge, the less willing they are to use it.

This is an eternal contradiction.

I still recommend that ordinary users buy the corresponding machine according to how much money they have in their hands. Refer to the mobile phone of the close friends around you, you can give priority to the same as them, because the mobile phone with the same operating system can transfer files and play games together. Mobile phones are convenient for people, and users at different levels have different considerations, and ordinary users don't have to care too much about which operating system is more promising.

All have been used. Microsoft's fluency is very good,Touch is quite sensitive,Better than Android,This is the feeling,But the machine is not perfect,What don't you learn to learn Apple,Synchronization has to use zune,Okay,Forget it with zune,It's only possible to synchronize**,**and**,I want to get a txt**I can't get in,The function is not perfect,It feels like it's half a hanger out of the mountain,I believe Microsoft wants to do it well this time,It will be done slowly,Android is much more convenient,In fact, the smart machine is a toss,But Android is more mature, Android is recommended.

This problem is actually not a problem, because it is now a commercial economic society, and this situation basically does not exist.

The question should be asked: when will China have its own PC system and mobile system?

That's the problem.

Because we know that in the Internet era, whether it is hardware or software, you have to rely on the system to exist in the end.

Why did Bill Gates dominate the world's richest list for so many years? It's because people have a system. In fact, one of his systems was originally bought from a programmer, and it was only 50,000 dollars.

But the vision of people is that there is such a long-term perspective, and the importance of the system was known a long time ago. This is the role of IQ and vision.

In terms of system, many countries in the world are lagging behind, and this is not a problem of money, nor is it a problem of starting, the biggest problem is the problem of talent. Companies like Microsoft and Google are able to make powerful systems because they bring together people from all over the world.

The United States has a special talent visa, that is, no matter what country you are a talent from, as long as your ability is reached, you can get a special visa for the United States for a few years, and you can work for a large company such as Microsoft or Google. This is important. Because, the thinking and ability of talents in a country and a region are limited, but the talents of many countries in the world are concentrated, and it is different.

Therefore, to develop systems and high technology, it is not only about discovering talents, but more importantly, how to attract high-level talents from all over the world. Nowadays, many Chinese talents are working in large American companies at a young age, which is a brain drain.

Coming up with something new can be a competitive relationship.

Some designers have drawn a concept map of Microsoft's dual-screen device based on previous rumors.

If the phone system project were abruptly aborted, it would not be in line with Microsoft's long-term strategy.

I think it's a long-term strategy.

Microsoft doesn't really have that idea.

Maybe that's true.

I guess I'm going to have some strategy.

Obviously, Microsoft already has a large number of partners in promoting its Android software, and it would not be wise to launch an Android phone to compete with those partners.

If you abruptly abort a phone system project.